chat: ota attempt
chat: ota triggers chat-store to tell chat-hook to send cards to update chat-store's state
contact-view: commented out avatars and base64
chat: cleaned up commits
* master: (484 commits)
king: Slight CLI cleanup and fix test build.
king: Add command-line flags to configure HTTP and HTTPS ports.
groups: reduce metadata updates, removal
chat: reducer handles metadata removal
groups: exclude group metadata from channels list
groups: set and surface group name metadata
groups: remove dummy 'share' flow, 'default' group
contacts: rename, migrate '~contacts' to '~groups'
sh/release: rename vere release tarballs
vere: patch version bump (v0.10.3 -> v0.10.4.rc1) [ci skip]
pills: updated brass and solid
chat: pull room contacts from associated group
chat: spell 'permanent' correctly
eyre: remove padding from 'access' input
chat: only delete metadata for a chat if you created it
chat: settings inputs add borders on focus
vere: disables gc on |mass in the daemon process
chat: remove console.log from metadataAction
chat: style fixes during review, use metadata-hook
chat: edit description, color settings
...
* origin/os1-rc: (439 commits)
pills: updated brass and solid
chat: pull room contacts from associated group
chat: spell 'permanent' correctly
eyre: remove padding from 'access' input
chat: only delete metadata for a chat if you created it
chat: settings inputs add borders on focus
chat: remove console.log from metadataAction
chat: style fixes during review, use metadata-hook
chat: edit description, color settings
chat: add update-metadata to metadata reducer
chat: revise api.js to match data structures
metadata-json: add json to action parsers
chat: construct settings page for metadata
chat: correct bottom border on join links
chat: copy shortcodes
chat: linkify unmanaged chats
metadata-hook: support group members other than host creating shared resources
contacts: add bg-gray0 to root page
chat + contact views: updated for style and to assert that group-path must be equal to app-path if there are ships in the members set
contacts: changed color + copy of "add to group" button
...
- finds resources & displays details using metadata-store
- supports creating new collections for groups
- supports creating new collections with new unmanaged group
- supports receiving invites for new (unmanaged) collections
In order to track & respond to all group-related metadata, hooks may
want to subscribe to the metadata-store in response to group creation.
In that case it is possible that there are no entries for the group-path
in group-indices yet.
This makes us fall back to the empty set in case group-indices has no
entry for the group-path yet.
The previous Tile.png for the Dojo module (Soto) was a stylized rendering of "barcen" and could be seen as confusing. Fixing up the image to appear more *actually* glyph-like.
* origin/ted/ford-no-pit:
pills: update solid
http.c: revert timeout to original ~m10
tests: prime ford %reef cache
http.c: bump timeout from ~m20 to ~m30
http.c: bump timeout from ~m10 to ~m20
tests: fix ford tests for no %reef short-circuit
ford: remove pit short-circuit
* liam-fitzgerald/hoon-spot:
hoon: toggle spot typehints on flag
hoon: support %spot hint in xray
hoon: add %spot typehint
Signed-off-by: Jared Tobin <jared@tlon.io>
In order to track & respond to all app-related metadata, hooks may want to
subscribe to the metadata-store as the first thing they do on-init. In that case
it is exceedingly likely that there are no entries for the app-name in
app-indices yet.
This makes us fall back to the empty set in case app-indices has no entry for
the app-name yet.
Basically, this PR includes a collection of edits made to the headers across each of our OS1 modules.
I flattened the font sizing, fixed edge margins/padding, and fixed some button copy in the case of the Contacts app.
If we don't host a group, we can't (locally) delete it, but we do still
have a permission-hook entry we want to clean up. This does that
deletion, but still relies on the permission-hook logic to clean it up
in the local group case.
Permissions for the new group need to be exposed to the members of those
new groups. This makes the on-migrate logic poke the permission-hook for
that.
This temporary, upgrade-oriented logic depends on two assumptions:
- If the metadata-store is not running, we are still in the process of
applying the upgrade.
- If the above is true, all chats are /~host/name, all groups are
/~/~host/name, and they have a strict one-to-one relation.
Armed with those assumptions, we can deduce groups from chats and vice
versa without depending on the metadata-store, allowing us to carry on
as if it were already running.
If we %add-owned, then we add an entry to the access-control jug matching the
data we put into the synced map. When a permission gets deleted, we remove it
from synced, but previously neglected to clean up the matching access-control
entry.
This ensures that if a permission was deleted, and we had it registered as
owned, that the relevant access-control entry is removed from state.
We want to move from group/permission paths of the form /chat/~host/name
to /~/~host/name, merging the ./read and ./write permission paths into a
single permission matching the group path.
(The leading /~ signifies an "unmanaged" group, one used by apps
internally, and not explicitly exposed to the user as a contacts group.)
This upgrade logic does roughly the following, for every chat path, to
accomplish the migration:
1. delete ./read and ./write groups associated with the chat
2. create a new group containing an approximate "uni" of the old groups
3. register the chat + new group with the metadata-store
4. hook the group up to its matching permission set
Note that because existing groups are hooked up through the
permission-group-hook, doing step 1 deletes the associated permissions.
Step 4 then re-establishes that relation for the newly created group.
The logic here scries into the metadata-store, and as such depends on
that having been started prior to this upgrade process.
When permissions change, find out which chats are impacted (on the
assumption that permission paths are group paths), then perform actions
wrt that chat accordingly.
When a chat is interacted with, find out which groups the chat is
associated with, then use those to perform permission checks. If the
check passes for any group, permission is granted.
