module NoMissingTypeAnnotation exposing (rule) {-| @docs rule -} import Elm.Syntax.Declaration as Declaration exposing (Declaration) import Elm.Syntax.Node as Node exposing (Node) import Review.Rule as Rule exposing (Error, Rule) {-| Reports top-level declarations that do not have a type annotation. Type annotations help you understand what happens in the code, and it will help the compiler give better error messages. config = [ NoMissingTypeAnnotation.rule ] This rule does not report declarations without a type annotation inside a `let in`. For that, enable [`NoMissingTypeAnnotationInLetIn`](./NoMissingTypeAnnotationInLetIn). ## Fail a = 1 ## Success a : number a = 1 b : number b = let c = 2 in c ## Try it out You can try this rule out by running the following command: ```bash elm-review --template jfmengels/review-common/example --rules NoMissingTypeAnnotation ``` -} rule : Rule rule = Rule.newModuleRuleSchema "NoMissingTypeAnnotation" () |> Rule.withSimpleDeclarationVisitor declarationVisitor |> Rule.fromModuleRuleSchema declarationVisitor : Node Declaration -> List (Error {}) declarationVisitor declaration = case Node.value declaration of Declaration.FunctionDeclaration function -> case function.signature of Nothing -> let name : Node String name = function.declaration |> Node.value |> .name in [ Rule.error { message = "Missing type annotation for `" ++ Node.value name ++ "`" , details = [ "Type annotations help you understand what happens in the code, and it will help the compiler give better error messages." ] } (Node.range name) ] Just _ -> [] _ -> []