module NoMissingTypeAnnotationInLetIn exposing (rule) {-| @docs rule -} import Elm.Syntax.Expression as Expression exposing (Expression) import Elm.Syntax.Node as Node exposing (Node) import Review.Rule as Rule exposing (Error, Rule) {-| Reports `let in` declarations that do not have a type annotation. Type annotations help you understand what happens in the code, and it will help the compiler give better error messages. config = [ NoMissingTypeAnnotationInLetIn.rule ] This rule does not report top-level declarations without a type annotation inside a `let in`. For that, enable [`NoMissingTypeAnnotation`](./NoMissingTypeAnnotation). ## Fail a : number a = let -- Missing annotation b = 2 in b ## Success -- Top-level annotation is not necessary, but good to have! a : number a = let b : number b = 2 in b ## Try it out You can try this rule out by running the following command: ```bash elm-review --template jfmengels/elm-review-common/example --rules NoMissingTypeAnnotationInLetIn ``` -} rule : Rule rule = Rule.newModuleRuleSchema "NoMissingTypeAnnotationInLetIn" () |> Rule.withSimpleExpressionVisitor expressionVisitor |> Rule.fromModuleRuleSchema expressionVisitor : Node Expression -> List (Error {}) expressionVisitor expression = case Node.value expression of Expression.LetExpression { declarations } -> List.filterMap (\declaration -> case Node.value declaration of Expression.LetFunction function -> reportFunctionWithoutSignature function _ -> Nothing ) declarations _ -> [] reportFunctionWithoutSignature : Expression.Function -> Maybe (Error {}) reportFunctionWithoutSignature function = case function.signature of Just _ -> Nothing Nothing -> let name : Node String name = function.declaration |> Node.value |> .name in Rule.error { message = "Missing type annotation for `" ++ Node.value name ++ "`" , details = [ "Type annotations help you understand what happens in the code, and it will help the compiler give better error messages." ] } (Node.range name) |> Just