mirror of
https://github.com/swc-project/swc.git
synced 2024-12-18 19:21:33 +03:00
150 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown
150 lines
6.4 KiB
Markdown
|
# Contributing to swc
|
||
|
|
||
|
Thank you for your interest in contributing to swc! Good places to start are this document, ARCHITECTURE.md, which describes the high-level structure of swc and E-easy bugs on the issue tracker.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Code of Conduct
|
||
|
|
||
|
All contributors are expected to follow our [Code of Conduct].
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Bug reports
|
||
|
|
||
|
We can't fix what we don't know about, so please report problems liberally. This
|
||
|
includes problems with understanding the documentation, unhelpful error messages
|
||
|
and unexpected behavior.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Opening an issue is as easy as following [this link][new-issues] and filling out
|
||
|
the fields. Here's a template that you can use to file an issue, though it's not
|
||
|
necessary to use it exactly:
|
||
|
|
||
|
<short summary of the problem>
|
||
|
|
||
|
I tried this: <minimal example that causes the problem>
|
||
|
|
||
|
I expected to see this happen: <explanation>
|
||
|
|
||
|
Instead, this happened: <explanation>
|
||
|
|
||
|
I'm using <output of `swc --version`>
|
||
|
|
||
|
All three components are important: what you did, what you expected, what
|
||
|
happened instead. Please use https://gist.github.com/ if your examples run long.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Feature requests
|
||
|
|
||
|
Please feel free to open a issue or to send a pr.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Working on issues
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you're looking for somewhere to start, check out the [E-easy][E-Easy] and
|
||
|
[E-mentor][E-mentor] tags.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Feel free to ask for guidelines on how to tackle a problem on [gitter][] or open a
|
||
|
[new issue][new-issues]. This is especially important if you want to add new
|
||
|
features to swc or make large changes to the already existing code-base.
|
||
|
swc's core developers will do their best to provide help.
|
||
|
|
||
|
If you start working on an already-filed issue, post a comment on this issue to
|
||
|
let people know that somebody is working it. Feel free to ask for comments if
|
||
|
you are unsure about the solution you would like to submit.
|
||
|
|
||
|
We use the "fork and pull" model [described here][development-models], where
|
||
|
contributors push changes to their personal fork and create pull requests to
|
||
|
bring those changes into the source repository. This process is partly
|
||
|
automated: Pull requests are made against swc's master-branch, tested and
|
||
|
reviewed. Once a change is approved to be merged, a friendly bot merges the
|
||
|
changes into an internal branch, runs the full test-suite on that branch
|
||
|
and only then merges into master. This ensures that swc's master branch
|
||
|
passes the test-suite at all times.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Your basic steps to get going:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Fork swc and create a branch from master for the issue you are working on.
|
||
|
* Please adhere to the code style that you see around the location you are
|
||
|
working on.
|
||
|
* [Commit as you go][githelp].
|
||
|
* Include tests that cover all non-trivial code. The existing tests
|
||
|
in `test/` provide templates on how to test swc's behavior in a
|
||
|
sandbox-environment. The internal crate `testing` provides a vast amount
|
||
|
of helpers to minimize boilerplate. See [`testing/lib.rs`] for an
|
||
|
introduction to writing tests.
|
||
|
* Make sure `cargo test` passes.
|
||
|
* All code changes are expected to comply with the formatting suggested by `rustfmt`.
|
||
|
You can use `rustup component add --toolchain nightly rustfmt-preview` to install `rustfmt` and use
|
||
|
`rustfmt +nightly --unstable-features --skip-children` on the changed files to automatically format your code.
|
||
|
* Push your commits to GitHub and create a pull request against swc's `master` branch.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Pull requests
|
||
|
|
||
|
After the pull request is made, one of the swc project developers will review your code.
|
||
|
The review-process will make sure that the proposed changes are sound.
|
||
|
Please give the assigned reviewer sufficient time, especially during weekends.
|
||
|
If you don't get a reply, you may poke the core developers on [gitter].
|
||
|
|
||
|
A merge of swc's master-branch and your changes is immediately queued
|
||
|
to be tested after the pull request is made. In case unforeseen
|
||
|
problems are discovered during this step (e.g. a failure on a platform you
|
||
|
originally did not develop on), you may ask for guidance. Push additional
|
||
|
commits to your branch to tackle these problems.
|
||
|
|
||
|
The reviewer might point out changes deemed necessary. Please add them as
|
||
|
extra commits; this ensures that the reviewer can see what has changed since
|
||
|
the code was previously reviewed. Large or tricky changes may require several
|
||
|
passes of review and changes.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Once the reviewer approves your pull request, a friendly bot picks it up
|
||
|
and merges it into swc's `master` branch.
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Contributing to the documentation
|
||
|
|
||
|
TODO
|
||
|
|
||
|
## Issue Triage
|
||
|
|
||
|
Sometimes an issue will stay open, even though the bug has been fixed. And
|
||
|
sometimes, the original bug may go stale because something has changed in the
|
||
|
meantime.
|
||
|
|
||
|
It can be helpful to go through older bug reports and make sure that they are
|
||
|
still valid. Load up an older issue, double check that it's still true, and
|
||
|
leave a comment letting us know if it is or is not. The [least recently
|
||
|
updated sort][lru] is good for finding issues like this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Contributors with sufficient permissions on the Rust-repository can help by
|
||
|
adding labels to triage issues:
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Yellow, **A**-prefixed labels state which **area** of the project an issue
|
||
|
relates to.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Magenta, **B**-prefixed labels identify bugs which are **blockers**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Red, **C**-prefixed labels represent the **category** of an issue.
|
||
|
In particular, **C-feature-request** marks *proposals* for new features. If
|
||
|
an issue is **C-feature-request**, but is not **Feature accepted**,
|
||
|
then it was not thoroughly discussed, and might need some additional design
|
||
|
or perhaps should be implemented as an external subcommand first. Ping
|
||
|
@swc-projcet/swc if you want to send a PR for such issue.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Green, **E**-prefixed labels explain the level of **experience** or
|
||
|
**effort** necessary to fix the issue. [**E-mentor**][E-mentor] issues also
|
||
|
have some instructions on how to get started.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Purple gray, **O**-prefixed labels are the **operating system** or platform
|
||
|
that this issue is specific to.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Orange, **P**-prefixed labels indicate a bug's **priority**.
|
||
|
|
||
|
* Ligth orange, **L**-prefixed labels indicate language related to the bug.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
[gist]: https://gist.github.com/
|
||
|
[new-issues]: https://github.com/swc-project/swc/issues/new
|
||
|
[E-easy]: https://github.com/swc-project/swc/labels/E-easy
|
||
|
[E-mentor]: https://github.com/swc-project/swc/labels/E-mentor
|
||
|
[Code of Conduct]: https://www.rust-lang.org/conduct.html
|
||
|
[gitter]: https://gitter.im/swcproject/Lobby
|
||
|
[`tesitng/lib.rs`]: https://github.com/swc-project/swc/blob/master/testing/src/lib.rs
|
||
|
[irlo]: https://internals.rust-lang.org/
|
||
|
[subcommands]: https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/external-tools.html#custom-subcommands
|