nixpkgs/nixos
emilylange 59719f787e
chromium{Beta,Dev},google-chrome-{beta,dev}: drop
This is mainly due to the lack of maintenance in nixpkgs.
`google-chrome-{beta,dev}` depend on `chromium{Beta,Dev}`'s version
info.

`chromium{Beta,Dev}` are rarely updated and explicitly blocklisted by
`hydra.nixos.org`, meaning they are almost always outdated and not
cached in `cache.nixos.org`.

`chromium{Beta,Dev}` were intended to fix the build derivation of each
new major release (if something broke) *before* stable reached that
new major release.
Allowing for fast bumps in nixpkgs, especially if the stable bump
contains very important critical security fixes.

Something that can easily be replicated by using an early-stable release
or by manually entering a dev/beta version string in stable's
`upstream-info.nix`.

This resolves exposing end-users to outdated and vulnerable
`google-chrome-{beta,dev}` and `chromium{Beta,Dev}` versions.
2023-10-28 22:55:18 +02:00
..
doc/manual chromium{Beta,Dev},google-chrome-{beta,dev}: drop 2023-10-28 22:55:18 +02:00
lib Merge pull request #262021 from Enzime/linux-builder-cross 2023-10-24 14:34:29 +02:00
maintainers maintainers/scripts/oci: add missing parameter 2023-09-21 22:57:39 +01:00
modules Merge pull request #263033 from ElvishJerricco/systemd-stage-1-filesystems-encrypted 2023-10-28 20:38:14 +02:00
tests Merge pull request #263033 from ElvishJerricco/systemd-stage-1-filesystems-encrypted 2023-10-28 20:38:14 +02:00
COPYING
default.nix
README.md CONTRIBUTING.md: Move boot loader-specific sentence to pkgs/README.md 2023-08-14 19:50:02 +02:00
release-combined.nix nixos/release-combined: re-add ZFS to release-combined 2023-10-24 11:00:35 -04:00
release-small.nix
release.nix nixos/netboot: fix eval on non x86_64 systems 2023-10-28 15:54:32 +02:00

NixOS

NixOS is a Linux distribution based on the purely functional package management system Nix. More information can be found at https://nixos.org/nixos and in the manual in doc/manual.

Testing changes

You can add new module to your NixOS configuration file (usually its /etc/nixos/configuration.nix). And do sudo nixos-rebuild test -I nixpkgs=<path to your local nixpkgs folder> --fast.

Reviewing contributions

When changing the bootloader installation process, extra care must be taken. Grub installations cannot be rolled back, hence changes may break peoples installations forever. For any non-trivial change to the bootloader please file a PR asking for review, especially from @edolstra.

Module updates

Module updates are submissions changing modules in some ways. These often contains changes to the options or introduce new options.

Reviewing process:

  • Ensure that the module maintainers are notified.
    • CODEOWNERS will make GitHub notify users based on the submitted changes, but it can happen that it misses some of the package maintainers.
  • Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
  • Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
    • Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities, loaOf and string types are deprecated).
    • Description, default and example should be provided.
  • Ensure that option changes are backward compatible.
    • mkRenamedOptionModuleWith provides a way to make option changes backward compatible.
  • Ensure that removed options are declared with mkRemovedOptionModule
  • Ensure that changes that are not backward compatible are mentioned in release notes.
  • Ensure that documentations affected by the change is updated.

Sample template for a module update review is provided below.

##### Reviewed points

- [ ] changes are backward compatible
- [ ] removed options are declared with `mkRemovedOptionModule`
- [ ] changes that are not backward compatible are documented in release notes
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options types are appropriate
- [ ] options description is set
- [ ] options example is provided
- [ ] documentation affected by the changes is updated

##### Possible improvements

##### Comments

New modules

New modules submissions introduce a new module to NixOS.

Reviewing process:

  • Ensure that the module tests, if any, are succeeding.
  • Ensure that the introduced options are correct.
    • Type should be appropriate (string related types differs in their merging capabilities, loaOf and string types are deprecated).
    • Description, default and example should be provided.
  • Ensure that module meta field is present
    • Maintainers should be declared in meta.maintainers.
    • Module documentation should be declared with meta.doc.
  • Ensure that the module respect other modules functionality.
    • For example, enabling a module should not open firewall ports by default.

Sample template for a new module review is provided below.

##### Reviewed points

- [ ] module path fits the guidelines
- [ ] module tests succeed on ARCHITECTURE
- [ ] options have appropriate types
- [ ] options have default
- [ ] options have example
- [ ] options have descriptions
- [ ] No unneeded package is added to environment.systemPackages
- [ ] meta.maintainers is set
- [ ] module documentation is declared in meta.doc

##### Possible improvements

##### Comments