to Hledger.Cli.
Since the git hash changes whenever any file in the repository changes,
this means Hledger.Cli.Version needs to be recompiled all the time.
Since it is at the bottom of the module hierarchy, this means that the
whole hledger package needs to be recompiled. We instead move the
TemplateHaskell splice to one of the top modules, so much less needs to
be recompiled.
Note: Ghc seems to be able to get out of most of the recompiling a lot
of the time (due to caching?), but this makes things more reliable.
This fixes a reported Stored XSS vulnerability in toBloodhoundJson by
encoding the user-controlled values in this payload into base64 and
parsing them with atob.
In my exploration of the vulnerability with various payloads I and
others crafted, it would appear that this is the only available XSS in
hledger-web in relation to stored accounts and transaction details. If
there is other parts of the UI which may contain user-controlled data,
they should be examined for similar things. In this instance,
protections provided by yesod and other libraries worked fine, but in a
bit of code that hledger-web was generating, the user could insert a
</Script> tag (which is valid HTML and equivalent to </script> but not
caught by the T.Replace that existed in toBloodhoundJson) in order to
switch out of a script context, allowing the parser to be reset, and for
arbitrary JavaScript to run.
The real fix is a bit more involved, but produces much better results:
Content-Security-Policy headers should be introduced, and using
sha256-<hash of script> or a different algorithm, they should be marked
as trusted in the header. This way, if the (in-browser) parser and
hledger-web generator disagree on the source code of the script, the
script won't run. Note that this would still be susceptible to attacks
that involve changing the script by escaping from the string inside it
or something similar to that, which can be avoided additionally by using
either the method used in this commit, or a proper JSON encoder.
The second approach has the advantage of preventing further XSS, to the
extent specified above, in practice, a combination of both should be
used, b64 for embedded data and the CSP sha256-hash script-src over
everything else, which will eliminate all injected or malformed script
blocks (via CSP), in combination with eliminating any HTML closing tags
which might occur in stored data (via b64).
This vulnerability appears to have been first introduced when
autocompletion was added in hledger-web, git tag hledger-0.24, commit
hash: ec51d28839
Test payload: </Script><svg onload=alert(1)//>
Closes#1525
rather than as a postprocessing step. (#1638)
This allows us to have a uniform procedure for balancing transactions,
whether they are normal transactions or forecast transactions, including
dealing with balance assignments, balance assertions, and auto postings.
style amounts according to that argument. journalAddForecast and
journalTransform now return an Either String Journal.
This improves efficiency, as we no longer have to restyle all amounts in
the journal after generating auto postings or periodic transactions.
Changing the return type of journalAddForecast and journalTransform
reduces partiality.
To get the previous behaviour for modifyTransaction, use modifyTransaction mempty.
This is done to be more consistent with future field naming conventions,
and to make automatic generation of lenses simpler. See discussion in
\#1545.
rsOpts -> _rsReportOpts
rsToday -> _rsDay
rsQuery -> _rsQuery
rsQueryOpts -> _rsQueryOpts
reportq from the ReportSpec, rather than being supplied as a separate
option.
This is the same approach used by the other reports, e.g. EntryReport,
PostingReport, MultiBalanceReport. This reduces code duplication, as
previously the reportq had to be separately tweaked in each of 5
different places.
If you call accountTransactionreport, there is no need to separately
derive the report query.
functions to AccountTransactionsReport.
If you use transactionsReport, you should either use entryReport if you
don't require a running total, or using accountTransactionsReport with
thisacctq as Any or None (depending on what you want included in the
running total).
This produces identical results. The only fields used in the TransactionReport were torig, split, and amt.
- torig is the same as in entriesReport
- since transactionsReport calls accountTransactionsReportItems with
None as thisacctq, all accounts are considered ‘other accounts’, so
amt is always zero, and ($if not split && not (mixedAmountLooksZero amt)) never fires.
- So the only thing used is torig, and we can just get that from the
entriesReport.
transactions are balanced possibly using explicit prices, but without
inferring any prices. This is included in --strict mode.
Renames check autobalanced to check balancedwithautoconversion.
instead of a list of Amounts. No longer export Mixed constructor, to
keep API clean (if you really need it, you can import it directly from
Hledger.Data.Types). We also ensure the JSON representation of
MixedAmount doesn't change: it is stored as a normalised list of
Amounts.
This commit improves performance. Here are some indicative results.
hledger reg -f examples/10000x1000x10.journal
- Maximum residency decreases from 65MB to 60MB (8% decrease)
- Total memory in use decreases from 178MiB to 157MiB (12% decrease)
hledger reg -f examples/10000x10000x10.journal
- Maximum residency decreases from 69MB to 60MB (13% decrease)
- Total memory in use decreases from 198MiB to 153MiB (23% decrease)
hledger bal -f examples/10000x1000x10.journal
- Total heap usage decreases from 6.4GB to 6.0GB (6% decrease)
- Total memory in use decreases from 178MiB to 153MiB (14% decrease)
hledger bal -f examples/10000x10000x10.journal
- Total heap usage decreases from 7.3GB to 6.9GB (5% decrease)
- Total memory in use decreases from 196MiB to 185MiB (5% decrease)
hledger bal -M -f examples/10000x1000x10.journal
- Total heap usage decreases from 16.8GB to 10.6GB (47% decrease)
- Total time decreases from 14.3s to 12.0s (16% decrease)
hledger bal -M -f examples/10000x10000x10.journal
- Total heap usage decreases from 108GB to 48GB (56% decrease)
- Total time decreases from 62s to 41s (33% decrease)
If you never directly use the constructor Mixed or pattern match against
it then you don't need to make any changes. If you do, then do the
following:
- If you really care about the individual Amounts and never normalise
your MixedAmount (for example, just storing `Mixed amts` and then
extracting `amts` as a pattern match, then use should switch to using
[Amount]. This should just involve removing the `Mixed` constructor.
- If you ever call `mixed`, `normaliseMixedAmount`, or do any sort of
amount arithmetic (+), (-), then you should replace the constructor
`Mixed` with the function `mixed`. To extract the list of Amounts, use
the function `amounts`.
- If you ever call `normaliseMixedAmountSquashPricesForDisplay`, you can
replace that with `mixedAmountStripPrices`. (N.B. this does something
slightly different from `normaliseMixedAmountSquashPricesForDisplay`,
but I don't think there's any use case for squashing prices and then
keeping the first of the squashed prices around. If you disagree let
me know.)
- Any remaining calls to `normaliseMixedAmount` can be removed, as that
is now the identity function.
This was caused by an circular reference in an untested code path
in getViewData, added some months ago (lines 211-212 in 260283e2:
"lib,cli,ui,web: Introduce ReportSpec, which holds ReportOpts, the day of the report, and the parsed Query.").
This kind of bug unfortunately seems to be easy to create in Haskell,
and sometimes quite tedious to track down.
For this particular case, we should add a suitable test to the hledger-web
test suite, and/or set up a pre-release human test script, like hledger-ui's.
The bug was very obvious to the first downloader of hledger-web 1.20,
but it seems over the last three months nobody used a hledger-web built
from master. Providing and encouraging use of nightly builds could also help.
Replaces the partial HashMap.! with List.elemIndex.
(Although the HashMap is more algorithmically efficient,
its API changed recently, possibly complicating building,
and efficiency is just not going to be an issue here.)
