mirror of
https://github.com/pirate/wireguard-docs.git
synced 2024-08-17 04:30:33 +03:00
whoops dunno why I deleted this section before
This commit is contained in:
parent
aac0b307c1
commit
afa96b6a59
@ -267,6 +267,8 @@ More complex topologies are definitely achievable, but these are the basic routi
|
||||
In the simplest case, the nodes will either be on the same LAN or both be publicly accessible. Define directly accessible nodes with hardcoded `Endpoint` addresses and ports so that WireGuard can connect straight to the open port and route UDP packets without intermediate hops.
|
||||
- **Node behind local NAT to public node**
|
||||
When 1 of the 2 parties is behind remote NAT (e.g. when a laptop behind NAT connects to `public-server2`), define the publicly accessible node with a hardcoded `Endpoint` and the NAT-ed node without. The connection will be opened from NAT client -> public client, then traffic will route directly between them in both directions as long as the connection is kept alive by outgoing `PersistentKeepalive` pings from the NAT-ed client.
|
||||
**Node behind local NAT to node behind remote NAT (via relay)**
|
||||
Most of the time when both parties are behind NATs, the NATs do srcport randomization makind direct connections infeasible, so they will both have to open a connection to `public-server1`, and traffic will forward through the intermediary bounce server as long as the connections are kept alive.
|
||||
- **Node behind local NAT to node behind remote NAT (via UDP NAT hole-punching)**
|
||||
While sometimes possible, it's generally infeasible to do direct NAT-to-NAT connections on modern networks, because most NAT routers are quite strict about randomizing the srcport, making it impossible to coordinate an open port for both sides ahead of time. Instead, a signaling server (STUN) must be used that stands in the middle and communicates which random srcports are assigned to the other side. Both clients make an initial connection to the public signaling server, then it records the random srcports and sends them back to the clients. This is how WebRTC works in modern P2P web apps. Even with a signalling server and known srcports for both ends, sometimes direct connections are not possible because the NAT routers are strict about only accepting traffic from the original destination address (the signalling server), and will require a new random srcport to be opened to accept traffic from other IPs (e.g. the other client attempting to use the originally communicated srcport). This is especially true for "carrier-grade NATs" like cellular networks and some enterprise networks, which are designed specifically to prevent this sort of hole-punching connection. See the full section below on [**NAT to NAT Connections**](#NAT-to-NAT-Connections) for more information.
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user