mirror of
https://github.com/jfmengels/elm-review.git
synced 2024-11-25 10:04:38 +03:00
Fix changelog
This commit is contained in:
parent
27a45b41bd
commit
aef60531fd
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ Fixed a bug that ignored fixes from rules that were not marked as providing fixe
|
||||
This was meant to be handled by the CLI, but didn't work as expected.
|
||||
|
||||
When the rule uses [`Review.Rule.withIsFileIgnored`], the test runner will now attempt to re-run the rule while ignoring
|
||||
some of the files (it will do so for every possible combination) and assert that the results are the same. This is to
|
||||
some files (it will do so for every possible combination) and assert that the results are the same. This is to
|
||||
check that the knowledge is only used for performance improvements and change the result. This way, complex rules can
|
||||
avoid writing extremely complicated test setups to test that complex scenarios work behave as expected even when some
|
||||
files are ignored.
|
||||
@ -124,6 +124,7 @@ Help would be appreciated to fill the blanks!
|
||||
[`Review.Rule.withIsFileIgnored`]: https://package.elm-lang.org/packages/jfmengels/elm-review/latest/Review-Rule#withIsFileIgnored
|
||||
[`Review.Test.ignoredFilesImpactResults`]: https://package.elm-lang.org/packages/jfmengels/elm-review/latest/Review-Rule-Test#ignoredFilesImpactResults
|
||||
|
||||
[2.12.0]: https://github.com/jfmengels/elm-review/releases/tag/2.12.0
|
||||
[2.11.1]: https://github.com/jfmengels/elm-review/releases/tag/2.11.1
|
||||
[2.11.0]: https://github.com/jfmengels/elm-review/releases/tag/2.11.0
|
||||
[2.10.0]: https://github.com/jfmengels/elm-review/releases/tag/2.10.0
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user