2017-01-07 06:15:30 +03:00
|
|
|
{-Advantages of a Visual Representation of Code:
|
2017-01-07 04:29:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-07 06:15:30 +03:00
|
|
|
The following are several admittedly contrived examples demonstrating six
|
|
|
|
of the advantages of displaying code visually instead of textually.
|
2017-01-07 04:29:27 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Display out of order arguments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The function "syntaxGraphToTuple" is a simple function that converts the
|
|
|
|
product type "SyntaxGraph" to a tuple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
syntaxGraphToTuple (SyntaxGraph a b c d e) = (a, b, c, d, e)
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
syntaxGraphToTuple (SyntaxGraph a b c d e) = (a, b, c, d, e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-
|
|
|
|
Below is a version of syntaxGraphToTuple where some of the items in the tuple have
|
|
|
|
been swapped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
badSyntaxGraphToTuple (SyntaxGraph a b c d e) = (e, b, c, d, a)
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
badSyntaxGraphToTuple (SyntaxGraph a b c d e) = (e, b, c, d, a)
|
2017-01-07 06:15:30 +03:00
|
|
|
{-In the Glance image of badSyntaxGraphToTuple, it is immediately apparent that
|
2017-01-07 04:29:27 +03:00
|
|
|
some of the tuple arguments are out of order.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Reduce obfuscation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Glance conveniently eliminates long and unnecessary binding chains. For example,
|
|
|
|
Glance simplifies the following obfuscated function
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y x = g where
|
|
|
|
c = p
|
|
|
|
u = 2 * x
|
|
|
|
v = c
|
|
|
|
p = u
|
|
|
|
g = v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
to just
|
2017-01-07 06:15:30 +03:00
|
|
|
|
2017-01-07 04:29:27 +03:00
|
|
|
y x = 2 * x
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
y x = g where
|
|
|
|
c = p
|
|
|
|
u = 2 * x
|
|
|
|
v = c
|
|
|
|
p = u
|
|
|
|
g = v
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-
|
|
|
|
3. Make recursion visible:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consider the recursive definition of the Fibonacci sequence
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fibs = cons 0 (cons 1 (zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Glance, the recursive usages of fibs are explicitly shown with lines
|
|
|
|
looping from the result back into the nested icon.
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fibs = cons 0 (cons 1 (zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs)))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-
|
|
|
|
4. Simplified syntax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Haskell, there are many ways to write code that means the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, all of these lines of code mean exactly the same thing:
|
|
|
|
y = f (g x)
|
|
|
|
y = f $ g x
|
|
|
|
y = f $ g $ x
|
|
|
|
y = (f . g) x
|
|
|
|
y = f . g $ x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Glance, these are all rendered the same.
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
y = (f . g) x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-
|
|
|
|
A few more examples:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notZero 0 = False
|
|
|
|
notZero _ = True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
and
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notZero x = case x of
|
|
|
|
0 -> False
|
|
|
|
_ -> True
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
are both rendered as
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
notZero x = case x of
|
|
|
|
0 -> False
|
|
|
|
_ -> True
|
|
|
|
{-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Haskell, guards are not expressions, so having multiple levels of guards
|
|
|
|
is quite awkward. The textual function below, for example,
|
|
|
|
requires two superfluous variables, temp1 and temp2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Glance, this sort of code is no problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foo x y
|
|
|
|
| x > 0 = let
|
|
|
|
temp1
|
|
|
|
| y > 0 = 'a'
|
|
|
|
| otherwise = 'b'
|
|
|
|
in temp1
|
|
|
|
| otherwise = let
|
|
|
|
temp2
|
|
|
|
| y > 0 = 'c'
|
|
|
|
| otherwise = 'd'
|
|
|
|
in temp2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
foo x y
|
|
|
|
| x > 0 = let
|
|
|
|
temp1
|
|
|
|
| y > 0 = 'a'
|
|
|
|
| otherwise = 'b'
|
|
|
|
in temp1
|
|
|
|
| otherwise = let
|
|
|
|
temp2
|
|
|
|
| y > 0 = 'c'
|
|
|
|
| otherwise = 'd'
|
|
|
|
in temp2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-In future version of Glance, nested guards/cases could be rendered using a 2D grid.
|
2017-01-07 06:15:30 +03:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Information at a Glance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Let's look again at the factorial function from the README.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
factorial x =
|
|
|
|
if x == 0
|
|
|
|
then 1
|
|
|
|
else x * factorial (x - 1)
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
factorial x =
|
|
|
|
if x == 0
|
|
|
|
then 1
|
|
|
|
else x * factorial (x - 1)
|
|
|
|
{-In the visual version, it is quick and easy to see that the parameter (x)
|
|
|
|
is used exactly three times in the body of the function. In the text,
|
|
|
|
figuring out how many times a parameter is used requires searching through
|
|
|
|
the entire function.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similarly, in the visual image, it is easy to see that "factorial" is recursively
|
|
|
|
called exactly once.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. See the Topology of Code:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assume we have a function "mapFirst" that maps the first item in a tuple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
mapFirst :: (a -> a) -> (a, a) -> (a, a)
|
|
|
|
mapFirst f (x, y) = (x', y) where
|
|
|
|
x' = f x
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
mapFirst f (x, y) = (x', y) where
|
|
|
|
x' = f x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-Now, for whatever reason, we want to write a version of mapFirst where the items
|
|
|
|
in the result tuple are swapped like so:
|
|
|
|
mapFirstAndSwap f (x, y) = (y, x') where
|
|
|
|
x' = f x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
But we make a mistake and accidentally write:
|
|
|
|
badMapFirstAndSwap f (x, y) = (x', x') where
|
|
|
|
x' = f x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When we visualize badMapFirstAndSwap we can immediately see that (f x)
|
|
|
|
is no longer nested, and has become an additional node in the graph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since swapping the values in a tuple should not change the topology of our code,
|
|
|
|
this extra node indicates there is an error in the code.
|
|
|
|
-}
|
|
|
|
badMapFirstAndSwap f (x, y) = (x', x') where
|
|
|
|
x' = f x
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{-
|
|
|
|
If you were curious, here is what the good version of mapFirstAndSwap
|
|
|
|
looks like.
|
2017-01-07 04:29:27 +03:00
|
|
|
-}
|
2017-01-07 06:15:30 +03:00
|
|
|
mapFirstAndSwap f (x, y) = (y, x') where
|
|
|
|
x' = f x
|