10 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Stephen Thirlwall	86eae5ec38	Revert { X } -> ( hash-map X ) reader macro ... The macro breaks the step 2 tests.	2015-03-28 15:20:04 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	cb25284585	c++11: step A	2015-03-27 20:44:43 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	2f61492a1e	c++11: step 9	2015-03-27 20:44:43 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	3a8e11b85b	c++11: step 8	2015-03-27 20:44:43 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	5f8f337a42	c++11: step 7	2015-03-27 20:44:43 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	ad50bab2e5	c++11: step 6	2015-03-27 20:44:42 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	ad0fc149de	c++11: step 4	2015-03-27 20:44:42 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	dc9b184b66	c++11: step 3	2015-03-27 20:44:42 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	179e8eafe4	c++11: step 2 ... Note that the optional tests for step 1 now fail because I no longer create a hash directly in the reader, rather handle this as a reader macro: { LIST } -> ( hash-map LIST ) This way, once the constructor has built the hash-map, the hash is now evaluated, and its evaluation procedure is a no-op. I'd like to do the same with vectors, but this isn't so easy, as we use vectors as parameter lists in fn* later on. ie. we'd have this situation, which is incorrect (and I don't see an obvious workaround) (fn* [params] body) -> (fn* (vector params) body)	2015-03-27 20:44:42 +11:00
Stephen Thirlwall	8bd091e3ad	c++11: step 1	2015-03-27 20:44:42 +11:00