scorecard/checks/maintained_test.go
naveensrinivasan 2cb654102d ⚠️ Removing the pass field from result (#1853)
- Removing the pass field from result
    - https://github.com/ossf/scorecard/issues/1393

Signed-off-by: naveensrinivasan <172697+naveensrinivasan@users.noreply.github.com>
2022-05-03 11:17:47 -05:00

362 lines
8.5 KiB
Go

// Copyright 2020 Security Scorecard Authors
//
// Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
// you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
// You may obtain a copy of the License at
//
// http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
//
// Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
// distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
// WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
// See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
// limitations under the License.
package checks
import (
"errors"
"testing"
"time"
"github.com/golang/mock/gomock"
"github.com/ossf/scorecard/v4/checker"
"github.com/ossf/scorecard/v4/clients"
mockrepo "github.com/ossf/scorecard/v4/clients/mockclients"
scut "github.com/ossf/scorecard/v4/utests"
)
// ignoring the linter for cyclomatic complexity because it is a test func
// TestMaintained tests the maintained check.
//nolint
func Test_Maintained(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
threeHundredDaysAgo := time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -300)
twoHundredDaysAgo := time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -200)
fiveDaysAgo := time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -5)
oneDayAgo := time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -1)
ownerAssociation := clients.RepoAssociationOwner
noneAssociation := clients.RepoAssociationNone
// fieldalignment lint issue. Ignoring it as it is not important for this test.
someone := clients.User{
Login: "someone",
}
otheruser := clients.User{
Login: "someone-else",
}
//nolint
tests := []struct {
err error
name string
isarchived bool
archiveerr error
commits []clients.Commit
commiterr error
issues []clients.Issue
issueerr error
expected checker.CheckResult
}{
{
name: "archived",
isarchived: true,
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
{
name: "archived",
isarchived: true,
archiveerr: errors.New("error"),
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: -1,
},
},
{
name: "commit lookup error",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
commiterr: errors.New("error"),
issues: []clients.Issue{},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: -1,
},
},
{
name: "issue lookup error",
isarchived: false,
issueerr: errors.New("error"),
issues: []clients.Issue{},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: -1,
},
},
{
name: "repo with no commits or issues",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
{
name: "repo with valid commits",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{
{
CommittedDate: time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -1),
},
{
CommittedDate: time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -10),
},
{
CommittedDate: time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -11),
},
{
CommittedDate: time.Now().AddDate(0, 0, -12),
},
},
issues: []clients.Issue{},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 3,
},
},
{
name: "old issues, no comments",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &threeHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
{
CreatedAt: &twoHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
{
name: "new issues by non-associated users",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &fiveDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
{
name: "new issues with comments by non-associated users",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &fiveDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Comments: []clients.IssueComment{
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
},
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Comments: []clients.IssueComment{
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
{
name: "old issues with old comments by owner",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &twoHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Comments: []clients.IssueComment{
{
CreatedAt: &twoHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
},
{
CreatedAt: &threeHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Comments: []clients.IssueComment{
{
CreatedAt: &twoHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
{
name: "old issues with new comments by owner",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &twoHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Comments: []clients.IssueComment{
{
CreatedAt: &fiveDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
},
{
CreatedAt: &threeHundredDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Comments: []clients.IssueComment{
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 1,
},
},
{
name: "new issues by owner",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &fiveDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &ownerAssociation,
Author: &someone,
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 1,
},
},
{
name: "new issues by non-owner",
isarchived: false,
commits: []clients.Commit{},
issues: []clients.Issue{
{
CreatedAt: &fiveDaysAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &otheruser,
},
{
CreatedAt: &oneDayAgo,
AuthorAssociation: &noneAssociation,
Author: &otheruser,
},
},
expected: checker.CheckResult{
Score: 0,
},
},
}
for _, tt := range tests {
tt := tt // Re-initializing variable so it is not changed while executing the closure below
t.Run(tt.name, func(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
ctrl := gomock.NewController(t)
mockRepo := mockrepo.NewMockRepoClient(ctrl)
mockRepo.EXPECT().IsArchived().DoAndReturn(func() (bool, error) {
if tt.archiveerr != nil {
return false, tt.archiveerr
}
return tt.isarchived, nil
})
if tt.archiveerr == nil {
mockRepo.EXPECT().ListCommits().DoAndReturn(
func() ([]clients.Commit, error) {
if tt.commiterr != nil {
return nil, tt.commiterr
}
return tt.commits, tt.err
},
).MinTimes(1)
if tt.commiterr == nil {
mockRepo.EXPECT().ListIssues().DoAndReturn(
func() ([]clients.Issue, error) {
if tt.issueerr != nil {
return nil, tt.issueerr
}
return tt.issues, tt.err
},
).MinTimes(1)
}
}
req := checker.CheckRequest{
RepoClient: mockRepo,
}
req.Dlogger = &scut.TestDetailLogger{}
res := Maintained(&req)
if tt.err != nil {
if res.Error == nil {
t.Errorf("Expected error %v, got nil", tt.err)
}
// return as we don't need to check the rest of the fields.
return
}
if res.Score != tt.expected.Score {
t.Errorf("Expected score %d, got %d for %v", tt.expected.Score, res.Score, tt.name)
}
ctrl.Finish()
})
}
}