diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index c28005a5..ab94c008 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -45,16 +45,16 @@ The following checks are all run against the target project by default: Name | Description --------------------------- | ----------- -Active | Did the project get any commits in the last 90 days? -Automatic-Dependency-Update | Does the project use tools to automatically update its dependencies? Binary-Artifacts | Is the project free of checked-in binaries? Branch-Protection | Does the project use [Branch Protection](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/administering-a-repository/about-protected-branches) ? CI-Tests | Does the project run tests in CI, e.g. [GitHub Actions](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/actions), [Prow](https://github.com/kubernetes/test-infra/tree/master/prow)? CII-Best-Practices | Does the project have a [CII Best Practices Badge](https://bestpractices.coreinfrastructure.org/en)? Code-Review | Does the project require code review before code is merged? Contributors | Does the project have contributors from at least two different organizations? +Dependency-Update-Tool | Does the project use tools to help update its dependencies? Fuzzing | Does the project use fuzzing tools, e.g. [OSS-Fuzz](https://github.com/google/oss-fuzz)? -Frozen-Deps | Does the project declare and freeze [dependencies](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/visualizing-repository-data-with-graphs/about-the-dependency-graph#supported-package-ecosystems)? +Maintained | Is the project maintained? +Pinned-Dependencies | Does the project declare and pin [dependencies](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/visualizing-repository-data-with-graphs/about-the-dependency-graph#supported-package-ecosystems)? Packaging | Does the project build and publish official packages from CI/CD, e.g. [GitHub Publishing](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/actions/guides/about-packaging-with-github-actions#workflows-for-publishing-packages) ? SAST | Does the project use static code analysis tools, e.g. [CodeQL](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/finding-security-vulnerabilities-and-errors-in-your-code/enabling-code-scanning-for-a-repository#enabling-code-scanning-using-actions), [SonarCloud](https://sonarcloud.io)? Security-Policy | Does the project contain a [security policy](https://docs.github.com/en/free-pro-team@latest/github/managing-security-vulnerabilities/adding-a-security-policy-to-your-repository)? @@ -119,80 +119,120 @@ The program can run using just one argument, the URL of the repo: ```shell $ go get github.com/ossf/scorecard/v2 -$ scorecard --repo=github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes -Starting [Automatic-Dependency-Update] -Starting [Frozen-Deps] +$ scorecard --repo=github.com/ossf-tests/scorecard-check-branch-protection-e2e +Starting [CII-Best-Practices] Starting [Fuzzing] -Starting [Pull-Requests] -Starting [Branch-Protection] -Starting [Code-Review] -Starting [SAST] -Starting [Contributors] -Starting [Signed-Releases] +Starting [Pinned-Dependencies] +Starting [CI-Tests] +Starting [Maintained] Starting [Packaging] +Starting [SAST] +Starting [Dependency-Update-Tool] Starting [Token-Permissions] Starting [Security-Policy] -Starting [Active] +Starting [Signed-Releases] Starting [Binary-Artifacts] -Starting [CI-Tests] -Starting [CII-Best-Practices] - -Finished [Contributors] -Finished [Signed-Releases] -Finished [Active] -Finished [Binary-Artifacts] +Starting [Branch-Protection] +Starting [Code-Review] +Starting [Contributors] +Starting [Vulnerabilities] Finished [CI-Tests] -Finished [CII-Best-Practices] +Finished [Maintained] Finished [Packaging] -Finished [Token-Permissions] -Finished [Security-Policy] -Finished [Automatic-Dependency-Update] -Finished [Frozen-Deps] -Finished [Fuzzing] -Finished [Pull-Requests] +Finished [SAST] +Finished [Signed-Releases] +Finished [Binary-Artifacts] Finished [Branch-Protection] Finished [Code-Review] -Finished [SAST] +Finished [Contributors] +Finished [Dependency-Update-Tool] +Finished [Token-Permissions] +Finished [Security-Policy] +Finished [Vulnerabilities] +Finished [CII-Best-Practices] +Finished [Fuzzing] +Finished [Pinned-Dependencies] RESULTS ------- -Repo: github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes -Active: Pass 10 -Automatic-Dependency-Update: Fail 3 -Binary-Artifacts: Pass 10 -Branch-Protection: Fail 0 -CI-Tests: Pass 10 -CII-Best-Practices: Pass 10 -Code-Review: Pass 10 -Contributors: Pass 10 -Frozen-Deps: Fail 10 -Fuzzing: Pass 10 -Packaging: Fail 0 -Pull-Requests: Pass 10 -SAST: Fail 10 -Security-Policy: Fail 5 -Signed-Releases: Fail 10 -Token-Permissions: Pass 10 +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCORE | NAME | REASON | DOCUMENTATION/REMEDIATION | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 10 / 10 | Binary-Artifacts | no binaries found in the repo | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#binary-artifacts | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 9 / 10 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection | +| | | maximal on development and all | | +| | | release branches | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ? | CI-Tests | no pull request found | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#ci-tests | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 / 10 | CII-Best-Practices | no badge found | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#cii-best-practices | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 10 / 10 | Code-Review | branch protection for default | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#code-review | +| | | branch is enabled | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 / 10 | Contributors | 0 different companies found -- | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#contributors | +| | | score normalized to 0 | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 / 10 | Dependency-Update-Tool | no update tool detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#dependency-update-tool | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 / 10 | Fuzzing | project is not fuzzed in | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#fuzzing | +| | | OSS-Fuzz | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 1 / 10 | Maintained | 2 commit(s) found in the last | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#maintained | +| | | 90 days -- score normalized to | | +| | | 1 | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ? | Packaging | no published package detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#packaging | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 8 / 10 | Pinned-Dependencies | unpinned dependencies detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#pinned-dependencies | +| | | -- score normalized to 8 | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 / 10 | SAST | no SAST tool detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#sast | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 0 / 10 | Security-Policy | security policy file not | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#security-policy | +| | | detected | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| ? | Signed-Releases | no releases found | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#signed-releases | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 10 / 10 | Token-Permissions | tokens are read-only in GitHub | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#token-permissions | +| | | workflows | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 10 / 10 | Vulnerabilities | no vulnerabilities detected | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#vulnerabilities | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| ``` For more details why a check fails, use the `--show-details` option: ``` -./scorecard --repo=github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes --checks Frozen-Deps --show-details -Starting [Frozen-Deps] -Finished [Frozen-Deps] +./scorecard --repo=github.com/ossf-tests/scorecard-check-branch-protection-e2e --checks Branch-Protection --show-details +Starting [Pinned-Dependencies] +Finished [Pinned-Dependencies] -## RESULTS - -Repo: github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes -Frozen-Deps: Fail 10 -... -!! frozen-deps/docker - cluster/addons/fluentd-elasticsearch/es-image/Dockerfile has non-pinned dependency 'golang:1.16.5' -... -!! frozen-deps/fetch-execute - cluster/gce/util.sh is fetching and executing non-pinned program 'curl https://sdk.cloud.google.com | bash' -... -!! frozen-deps/fetch-execute - hack/jenkins/benchmark-dockerized.sh is fetching an non-pinned dependency 'GO111MODULE=on go install github.com/cespare/prettybench' -... +RESULTS +------- +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| SCORE | NAME | REASON | DETAILS | DOCUMENTATION/REMEDIATION | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| +| 9 / 10 | Branch-Protection | branch protection is not | Info: 'force pushes' disabled | github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#branch-protection | +| | | maximal on development and all | on branch 'main' Info: 'allow | | +| | | release branches | deletion' disabled on branch | | +| | | | 'main' Info: linear history | | +| | | | enabled on branch 'main' Info: | | +| | | | strict status check enabled | | +| | | | on branch 'main' Warn: status | | +| | | | checks for merging have no | | +| | | | specific status to check on | | +| | | | branch 'main' Info: number | | +| | | | of required reviewers is 2 | | +| | | | on branch 'main' Info: Stale | | +| | | | review dismissal enabled on | | +| | | | branch 'main' Info: Owner | | +| | | | review required on branch | | +| | | | 'main' Info: 'admininistrator' | | +| | | | PRs need reviews before being | | +| | | | merged on branch 'main' | | +|---------|------------------------|--------------------------------|--------------------------------|---------------------------------------------------------------------------| ``` ### Using a Package manager @@ -211,7 +251,7 @@ Starting [CI-Tests] Starting [CII-Best-Practices] Starting [Code-Review] Starting [Contributors] -Starting [Frozen-Deps] +Starting [Pinned-Dependencies] Starting [Fuzzing] Starting [Packaging] Starting [Pull-Requests] @@ -227,7 +267,7 @@ Finished [Packaging] Finished [SAST] Finished [Code-Review] Finished [Branch-Protection] -Finished [Frozen-Deps] +Finished [Pinned-Dependencies] Finished [Active] Finished [Pull-Requests] Finished [Contributors] @@ -240,7 +280,7 @@ CI-Tests: Pass 10 CII-Best-Practices: Fail 10 Code-Review: Pass 10 Contributors: Pass 10 -Frozen-Deps: Fail 0 +Pinned-Dependencies: Fail 0 Fuzzing: Fail 10 Packaging: Fail 0 Pull-Requests: Fail 9 @@ -307,27 +347,7 @@ on other source control systems. ## Adding a Scorecard Check -If you'd like to add a check, make sure it is something that meets the following -criteria and then create a new GitHub Issue: - -- The scorecard must only be composed of automate-able, objective data. For - example, a project having 10 contributors doesn’t necessarily mean it’s more - secure than a project with say 50 contributors. But, having two maintainers - might be preferable to only having one - the larger bus factor and ability - to provide code reviews is objectively better. -- The scorecard criteria can be as specific as possible and not limited - general recommendations. For example, for Go, we can recommend/require - specific linters and analyzers to be run on the codebase. -- The scorecard can be populated for any open source project without any work - or interaction from maintainers. -- Maintainers must be provided with a mechanism to correct any automated - scorecard findings they feel were made in error, provide "hints" for - anything we can't detect automatically, and even dispute the applicability - of a given scorecard finding for that repository. -- Any criteria in the scorecard must be actionable. It should be possible, - with help, for any project to "check all the boxes". -- Any solution to compile a scorecard should be usable by the greater open - source community to monitor upstream security. +If you'd like to add a check, please see guidance [here](checks/write.md) ## Troubleshooting diff --git a/checks/automatic_dependency_update.go b/checks/dependency_update_tool.go similarity index 90% rename from checks/automatic_dependency_update.go rename to checks/dependency_update_tool.go index 4221b068..0671e155 100644 --- a/checks/automatic_dependency_update.go +++ b/checks/dependency_update_tool.go @@ -25,11 +25,11 @@ const CheckDependencyUpdateTool = "Dependency-Update-Tool" //nolint func init() { - registerCheck(CheckDependencyUpdateTool, AutomaticDependencyUpdate) + registerCheck(CheckDependencyUpdateTool, UsesDependencyUpdateTool) } -// AutomaticDependencyUpdate will check the repository if it contains Automatic dependency update. -func AutomaticDependencyUpdate(c *checker.CheckRequest) checker.CheckResult { +// UsesDependencyUpdateTool will check the repository uses a dependency update tool. +func UsesDependencyUpdateTool(c *checker.CheckRequest) checker.CheckResult { var r bool err := CheckIfFileExists(CheckDependencyUpdateTool, c, fileExists, &r) if err != nil { diff --git a/checks/active.go b/checks/maintained.go similarity index 68% rename from checks/active.go rename to checks/maintained.go index 9860bae1..74730635 100644 --- a/checks/active.go +++ b/checks/maintained.go @@ -23,37 +23,37 @@ import ( ) const ( - // CheckActive is the exported check name for Active. - CheckActive = "Active" - lookBackDays = 90 - commitsPerWeek = 1 - daysInOneWeek = 7 + // CheckMaintained is the exported check name for Maintained. + CheckMaintained = "Maintained" + lookBackDays = 90 + commitsPerWeek = 1 + daysInOneWeek = 7 ) //nolint:gochecknoinits func init() { - registerCheck(CheckActive, IsActive) + registerCheck(CheckMaintained, IsMaintained) } -// IsActive runs Active check. -func IsActive(c *checker.CheckRequest) checker.CheckResult { +// IsMaintained runs Maintained check. +func IsMaintained(c *checker.CheckRequest) checker.CheckResult { archived, err := c.RepoClient.IsArchived() if err != nil { - return checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult(CheckActive, err) + return checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult(CheckMaintained, err) } if archived { - return checker.CreateMinScoreResult(CheckActive, "repo is marked as archived") + return checker.CreateMinScoreResult(CheckMaintained, "repo is marked as archived") } commits, err := c.RepoClient.ListCommits() if err != nil { - return checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult(CheckActive, err) + return checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult(CheckMaintained, err) } tz, err := time.LoadLocation("UTC") if err != nil { e := sce.Create(sce.ErrScorecardInternal, fmt.Sprintf("time.LoadLocation: %v", err)) - return checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult(CheckActive, e) + return checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult(CheckMaintained, e) } threshold := time.Now().In(tz).AddDate(0, 0, -1*lookBackDays) totalCommits := 0 @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ func IsActive(c *checker.CheckRequest) checker.CheckResult { totalCommits++ } } - return checker.CreateProportionalScoreResult(CheckActive, + return checker.CreateProportionalScoreResult(CheckMaintained, fmt.Sprintf("%d commit(s) found in the last %d days", totalCommits, lookBackDays), totalCommits, commitsPerWeek*lookBackDays/daysInOneWeek) } diff --git a/checks/write.md b/checks/write.md index 6425a11f..10830b3c 100644 --- a/checks/write.md +++ b/checks/write.md @@ -1,3 +1,27 @@ +# Requirements for a check + +If you'd like to add a check, make sure it is something that meets the following +criteria and then create a new GitHub Issue to discuss with the team: + +- The scorecard must only be composed of automate-able, objective data. For + example, a project having 10 contributors doesn’t necessarily mean it’s more + secure than a project with say 50 contributors. But, having two maintainers + might be preferable to only having one - the larger bus factor and ability + to provide code reviews is objectively better. +- The scorecard criteria can be as specific as possible and not limited + general recommendations. For example, for Go, we can recommend/require + specific linters and analyzers to be run on the codebase. +- The scorecard can be populated for any open source project without any work + or interaction from maintainers. +- Maintainers must be provided with a mechanism to correct any automated + scorecard findings they feel were made in error, provide "hints" for + anything we can't detect automatically, and even dispute the applicability + of a given scorecard finding for that repository. +- Any criteria in the scorecard must be actionable. It should be possible, + with help, for any project to "check all the boxes". +- Any solution to compile a scorecard should be usable by the greater open + source community to monitor upstream security. + # How to write a check The steps to writting a check are as follow: @@ -25,6 +49,8 @@ The steps to writting a check are as follow: * Use `checker.DetailLogger.Debug()` to provide detail in verbose mode: this is showed only when the user supplies the `--verbosity Debug` option. + * If your message relates to a file, try to provide information such as + the `Path`, line number `Offset` and `Snippet`. 4. If the checks fails in a way that is irrecoverable, return a result with `checker.CreateRuntimeErrorResult()` function: For example, if an error is diff --git a/docs/checks.md b/docs/checks.md index 0a00e111..22a81730 100644 --- a/docs/checks.md +++ b/docs/checks.md @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ please contribute! This check tries to determine if the project is "actively maintained". A project which is not active may not be patched, may not have its dependencies patched, or may not be actively tested and used. A low score is therefore considered `High` risk. -The check currently works by looking for commits within the last 90 days, and outputs the highest score if there are at least 1 commit/week during this period. +The check currently works by looking whether the repo is archived or not. If it is archived, it returns the minimum score. If it is not, the check looks for commits within the last 90 days, and outputs the highest score if there are at least 1 commit/week during this period. **Remediation steps** - There is *NO* remediation work needed here. This is just to indicate your project activity and maintenance commitment. diff --git a/docs/checks/checks.yaml b/docs/checks/checks.yaml index d34a8bd0..7fa9d7cb 100644 --- a/docs/checks/checks.yaml +++ b/docs/checks/checks.yaml @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ # This is the source of truth for all check descriptions and remediation steps. # Run `cd checks/main && go run /main` to generate `checks.json` and `checks.md`. checks: - Active: + Maintained: risk: High tags: supply-chain, security short: Determines if the project is "actively maintained". @@ -26,7 +26,9 @@ checks: dependencies patched, or may not be actively tested and used. A low score is therefore considered `High` risk. - The check currently works by looking for commits within the last 90 days, and + The check currently works by looking whether the repo is archived or not. + If it is archived, it returns the minimum score. If it is not, + the check looks for commits within the last 90 days, and outputs the highest score if there are at least 1 commit/week during this period. remediation: - >- diff --git a/e2e/automatic_deps_test.go b/e2e/dependency_update_tool_test.go similarity index 87% rename from e2e/automatic_deps_test.go rename to e2e/dependency_update_tool_test.go index ad68b1e5..229b59da 100644 --- a/e2e/automatic_deps_test.go +++ b/e2e/dependency_update_tool_test.go @@ -29,9 +29,9 @@ import ( // TODO: use dedicated repo that don't change. // TODO: need negative results. -var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:Automatic-Dependency-Update", func() { - Context("E2E TEST:Validating dependencies are automatically updated", func() { - It("Should return deps are automatically updated for dependabot", func() { +var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:"+checks.CheckDependencyUpdateTool, func() { + Context("E2E TEST:Validating dependencies are updated with a tool", func() { + It("Should return repo uses dependabot", func() { dl := scut.TestDetailLogger{} repoClient := githubrepo.CreateGithubRepoClient(context.Background(), ghClient, graphClient) err := repoClient.InitRepo("ossf", "scorecard") @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:Automatic-Dependency-Update", func() { NumberOfDebug: 0, } - result := checks.AutomaticDependencyUpdate(&req) + result := checks.UsesDependencyUpdateTool(&req) // UPGRADEv2: to remove. // Old version. Expect(result.Error).Should(BeNil()) @@ -62,7 +62,7 @@ var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:Automatic-Dependency-Update", func() { // New version. Expect(scut.ValidateTestReturn(nil, "dependabot", &expected, &result, &dl)).Should(BeTrue()) }) - It("Should return deps are automatically updated for renovatebot", func() { + It("Should return repo uses renovatebot", func() { dl := scut.TestDetailLogger{} repoClient := githubrepo.CreateGithubRepoClient(context.Background(), ghClient, graphClient) err := repoClient.InitRepo("netlify", "netlify-cms") @@ -84,7 +84,7 @@ var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:Automatic-Dependency-Update", func() { NumberOfInfo: 1, NumberOfDebug: 0, } - result := checks.AutomaticDependencyUpdate(&req) + result := checks.UsesDependencyUpdateTool(&req) // UPGRADEv2: to remove. // Old version. Expect(result.Error).Should(BeNil()) diff --git a/e2e/executable_test.go b/e2e/executable_test.go index 893cfe62..84fcda19 100644 --- a/e2e/executable_test.go +++ b/e2e/executable_test.go @@ -52,7 +52,9 @@ var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:executable", func() { for _, c := range data.Checks { switch c.CheckName { - case checks.CheckActive: + case checks.CheckMaintained: + Expect(c.Pass).Should(BeTrue(), c.CheckName) + case checks.CheckDependencyUpdateTool: Expect(c.Pass).Should(BeTrue(), c.CheckName) case checks.CheckBranchProtection: Expect(c.Pass).Should(BeTrue(), c.CheckName) diff --git a/e2e/active_test.go b/e2e/maintained_test.go similarity index 89% rename from e2e/active_test.go rename to e2e/maintained_test.go index 2f07e35b..b76343d1 100644 --- a/e2e/active_test.go +++ b/e2e/maintained_test.go @@ -27,9 +27,9 @@ import ( scut "github.com/ossf/scorecard/v2/utests" ) -var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:Active", func() { - Context("E2E TEST:Validating active status", func() { - It("Should return valid active status", func() { +var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:"+checks.CheckMaintained, func() { + Context("E2E TEST:Validating maintained status", func() { + It("Should return valid maintained status", func() { dl := scut.TestDetailLogger{} repoClient := githubrepo.CreateGithubRepoClient(context.Background(), ghClient, graphClient) err := repoClient.InitRepo("apache", "airflow") @@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ var _ = Describe("E2E TEST:Active", func() { NumberOfInfo: 0, NumberOfDebug: 0, } - result := checks.IsActive(&req) + result := checks.IsMaintained(&req) // UPGRADEv2: to remove. // Old version. Expect(result.Error).Should(BeNil()) diff --git a/pkg/scorecard_result.go b/pkg/scorecard_result.go index 00219eb4..8c2e9486 100644 --- a/pkg/scorecard_result.go +++ b/pkg/scorecard_result.go @@ -87,12 +87,12 @@ func (r *ScorecardResult) AsString(showDetails bool, logLevel zapcore.Level, wri if row.Score == checker.InconclusiveResultScore { x[0] = "?" } else { - x[0] = fmt.Sprintf("%d", row.Score) + x[0] = fmt.Sprintf("%d / %d", row.Score, checker.MaxResultScore) } doc := fmt.Sprintf("github.com/ossf/scorecard/blob/main/docs/checks.md#%s", strings.ToLower(row.Name)) - x[1] = row.Reason - x[2] = row.Name + x[1] = row.Name + x[2] = row.Reason if showDetails { details, show := detailsToString(row.Details2, logLevel) if show { @@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ func (r *ScorecardResult) AsString(showDetails bool, logLevel zapcore.Level, wri } table := tablewriter.NewWriter(os.Stdout) - header := []string{"Score", "Reason", "Name"} + header := []string{"Score", "Name", "Reason"} if showDetails { header = append(header, "Details") }