# Example Our api under test: ```haskell -- Obligatory fancy-types pragma tax {-# LANGUAGE DataKinds #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeOperators #-} {-# LANGUAGE DerivingStrategies #-} {-# LANGUAGE StandaloneDeriving #-} {-# LANGUAGE DerivingVia #-} {-# LANGUAGE TypeApplications #-} {-# LANGUAGE DeriveGeneric #-} {-# LANGUAGE GeneralizedNewtypeDeriving #-} {-# LANGUAGE RecordWildCards #-} import Roboservant import Test.Hspec import Servant import GHC.Generics import Data.Typeable import Data.Hashable newtype A = A Int deriving (Generic, Eq, Show, Typeable) deriving newtype (Hashable, FromHttpApiData, ToHttpApiData) newtype B = B Int deriving (Generic, Eq, Show, Typeable) deriving newtype (Hashable, FromHttpApiData, ToHttpApiData) type Api = "item" :> Get '[JSON] A :<|> "itemAdd" :> Capture "one" B :> Capture "two" B :> Get '[JSON] B :<|> "item" :> Capture "itemId" B :> Get '[JSON] () goodServer = server (pure $ A 0) badServer = server (pure $ A 1) server introduce = introduce :<|> combine :<|> eliminate where combine (B i) (B j) = pure $ B (i + j) eliminate (B i) | i > 10 = error "give up, eleven is way too big and probably not even real" | otherwise = pure () ``` In the test file, we first define the tests: the faulty server should fail and the good server should pass. ```haskell spec = describe "example" $ do it "good server should not fail" $ do fuzz @Api goodServer config >>= (`shouldSatisfy` isNothing) it "bad server should fail" $ do fuzz @Api badServer config >>= (`shouldSatisfy` serverFailure) config = defaultConfig { -- we expect to be able to cover the api from our starting point: -- this will fail the test if we don't. coverageThreshold = 0.99 } -- there are other tweakable things in the config, like maximum runtime, reps, -- per-request healthchecks, seeds, and verbose logging. Have a look at -- Roboservant.Types.Config for details. ``` And unless we want to ship roboservant and all its dependencies to production, we also need some orphan instances: because As are the only value we can get without an input, we need to be able to break them down. ```haskell deriving via (Compound A) instance Breakdown A -- if we wanted to assemble As from parts as well, we'd derive using Compound deriving via (Atom A) instance BuildFrom A ``` Similarly, to generate the first B from the Ints we got from inside the A, we need to be able to build it up from components. ```haskell deriving via (Compound B) instance BuildFrom B deriving via (Atom B) instance Breakdown B ``` finally some uninteresting utilities and the entrypoint ```haskell main = hspec spec serverFailure :: Maybe Report -> Bool serverFailure c = case c of Just Report{..} -> let RoboservantException{..} = rsException in failureReason /= NoPossibleMoves _ -> False isNothing x = case x of Nothing -> True _ -> False ```