2# Hints for Recursive Type Aliases
4At the root of this issue is the distinction between a `type` and a `type alias`.
7## What is a type alias?
9When you create a type alias, you are just creating a shorthand to refer to an existing type. So when you say the following:
12type alias Time = Float
14type alias Degree = Float
16type alias Weight = Float
19You have not created any *new* types, you just made some alternate names for `Float`. You can write down things like this and it'll work fine:
22add : Time -> Degree -> Weight
27This is kind of a weird way to use type aliases though. The typical usage would be for records, where you do not want to write out the whole thing every time. Stuff like this:
37It is much easier to write down `Person` in a type, and then it will just expand out to the underlying type when the compiler checks the program.
40## Recursive type aliases?
42Okay, so let's say you have some type that may contain itself. In Elm, a common example of this is a comment that might have subcomments:
49 , responses : List Comment
53Now remember that type *aliases* are just alternate names for the real type. So to make `Comment` into a concrete type, the compiler would start expanding it out.
69 , responses : List ...
75The compiler cannot deal with values like this. It would just keep expanding forever.
80In cases where you want a recursive type, you need to actually create a brand new type. This is what the `type` keyword is for. A simple example of this can be seen when defining a linked list:
88No matter what, the type of `Node n xs` is going to be `List`. There is no expansion to be done. This means you can represent recursive structures with types that do not explode into infinity.
90So let's return to wanting to represent a `Comment` that may have responses. There are a couple ways to do this:
93### Obvious, but kind of annoying
101 , responses : List Comment
105Now let's say you want to register an upvote on a comment:
108upvote : Comment -> Comment
109upvote (Comment comment) =
110 Comment { comment | upvotes = 1 + comment.upvotes }
113It is kind of annoying that we now have to unwrap and wrap the record to do anything with it.
116### Less obvious, but nicer
123 , responses : Responses
126type Responses = Responses (List Comment)
129In this world, we introduce the `Responses` type to capture the recursion, but `Comment` is still an alias for a record. This means the `upvote` function looks nice again:
132upvote : Comment -> Comment
134 { comment | upvotes = 1 + comment.upvotes }
137So rather than having to unwrap a `Comment` to do *anything* to it, you only have to do some unwrapping in the cases where you are doing something recursive. In practice, this means you will do less unwrapping which is nice.
140## Mutually recursive type aliases
142It is also possible to build type aliases that are *mutually* recursive. That might be something like this:
149 , responses : Responses
152type alias Responses =
154 , responses : List Comment
157type SortBy = Time | Score | MostResponses
160When you try to expand `Comment` you have to expand `Responses` which needs to expand `Comment` which needs to expand `Responses`, etc.
162So this is just a fancy case of a self-recursive type alias. The solution is the same. Somewhere in that cycle, you need to define an actual `type` to end the infinite expansion.
keysesc to close
- j k
- move down, up
- enter
- open
- esc
- back, or up a level
- 1 2 3 4
- readme, files, commits, refs
- /
- filter
- y
- copy the clone command
- c
- compare the chosen commit with another (or shift-click both)
- ?
- show or hide this list