elm-review/tests/NoBooleanCaseOf.elm

104 lines
2.3 KiB
Elm
Raw Normal View History

module NoBooleanCaseOf exposing (rule)
{-|
@docs rule
-}
import Elm.Syntax.Expression as Expression exposing (Expression)
import Elm.Syntax.Node as Node exposing (Node)
import Elm.Syntax.Pattern as Pattern exposing (Pattern)
import Review.Rule as Rule exposing (Error, Rule)
{-| Reports when pattern matching is used for a boolean value.
The idiomatic way to check for a condition is to use an `if` expression.
Read more about it at: <https://guide.elm-lang.org/core_language.html#if-expressions>
config =
[ NoBooleanCaseOf.rule
]
This won't report pattern matching when a boolean is part of the evaluated value.
## Fail
_ =
case bool of
True ->
expression
False ->
otherExpression
## Success
_ =
if bool then
expression
else
otherExpression
_ =
case ( bool, somethingElse ) of
( True, SomeThingElse ) ->
expression
_ ->
otherExpression
# When (not) to use this rule
You should not use this rule if you do not care about how your boolean values are
evaluated.
-}
rule : Rule
rule =
Rule.newModuleRuleSchema "NoBooleanCaseOf" ()
|> Rule.withSimpleExpressionVisitor expressionVisitor
|> Rule.fromModuleRuleSchema
expressionVisitor : Node Expression -> List (Error {})
expressionVisitor node =
case Node.value node of
Expression.CaseExpression { expression, cases } ->
if List.any (Tuple.first >> isBoolConstructor) cases then
[ error expression ]
else
[]
_ ->
[]
2020-04-07 23:54:17 +03:00
error : Node a -> Error {}
error node =
Rule.error
{ message = "Replace `case..of` by an `if` condition"
, details =
[ "The idiomatic way to check for a condition is to use an `if` expression."
, "Read more about it at: https://guide.elm-lang.org/core_language.html#if-expressions"
]
}
(Node.range node)
isBoolConstructor : Node Pattern -> Bool
isBoolConstructor node =
case Node.value node of
Pattern.NamedPattern { moduleName, name } _ ->
(name == "True" || name == "False")
&& (moduleName == [] || moduleName == [ "Basics" ])
_ ->
False