Commit Graph

23 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Alex Crichton
22ca15f81e Bump to 0.2.28 2018-11-12 09:28:01 -08:00
Alex Crichton
6dfbb4be89 Bump to 0.2.27 2018-10-29 14:30:33 -07:00
Alex Crichton
7fad2bf0c8 Bump to 0.2.26 2018-10-29 12:56:37 -07:00
Alex Crichton
c8f2f77480
Merge pull request #954 from alexcrichton/fix-futures
Defer future execution to the next event loop tick
2018-10-23 16:40:31 +02:00
Alex Crichton
a1da85a24b Defer future execution to the next event loop tick
Previously whenever a future readiness notification came in we would
immediately start polling a future. This ends up having two downsides,
however:

* First, the stack depth may run a risk of getting blown. There's no
  recursion limit to defer execution to later, which means that if
  futures are always ready we'll keep making the stack deeper.

* Second, and more worrisome in the near term, apparently future
  adapaters in the `futures` crate (namely the unsync oneshot channel)
  doesn't actually work if you immediately poll on readiness. This may
  or may not be a bug in the `futures` crate but it's good to fix it
  here anyway.

As a result whenever a future is ready to get polled again we defer its
polling to the next turn of the event loop. This should ensure that the
current call stack is always drained and we're effectively enqueueing
the future to be polled in the near future.
2018-10-23 07:12:54 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
dd82a3e134 Bump to 0.2.25 2018-10-10 13:19:40 -07:00
Alex Crichton
c210ccd596 Bump to 0.2.24 2018-10-05 09:53:19 -07:00
Alex Crichton
7ecf4aae87 cargo +nightly fmt --all
Rustfmt all the things!
2018-09-26 08:26:00 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
f834a427d7 Bump to version 0.2.23 (and js-sys and wasm-bindgen-futures to 0.3.0) 2018-09-26 07:31:54 -07:00
Alex Crichton
51ec485c94 Bump to 0.2.22 2018-09-21 13:41:58 -07:00
Alex Crichton
f18b10ca52 Bump to 0.2.21 2018-09-06 22:10:11 -07:00
Alex Crichton
9d5898ab48 Bump to 0.2.20 2018-09-06 14:49:43 -07:00
Alex Crichton
d9bc0a3176 Bump to 0.2.19 2018-08-27 13:39:23 -07:00
Alex Crichton
98008b9e77 Bump to 0.2.18
At the same time, also add a `publish.rs` script to ease our publishing woes.
2018-08-27 13:37:55 -07:00
Alex Crichton
d4297ad2d3 Remove use_extern_macros features
This has now been stabilized!
2018-08-19 14:33:01 -07:00
Alex Crichton
57693ee11a Bump to 0.2.17 2018-08-16 23:36:42 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
f4012defac futures: Add metadata to Cargo.toml 2018-08-13 14:35:35 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
a434880229 Bump js-sys to 0.2.1 2018-08-13 14:32:52 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
8974a57fb9 Bump to version 0.2.16 2018-08-13 14:27:10 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
ff83594882 futures: Add sanity tests for conversion between Promises and Futures
Part of #614
2018-08-09 16:21:49 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
e3011d629e js-sys: Promise methods should take JS things by shared reference 2018-08-09 13:08:30 -07:00
Nick Fitzgerald
170f20e1fd futures: Add more documentation and example usage
Adds an example future that becomes ready on the next tick of the JavaScript
micro task queue.

Part of #614
2018-08-08 17:44:38 -07:00
Alex Crichton
eee71de0ce
Support asynchronous tests (#600)
* Tweak the implementation of heap closures

This commit updates the implementation of the `Closure` type to internally store
an `Rc` and be suitable for dropping a `Closure` during the execution of the
closure. This is currently needed for promises but may be generally useful as
well!

* Support asynchronous tests

This commit adds support for executing tests asynchronously. This is modeled
by tests returning a `Future` instead of simply executing inline, and is
signified with `#[wasm_bindgen_test(async)]`.

Support for this is added through a new `wasm-bindgen-futures` crate which is a
binding between the `futures` crate and JS `Promise` objects.

Lots more details can be found in the details of the commit, but one of the end
results is that the `web-sys` tests are now entirely contained in the same test
suite and don't need `npm install` to be run to execute them!

* Review tweaks

* Add some bindings for `Function.call` to `js_sys`

Name them `call0`, `call1`, `call2`, ... for the number of arguments being
passed.

* Use oneshots channels with `JsFuture`

It did indeed clean up the implementation!
2018-08-01 15:52:24 -05:00