2008-10-10 12:16:55 +04:00
hledger project notes
2007-07-02 18:36:58 +04:00
2007-08-04 18:51:45 +04:00
"...simplicity of design was the most essential, guiding principle.
Clarity of concepts, economy of features, efficiency and reliability of
implementations were its consequences." --Niklaus Wirth
2008-11-08 20:41:14 +03:00
"The competent programmer is fully aware of the limited size of his own
skull. He therefore approaches his task with full humility, and avoids
clever tricks like the plague." --Edsger Dijkstra
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
We aim to make reliable, maintainable, usable software, sustainably.
- pair programming
- test-driven development
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
- fixes, docs, packaging, testing before features
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
- "bugs" are "errors", as in "the programmer messed up"
- test continuously and thoroughly (code, doc, speed tests/measurement on each commit, release)
- less is more
2007-08-04 18:51:45 +04:00
* to do
2008-11-09 01:20:43 +03:00
** errors
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
** docs/marketing/packaging
*** streamline - less is more
*** automate
**** keep blurbs in sync
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
***** README file
***** hledger.hs module description
***** hledger.cabal description field (exclude home page link)
***** home page description (http://joyful.com/Hledger/editform)
***** mail list description (http://groups.google.com/groups/hledger -> edit welcome msg)
***** gmane description
***** darcsweb description
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
**** keep Options.hs and README option list in sync
2009-04-16 10:33:01 +04:00
**** discover commands for --help
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
**** accouncements
*** document smart dates, period expressions, display expressions
*** develop funding process
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
**** license change ?
**** donate button, see chimoo guy
2009-02-27 07:03:14 +03:00
**** funding document 2009/01
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
=======
funding
=======
vision
======
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
How to grow the hledger project ?
I'm looking for ways to fund active and sustainable hledger
development by me and others.
A secondary goal is to develop new sustainable models and processes
for funding free software developers and other community projects.
This is sometimes the point in a free sw project's development where
the project leader seemingly loses the plot, alienates contributors
and destroys the community's good-will dynamic. I've seen it many
times, but a few have succeeded and I want to be one of them - so
that I can eat, have a modicum of stability and do my best work in
service to the community. At worst, I'll look bad but the project
will still be out there. At best I'll live more easily and joyfully
while serving the cause of Financial Solvency!
2009-01-20 11:43:06 +03:00
So I'm beginning by posting these notes and inviting your thoughts -
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
as much or as little as folks want to give. How could we do this
so that all benefit ?
funding models
==============
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Brainstorming some possible funding models & processes.
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* grants
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
How to find possible grant sources ?
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* con
* getting grant funding is a whole new field to study
* slow and time intensive, I imagine
* donations
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Solicit donations.
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* pro
* simple
* con
* often difficult
* donators do not feel a direct benefit
* shareware
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Release the project under a non-free license, requiring commercial
users to pay the fee on an honour basis (eg).
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* pro
* flexible, low administration, encourages trust
* con
* effectively closed-source ? would inhibit collaboration
* benefit is still indirect, only a proportion will pay
* enforcement/guilt may come into play
* limited-time premium branch
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
The funded version of hledger gets some desirable premium features
before the free version and is closed-source. Funders/customers pay
a fixed price for immediate access to the funded version. Yearly, a
new funded version is released and the old funded version is merged
into the free version. (To gain experience it could be done on a
smaller scale, eg monthly/quarterly.)
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* pro
* all features reach community, predictably
* customers are also community funders
* customers receive direct benefit from paying
* con
* free sw developers compete/outshine the premium branch
* bounties
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Some (or all) feature, bugfix, project management or other tasks are
published with a bounty attached. When the bounty is paid by one or
more funders, the task is performed and delivered. Or, bounty is paid
on completion of task (honour system).
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* pro
* funders receive direct benefit
* bounties using fundable.org (eg)
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
A more organised form of the above, perhaps facilitating trust,
co-funding and larger bounties.
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* pro
* proven process developed by others
* con
* fundable takes a cut
* hosted service
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Offer hosted and managed ledgers, perhaps with premium features, for
a monthly fee
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* pro
* proven model
* clear benefit to customers, especially non-technies
* con
* success of free/self-installed version competes with hosting service
* some will avoid web-hosting their financial data
* customisation
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Offer per-user customisations, possibly to be merged in the trunk,
for a fee
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* support
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Offer user/developer support for a fee
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* training
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Offer application and/or financial training for a fee
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* profit sharing/tithing
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Each period (quarter, half-year, year), donate 10% (eg) to project
contributors and/or supporting projects
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* transparent funding
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
Funding and usage of funds is published on the web as a ledger
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* opaque funding
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
All funding and spending need not be made public
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
strengths
=========
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
hledger has some aptitudes in this area:
2009-01-20 11:55:46 +03:00
* hledger deals with money => hledger users will tend to have some money
* hledger's purpose is to increase financial success => users will feel its value to their bottom line
* hledger is a tool that can support project funding, eg by publishing community funding data
weaknesses
==========
* hledger doesn't have a nice ui yet
* hledger has a limited featureset
* hledger requires work, eg data entry and chart of accounts maintenance
* hledger is geeky
* there is competition
* hledger has no compelling market niche (aside from payment-averse free software users)
competitors/fellow niche inhabitants
====================================
* web apps
* netsuite
* sql-ledger, ledgersmb
* wesabe
* ...
* desktop apps
* quickbooks
* quicken
* ms money
* grisbi
* gnucash
* excel
* ledger!
* ...
2009-01-20 11:21:50 +03:00
2009-02-27 07:03:14 +03:00
***** responses
***** albino
have you considered talking to business who hate their financial sw and going from there
***** gwern
most haskellers have never heard of hledger, sounds arrogant or hubristic to talk of charging for it
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
**** qooxledger
*** better screenshots
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
*** screencasts
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
*** developer docs
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
**** style guide
***** see above
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
**** unsafe things which may fail at runtime
***** incomplete pattern matching
***** error
***** printf
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
*** cabal haddock
*** liveness
**** hledgercommitbot on #ledger
**** show feeds on site ?
***** commits (darcsweb)
***** wiki pages
**** weekly repo activity summary on list
**** available feeds
2009-02-27 07:03:14 +03:00
*** make installation easier
**** on all platforms
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
***** set up binary publishing
***** reduce dependencies
****** drop regexpr
***** split packages ?
***** set up the hours alias
2009-02-27 07:03:14 +03:00
**** on linux
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
***** debian
***** ubuntu
2009-02-27 07:03:14 +03:00
**** on mac
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
***** ports
***** binary
2009-02-27 07:03:14 +03:00
**** on windows
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
***** binary
2009-04-04 13:25:25 +04:00
** testing
*** test for robust ledger file parsing
**** test all ledger file format features
**** clarify hledgerisms in file format - that hledger can read but ledger can't
**** run ledger 3 baseline tests
*** --compare (xml?) output with ledger's ?
*** build with -Wall and anything else useful
*** build with multiple ghc versions
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
*** cabal test
2009-05-24 03:52:00 +04:00
*** release tests
**** cabal install with:
***** ghc 6.8
***** ghc 6.10.x
***** windows
***** linux
***** macos
***** no flags
***** happs flag
***** vty flag
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
** code cleanup
*** seek more modularity
*** try export lists
*** graph and reduce dependencies
*** pair programming
** features/wishlist
2009-04-16 10:33:01 +04:00
*** allow no command or unordered command with pattern args
2009-04-04 01:02:45 +04:00
*** --flat timelog balance report option for clients
*** alternative easy timelog format
*** better web gui
*** nice reports with charts
*** data entry!
*** watching a changing journal
*** actual & effective txn & posting dates ?
*** wide format
*** more date syntax ? last nov, next friday, optional this, week of
*** more period syntax ? every N days, biweekly
*** allow comment lines immediately after or within an entry
*** accept multiple -f files
*** more reliable tidy layout from print
*** parse more file formats - gnucash, qif, ofx, csv..
*** i18n
*** speed
**** optimisation
**** speed regression tests
*** plugins
2008-10-10 12:16:55 +04:00
* misc
** things I want to know
*** time
2007-05-01 09:34:49 +04:00
where have I been spending my time in recent weeks ?
where have I spent my time today ?
what is my status wrt spending plan for this week/month/year ?
what is my current status wrt time spending goals ?
2008-10-10 12:16:55 +04:00
*** money
2007-05-01 09:34:49 +04:00
where have I been spending my money ?
what is my status wrt spending plan for this week/month/year ?
what is my current status wrt spending/savings goals ?
what are all my current balances ?
what does my balance history look like ?
what does my balance future look like ?
are there any cashflow, tax, budgetary problems looming ?
2008-10-10 12:16:55 +04:00
*** charts
2008-05-27 01:13:54 +04:00
[1:27pm] <sm> I have decided I am not getting enough visible day-to-day value out of my ledger, I need more of that to stay motivated
[1:27pm] <Nafai> What do you think will help in that?
[1:27pm] <sm> I think some simple self-updating charts, or even good reports in a visible place
[1:28pm] <sm> something I don't have to spend an hour fiddling with to get answers
[1:38pm] <sm> Nafai: identifying/designing some useful reports/charts seems to be blocking me
[1:39pm] <sm> there are probably some standard ones I should use
[1:40pm] <sm> a graph of daily net worth is probably one of the simplest
[1:58pm] <sm> what else.. a chart of weekly expenses in key categories
[1:58pm] <sm> ditto, monthly
[1:58pm] <sm> a chart of monthly income
[1:59pm] <sm> those three should help me be more clear about cashflow status
[2:00pm] <sm> also I'd like something that shows me how much I am on top of financial tracking - how current my numbers are, when last reconciled etc - at a glance
[2:01pm] <sm> another simple one: current balances in all accounts
[2:01pm] <sm> those would be a great start
[2:04pm] <sm> daily net worth, weekly expense, monthly expense, monthly income, confidence/currentness report, and balance report
[2:05pm] <sm> let's see, which of those 6 would give most payoff right now
[2:05pm] <sm> probably 5
[2:06pm] <sm> how could I measure that ?
[2:06pm] <sm> number of days since last ledger entry..
[2:06pm] <sm> number of ledger entries in last 30 days (compared to average)
[2:07pm] <sm> number of days since last cleared checking entry (indicating an online reconcile)
[2:08pm] <sm> those would be a good start. How do I make those visual
[2:09pm] <sm> well I guess the first step is a script to print them
2007-08-04 18:51:45 +04:00
** data representation
*** http://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0327/
*** http://www.n-heptane.com/nhlab/repos/Decimal/
*** http://www.n-heptane.com/nhlab/repos/Decimal/Money.hs
*** http://www2.hursley.ibm.com/decimal/
2009-01-18 00:03:25 +03:00
** snippets
-- trace a MixedAmount
matrace :: MixedAmount -> MixedAmount
matrace a@(Mixed as) = trace (show as) a
-- normalise and trace a MixedAmount
nmatrace :: MixedAmount -> MixedAmount
nmatrace a = trace (show as) a where (Mixed as) = normaliseMixedAmount a
2009-02-25 08:24:05 +03:00
** http://lwn.net/Articles/314577/
** financial software
*** http://weberp.org
**** http://www.weberp.org/weberp/doc/Manual/ManualContents.php