With this change, you can now cross compile test cases and run
them on qemu-user. Here is an example to run our test suits in
an emulated ARM32 environment.
$ CC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc \
CXX=arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ \
GCC=arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc \
GXX=arm-linux-gnueabihf-g++ \
OBJDUMP=arm-linux-gnueabihf-objdump \
MACHINE=arm \
QEMU='qemu-arm -L /usr/arm-linux-gnueabihf' \
make -j16 test
Currently, we do not support relaxations of TLS GD/LD relocations
for ARM64. This is in practice not a problem because TLSDESC is used
on ARM64 by default.
However, there's one situation in which not supporting TLS GD/LD
relaxation becomes an issue; static linking. If an executable is
statically-linked, relaxation is mandatory because we can't generate
dynamic relocations for GD/LD relocations.
In this patch, we simply report an error if an object file compiled
with TLS GD/LD is used for creating a statically-linked executable.
This commit fixes all tests on ARM64.
Some `ldd` impls don't support the --version option. We do not
want to show the error message but instead just skip the test
entirely.
https://github.com/rui314/mold/pull/385
After a certain point, it is not expected that there's a remaining
undefined symbol. -noinhibit-exec did not respect that invariant,
which caused a crash bug on ARM64.
This change forces all symbols to be resolved if --noinhibit-exec
is given.
Fixes https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/383
We unset `LANG`, but it looks like `LC_ALL` takes precedence over `LANG`,
so we should set `LC_ALL` to `C`.
Reported at https://github.com/rui314/mold/pull/385
mold 1.1.1 generates `-static-pie` code that works with glibc 2.35 but
segfaults with glibc 2.34 or older.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Erhardt <github@sicherha.de>
Previously, mold did not work with the -static-pie compiler flag.
In order to support static PIE, we need the following:
1. Create a .dynamic section even if it is not a dynamic executable, and
2. do not define __rel_iplt_start/end symbols.
The second part is required to workaround a glibc issue.
Even with these changes, mold-generated executable doesn't work with
old glibc versions. But I think it's OK because -static-pie is relatively
new option and you need a newer toolchain anyway.
It looks like the glibc loader does not use this field in the dynamic
section. GNU ld, gold and LLVM lld don't create this. So I think we
can just follow suit.
Usually, init_array is readable and writable, but it looks like rustc
with `-C lto=fat` create a read-only .init_array. mold used to create
two output .init_array sections for read/write and read-only
init_array input sections. That caused one of them are not executed
on startup.
Now, mold create read/write .init_array output section even if an
input .init_array section is read-only.
Fixes https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/363
When we relax R_X86_64_TLSGD or R_X86_64_TLSGD, we rewrite two
instructions (the one referred by TLSGD/TLSLD and the following one
referred by the following relocation). The second instruction is
usually 5 bytes, but if it can be longer than that, and if that's the
case, we need to emit a nop to fill the gap at the end of the longer
instruction.
We didn't do that. As a result, the remaining garbage of the second
instruction is executed and caused an unpredictable result (illegal
instruction or segv).
This patch fixes the issue.
Fixes https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/360
This option reverse input sections before assigning offsets to them.
This is useful to detect an unintended dependency between static
initializers in different translation units. C++ only guarantees that
static initializers are invoked from top to bottom in a single
translation unit, and it doesn't guaratee anything about the order of
initialization between translation units.
By (partially) reversing the contents of .init_array using
--reverse-sections, you can run your program with a completely
reversed initialization order.
The test expects an error when an object compiled with `-fno-PIC` is
linked with `-pie`, but that doesn't happen on aarch64.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Erhardt <github@sicherha.de>
In the previous commit (c325cc039a),
I argued that PC-relative relocations are not representable if they
refer absolute symbols, and I made a change so that such relocations
are handled as errors.
Even though what I did is technically correct, that results in a failure
of an important use case of the weak undefined symbol. Here is why.
If you have an weak undefined symbol `foo`, you would use it as follows:
if (foo)
foo();
If `foo` is defined (i.e. has an address other than 0), `foo` is called.
If `foo` is undefined (i.e. has the address 0), the subsequent CALL
instruction will have an offset from the CALL instruction to address 0.
That displacement is computed at link-time. If the output is position-
independent, the call instruction may not have a correct displacement
from address 0 to the instruction at runtime due to base relocation.
However, that's not a problem in practice, because the function call
is guarded by `if (foo)`, and that will always evaluated to false
if `foo` is undefined. Therefore, the faulty `CALL` instruction will
never be executed.
So, that means we need to relocate PC-relative relocations against
absolute symbols even if doing so results in an incorrect result.
This patch implement that.
PC-relative relocations against absolute symbols are not representable
in position-independent code. In order to support such relocations,
someone has to compute `S + A - P` or subtract `B` as a base relocation,
but such dynamic relocations don't exist.
This is contrary to non-PC-relative relocations against non-absolute
symbols. In this case, we can simply use the base relocation (e.g.
R_X86_64_RELATIVE).
https://github.com/rui314/mold/issues/348
It looks like the option is supported only by gold, and it doesn't
make much sense to me to have this option along with more generic
--warn-textrel. So I want to remove this before the next release.
This patch removes the --shuffle-sections option that takes an
argument as I'm still thinking about a better name for the option.
You can still use `--shuffle-sections` that doesn't take an argument.
