mirror of
https://github.com/jfmengels/elm-review.git
synced 2024-12-23 09:42:49 +03:00
Make it not possible to use withModuleVisitor after withModuleContext
This commit is contained in:
parent
06da24e1aa
commit
abac9224bc
@ -11,12 +11,18 @@ This function cannot handle the argument sent through the (|>) pipe:
|
||||
|
||||
The argument is:
|
||||
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema () () {}
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema () () { canAddModuleVisitor : () }
|
||||
|
||||
But (|>) is piping it to a function that expects:
|
||||
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema
|
||||
()
|
||||
()
|
||||
{ schemaState | withModuleContext : Rule.Required }
|
||||
{ a | canAddModuleVisitor : (), withModuleContext : Rule.Required }
|
||||
|
||||
Hint: Seems like a record field typo. Maybe withModuleContext should be
|
||||
canAddModuleVisitor?
|
||||
|
||||
Hint: Can more type annotations be added? Type annotations always help me give
|
||||
more specific messages, and I think they could help a lot in this case!
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
|
||||
module No_WithModuleVisitor_After_WithModuleContext exposing (rule)
|
||||
|
||||
{-| We want to forbid using `Rule.withModuleVisitor` after having used `withModuleContext`.
|
||||
-}
|
||||
|
||||
import Review.Rule as Rule exposing (Rule)
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
rule : Rule
|
||||
rule =
|
||||
Rule.newProjectRuleSchema "No_WithModuleVisitor_After_WithModuleContext" ()
|
||||
|> Rule.withModuleVisitor moduleVisitor
|
||||
|> Rule.withModuleContext
|
||||
{ fromProjectToModule = \_ _ () -> ()
|
||||
, fromModuleToProject = \_ _ () -> ()
|
||||
, foldProjectContexts = \_ () -> ()
|
||||
}
|
||||
|> Rule.withModuleVisitor moduleVisitor
|
||||
|> Rule.withFinalProjectEvaluation (\_ -> [])
|
||||
|> Rule.fromProjectRuleSchema
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
moduleVisitor : Rule.ModuleRuleSchema {} () -> Rule.ModuleRuleSchema { hasAtLeastOneVisitor : () } ()
|
||||
moduleVisitor schema =
|
||||
schema
|
||||
|> Rule.withModuleDefinitionVisitor (\_ () -> ( [], () ))
|
@ -17,12 +17,18 @@ This function cannot handle the argument sent through the (|>) pipe:
|
||||
|
||||
The argument is:
|
||||
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema () () {}
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema () () { canAddModuleVisitor : () }
|
||||
|
||||
But (|>) is piping it to a function that expects:
|
||||
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema
|
||||
()
|
||||
()
|
||||
{ schemaState | withModuleContext : Rule.Required }
|
||||
{ a | canAddModuleVisitor : (), withModuleContext : Rule.Required }
|
||||
|
||||
Hint: Seems like a record field typo. Maybe withModuleContext should be
|
||||
canAddModuleVisitor?
|
||||
|
||||
Hint: Can more type annotations be added? Type annotations always help me give
|
||||
more specific messages, and I think they could help a lot in this case!
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -925,7 +925,7 @@ You can't use [`withElmJsonModuleVisitor`](#withElmJsonModuleVisitor) or [`withD
|
||||
in project rules. Instead, you should use [`withElmJsonProjectVisitor`](#withElmJsonProjectVisitor) or [`withDependenciesProjectVisitor`](#withDependenciesProjectVisitor).
|
||||
|
||||
-}
|
||||
newProjectRuleSchema : String -> projectContext -> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext {}
|
||||
newProjectRuleSchema : String -> projectContext -> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext { canAddModuleVisitor : () }
|
||||
newProjectRuleSchema name_ initialProjectContext =
|
||||
ProjectRuleSchema
|
||||
{ name = name_
|
||||
@ -962,8 +962,8 @@ fromProjectRuleSchema (ProjectRuleSchema schema) =
|
||||
-}
|
||||
withModuleVisitor :
|
||||
(ModuleRuleSchema {} moduleContext -> ModuleRuleSchema { hasAtLeastOneVisitor : () } moduleContext)
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext schemaState
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext { schemaState | withModuleContext : Required }
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext { schemaState | canAddModuleVisitor : () }
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext { schemaState | canAddModuleVisitor : (), withModuleContext : Required }
|
||||
withModuleVisitor visitor (ProjectRuleSchema schema) =
|
||||
let
|
||||
previousModuleVisitors : List (ModuleRuleSchema {} moduleContext -> ModuleRuleSchema { hasAtLeastOneVisitor : () } moduleContext)
|
||||
@ -994,7 +994,7 @@ withModuleContext :
|
||||
, fromModuleToProject : ModuleKey -> Node ModuleName -> moduleContext -> projectContext
|
||||
, foldProjectContexts : projectContext -> projectContext -> projectContext
|
||||
}
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext { schemaState | withModuleContext : Required }
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext { schemaState | canAddModuleVisitor : (), withModuleContext : Required }
|
||||
-> ProjectRuleSchema projectContext moduleContext schemaState
|
||||
withModuleContext moduleContext (ProjectRuleSchema schema) =
|
||||
let
|
||||
|
@ -167,8 +167,8 @@ emptyScope =
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
addProjectVisitors :
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema { projectContext | scope : ProjectContext } { moduleContext | scope : ModuleContext } schemaState
|
||||
-> Rule.ProjectRuleSchema { projectContext | scope : ProjectContext } { moduleContext | scope : ModuleContext } { schemaState | withModuleContext : Rule.Required }
|
||||
Rule.ProjectRuleSchema { projectContext | scope : ProjectContext } { moduleContext | scope : ModuleContext } { schemaState | canAddModuleVisitor : () }
|
||||
-> Rule.ProjectRuleSchema { projectContext | scope : ProjectContext } { moduleContext | scope : ModuleContext } { schemaState | canAddModuleVisitor : (), withModuleContext : Rule.Required }
|
||||
addProjectVisitors schema =
|
||||
schema
|
||||
|> Rule.withContextFromImportedModules
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user