swc/crates/swc_bundler/tests/.cache/deno/6ff7a6b1cf0952d583431673b923b57ecb13760d.ts

// Loaded from https://deno.land/x/graphql_deno@v15.0.0/lib/validation/rules/OverlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule.js


import find from '../../polyfills/find.js';
import objectEntries from '../../polyfills/objectEntries.js';
import inspect from '../../jsutils/inspect.js';
import { GraphQLError } from '../../error/GraphQLError.js';
import { Kind } from '../../language/kinds.js';
import { print } from '../../language/printer.js';
import { getNamedType, isNonNullType, isLeafType, isObjectType, isListType, isInterfaceType } from '../../type/definition.js';
import { typeFromAST } from '../../utilities/typeFromAST.js';

function reasonMessage(reason) {
  if (Array.isArray(reason)) {
    return reason.map(([responseName, subReason]) => `subfields "${responseName}" conflict because ` + reasonMessage(subReason)).join(' and ');
  }

  return reason;
}
/**
 * Overlapping fields can be merged
 *
 * A selection set is only valid if all fields (including spreading any
 * fragments) either correspond to distinct response names or can be merged
 * without ambiguity.
 */


export function OverlappingFieldsCanBeMergedRule(context) {
  // A memoization for when two fragments are compared "between" each other for
  // conflicts. Two fragments may be compared many times, so memoizing this can
  // dramatically improve the performance of this validator.
  const comparedFragmentPairs = new PairSet(); // A cache for the "field map" and list of fragment names found in any given
  // selection set. Selection sets may be asked for this information multiple
  // times, so this improves the performance of this validator.

  const cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames = new Map();
  return {
    SelectionSet(selectionSet) {
      const conflicts = findConflictsWithinSelectionSet(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, context.getParentType(), selectionSet);

      for (const [[responseName, reason], fields1, fields2] of conflicts) {
        const reasonMsg = reasonMessage(reason);
        context.reportError(new GraphQLError(`Fields "${responseName}" conflict because ${reasonMsg}. Use different aliases on the fields to fetch both if this was intentional.`, fields1.concat(fields2)));
      }
    }

  };
}

/**
 * Algorithm:
 *
 * Conflicts occur when two fields exist in a query which will produce the same
 * response name, but represent differing values, thus creating a conflict.
 * The algorithm below finds all conflicts via making a series of comparisons
 * between fields. In order to compare as few fields as possible, this makes
 * a series of comparisons "within" sets of fields and "between" sets of fields.
 *
 * Given any selection set, a collection produces both a set of fields by
 * also including all inline fragments, as well as a list of fragments
 * referenced by fragment spreads.
 *
 * A) Each selection set represented in the document first compares "within" its
 * collected set of fields, finding any conflicts between every pair of
 * overlapping fields.
 * Note: This is the *only time* that a the fields "within" a set are compared
 * to each other. After this only fields "between" sets are compared.
 *
 * B) Also, if any fragment is referenced in a selection set, then a
 * comparison is made "between" the original set of fields and the
 * referenced fragment.
 *
 * C) Also, if multiple fragments are referenced, then comparisons
 * are made "between" each referenced fragment.
 *
 * D) When comparing "between" a set of fields and a referenced fragment, first
 * a comparison is made between each field in the original set of fields and
 * each field in the the referenced set of fields.
 *
 * E) Also, if any fragment is referenced in the referenced selection set,
 * then a comparison is made "between" the original set of fields and the
 * referenced fragment (recursively referring to step D).
 *
 * F) When comparing "between" two fragments, first a comparison is made between
 * each field in the first referenced set of fields and each field in the the
 * second referenced set of fields.
 *
 * G) Also, any fragments referenced by the first must be compared to the
 * second, and any fragments referenced by the second must be compared to the
 * first (recursively referring to step F).
 *
 * H) When comparing two fields, if both have selection sets, then a comparison
 * is made "between" both selection sets, first comparing the set of fields in
 * the first selection set with the set of fields in the second.
 *
 * I) Also, if any fragment is referenced in either selection set, then a
 * comparison is made "between" the other set of fields and the
 * referenced fragment.
 *
 * J) Also, if two fragments are referenced in both selection sets, then a
 * comparison is made "between" the two fragments.
 *
 */
// Find all conflicts found "within" a selection set, including those found
// via spreading in fragments. Called when visiting each SelectionSet in the
// GraphQL Document.
function findConflictsWithinSelectionSet(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, parentType, selectionSet) {
  const conflicts = [];
  const [fieldMap, fragmentNames] = getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType, selectionSet); // (A) Find find all conflicts "within" the fields of this selection set.
  // Note: this is the *only place* `collectConflictsWithin` is called.

  collectConflictsWithin(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, fieldMap);

  if (fragmentNames.length !== 0) {
    // (B) Then collect conflicts between these fields and those represented by
    // each spread fragment name found.
    for (let i = 0; i < fragmentNames.length; i++) {
      collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, false, fieldMap, fragmentNames[i]); // (C) Then compare this fragment with all other fragments found in this
      // selection set to collect conflicts between fragments spread together.
      // This compares each item in the list of fragment names to every other
      // item in that same list (except for itself).

      for (let j = i + 1; j < fragmentNames.length; j++) {
        collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, false, fragmentNames[i], fragmentNames[j]);
      }
    }
  }

  return conflicts;
} // Collect all conflicts found between a set of fields and a fragment reference
// including via spreading in any nested fragments.


function collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap, fragmentName) {
  const fragment = context.getFragment(fragmentName);

  if (!fragment) {
    return;
  }

  const [fieldMap2, fragmentNames2] = getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment); // Do not compare a fragment's fieldMap to itself.

  if (fieldMap === fieldMap2) {
    return;
  } // (D) First collect any conflicts between the provided collection of fields
  // and the collection of fields represented by the given fragment.


  collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap, fieldMap2); // (E) Then collect any conflicts between the provided collection of fields
  // and any fragment names found in the given fragment.

  for (let i = 0; i < fragmentNames2.length; i++) {
    collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap, fragmentNames2[i]);
  }
} // Collect all conflicts found between two fragments, including via spreading in
// any nested fragments.


function collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentName1, fragmentName2) {
  // No need to compare a fragment to itself.
  if (fragmentName1 === fragmentName2) {
    return;
  } // Memoize so two fragments are not compared for conflicts more than once.


  if (comparedFragmentPairs.has(fragmentName1, fragmentName2, areMutuallyExclusive)) {
    return;
  }

  comparedFragmentPairs.add(fragmentName1, fragmentName2, areMutuallyExclusive);
  const fragment1 = context.getFragment(fragmentName1);
  const fragment2 = context.getFragment(fragmentName2);

  if (!fragment1 || !fragment2) {
    return;
  }

  const [fieldMap1, fragmentNames1] = getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment1);
  const [fieldMap2, fragmentNames2] = getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment2); // (F) First, collect all conflicts between these two collections of fields
  // (not including any nested fragments).

  collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fieldMap2); // (G) Then collect conflicts between the first fragment and any nested
  // fragments spread in the second fragment.

  for (let j = 0; j < fragmentNames2.length; j++) {
    collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentName1, fragmentNames2[j]);
  } // (G) Then collect conflicts between the second fragment and any nested
  // fragments spread in the first fragment.


  for (let i = 0; i < fragmentNames1.length; i++) {
    collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentNames1[i], fragmentName2);
  }
} // Find all conflicts found between two selection sets, including those found
// via spreading in fragments. Called when determining if conflicts exist
// between the sub-fields of two overlapping fields.


function findConflictsBetweenSubSelectionSets(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, parentType1, selectionSet1, parentType2, selectionSet2) {
  const conflicts = [];
  const [fieldMap1, fragmentNames1] = getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType1, selectionSet1);
  const [fieldMap2, fragmentNames2] = getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType2, selectionSet2); // (H) First, collect all conflicts between these two collections of field.

  collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fieldMap2); // (I) Then collect conflicts between the first collection of fields and
  // those referenced by each fragment name associated with the second.

  if (fragmentNames2.length !== 0) {
    for (let j = 0; j < fragmentNames2.length; j++) {
      collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fragmentNames2[j]);
    }
  } // (I) Then collect conflicts between the second collection of fields and
  // those referenced by each fragment name associated with the first.


  if (fragmentNames1.length !== 0) {
    for (let i = 0; i < fragmentNames1.length; i++) {
      collectConflictsBetweenFieldsAndFragment(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap2, fragmentNames1[i]);
    }
  } // (J) Also collect conflicts between any fragment names by the first and
  // fragment names by the second. This compares each item in the first set of
  // names to each item in the second set of names.


  for (let i = 0; i < fragmentNames1.length; i++) {
    for (let j = 0; j < fragmentNames2.length; j++) {
      collectConflictsBetweenFragments(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, fragmentNames1[i], fragmentNames2[j]);
    }
  }

  return conflicts;
} // Collect all Conflicts "within" one collection of fields.


function collectConflictsWithin(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, fieldMap) {
  // A field map is a keyed collection, where each key represents a response
  // name and the value at that key is a list of all fields which provide that
  // response name. For every response name, if there are multiple fields, they
  // must be compared to find a potential conflict.
  for (const [responseName, fields] of objectEntries(fieldMap)) {
    // This compares every field in the list to every other field in this list
    // (except to itself). If the list only has one item, nothing needs to
    // be compared.
    if (fields.length > 1) {
      for (let i = 0; i < fields.length; i++) {
        for (let j = i + 1; j < fields.length; j++) {
          const conflict = findConflict(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, false, // within one collection is never mutually exclusive
          responseName, fields[i], fields[j]);

          if (conflict) {
            conflicts.push(conflict);
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
} // Collect all Conflicts between two collections of fields. This is similar to,
// but different from the `collectConflictsWithin` function above. This check
// assumes that `collectConflictsWithin` has already been called on each
// provided collection of fields. This is true because this validator traverses
// each individual selection set.


function collectConflictsBetween(context, conflicts, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive, fieldMap1, fieldMap2) {
  // A field map is a keyed collection, where each key represents a response
  // name and the value at that key is a list of all fields which provide that
  // response name. For any response name which appears in both provided field
  // maps, each field from the first field map must be compared to every field
  // in the second field map to find potential conflicts.
  for (const responseName of Object.keys(fieldMap1)) {
    const fields2 = fieldMap2[responseName];

    if (fields2) {
      const fields1 = fieldMap1[responseName];

      for (let i = 0; i < fields1.length; i++) {
        for (let j = 0; j < fields2.length; j++) {
          const conflict = findConflict(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive, responseName, fields1[i], fields2[j]);

          if (conflict) {
            conflicts.push(conflict);
          }
        }
      }
    }
  }
} // Determines if there is a conflict between two particular fields, including
// comparing their sub-fields.


function findConflict(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive, responseName, field1, field2) {
  const [parentType1, node1, def1] = field1;
  const [parentType2, node2, def2] = field2; // If it is known that two fields could not possibly apply at the same
  // time, due to the parent types, then it is safe to permit them to diverge
  // in aliased field or arguments used as they will not present any ambiguity
  // by differing.
  // It is known that two parent types could never overlap if they are
  // different Object types. Interface or Union types might overlap - if not
  // in the current state of the schema, then perhaps in some future version,
  // thus may not safely diverge.

  const areMutuallyExclusive = parentFieldsAreMutuallyExclusive || parentType1 !== parentType2 && isObjectType(parentType1) && isObjectType(parentType2);

  if (!areMutuallyExclusive) {
    // Two aliases must refer to the same field.
    const name1 = node1.name.value;
    const name2 = node2.name.value;

    if (name1 !== name2) {
      return [[responseName, `"${name1}" and "${name2}" are different fields`], [node1], [node2]];
    }
    /* istanbul ignore next (See https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js/issues/2203) */


    const args1 = node1.arguments ?? [];
    /* istanbul ignore next (See https://github.com/graphql/graphql-js/issues/2203) */

    const args2 = node2.arguments ?? []; // Two field calls must have the same arguments.

    if (!sameArguments(args1, args2)) {
      return [[responseName, 'they have differing arguments'], [node1], [node2]];
    }
  } // The return type for each field.


  const type1 = def1?.type;
  const type2 = def2?.type;

  if (type1 && type2 && doTypesConflict(type1, type2)) {
    return [[responseName, `they return conflicting types "${inspect(type1)}" and "${inspect(type2)}"`], [node1], [node2]];
  } // Collect and compare sub-fields. Use the same "visited fragment names" list
  // for both collections so fields in a fragment reference are never
  // compared to themselves.


  const selectionSet1 = node1.selectionSet;
  const selectionSet2 = node2.selectionSet;

  if (selectionSet1 && selectionSet2) {
    const conflicts = findConflictsBetweenSubSelectionSets(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, comparedFragmentPairs, areMutuallyExclusive, getNamedType(type1), selectionSet1, getNamedType(type2), selectionSet2);
    return subfieldConflicts(conflicts, responseName, node1, node2);
  }
}

function sameArguments(arguments1, arguments2) {
  if (arguments1.length !== arguments2.length) {
    return false;
  }

  return arguments1.every(argument1 => {
    const argument2 = find(arguments2, argument => argument.name.value === argument1.name.value);

    if (!argument2) {
      return false;
    }

    return sameValue(argument1.value, argument2.value);
  });
}

function sameValue(value1, value2) {
  return print(value1) === print(value2);
} // Two types conflict if both types could not apply to a value simultaneously.
// Composite types are ignored as their individual field types will be compared
// later recursively. However List and Non-Null types must match.


function doTypesConflict(type1, type2) {
  if (isListType(type1)) {
    return isListType(type2) ? doTypesConflict(type1.ofType, type2.ofType) : true;
  }

  if (isListType(type2)) {
    return true;
  }

  if (isNonNullType(type1)) {
    return isNonNullType(type2) ? doTypesConflict(type1.ofType, type2.ofType) : true;
  }

  if (isNonNullType(type2)) {
    return true;
  }

  if (isLeafType(type1) || isLeafType(type2)) {
    return type1 !== type2;
  }

  return false;
} // Given a selection set, return the collection of fields (a mapping of response
// name to field nodes and definitions) as well as a list of fragment names
// referenced via fragment spreads.


function getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, parentType, selectionSet) {
  let cached = cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames.get(selectionSet);

  if (!cached) {
    const nodeAndDefs = Object.create(null);
    const fragmentNames = Object.create(null);

    _collectFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, parentType, selectionSet, nodeAndDefs, fragmentNames);

    cached = [nodeAndDefs, Object.keys(fragmentNames)];
    cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames.set(selectionSet, cached);
  }

  return cached;
} // Given a reference to a fragment, return the represented collection of fields
// as well as a list of nested fragment names referenced via fragment spreads.


function getReferencedFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragment) {
  // Short-circuit building a type from the node if possible.
  const cached = cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames.get(fragment.selectionSet);

  if (cached) {
    return cached;
  }

  const fragmentType = typeFromAST(context.getSchema(), fragment.typeCondition);
  return getFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, cachedFieldsAndFragmentNames, fragmentType, fragment.selectionSet);
}

function _collectFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, parentType, selectionSet, nodeAndDefs, fragmentNames) {
  for (const selection of selectionSet.selections) {
    switch (selection.kind) {
      case Kind.FIELD:
        {
          const fieldName = selection.name.value;
          let fieldDef;

          if (isObjectType(parentType) || isInterfaceType(parentType)) {
            fieldDef = parentType.getFields()[fieldName];
          }

          const responseName = selection.alias ? selection.alias.value : fieldName;

          if (!nodeAndDefs[responseName]) {
            nodeAndDefs[responseName] = [];
          }

          nodeAndDefs[responseName].push([parentType, selection, fieldDef]);
          break;
        }

      case Kind.FRAGMENT_SPREAD:
        fragmentNames[selection.name.value] = true;
        break;

      case Kind.INLINE_FRAGMENT:
        {
          const typeCondition = selection.typeCondition;
          const inlineFragmentType = typeCondition ? typeFromAST(context.getSchema(), typeCondition) : parentType;

          _collectFieldsAndFragmentNames(context, inlineFragmentType, selection.selectionSet, nodeAndDefs, fragmentNames);

          break;
        }
    }
  }
} // Given a series of Conflicts which occurred between two sub-fields, generate
// a single Conflict.


function subfieldConflicts(conflicts, responseName, node1, node2) {
  if (conflicts.length > 0) {
    return [[responseName, conflicts.map(([reason]) => reason)], conflicts.reduce((allFields, [, fields1]) => allFields.concat(fields1), [node1]), conflicts.reduce((allFields, [,, fields2]) => allFields.concat(fields2), [node2])];
  }
}
/**
 * A way to keep track of pairs of things when the ordering of the pair does
 * not matter. We do this by maintaining a sort of double adjacency sets.
 */


class PairSet {
  constructor() {
    this._data = Object.create(null);
  }

  has(a, b, areMutuallyExclusive) {
    const first = this._data[a];
    const result = first && first[b];

    if (result === undefined) {
      return false;
    } // areMutuallyExclusive being false is a superset of being true,
    // hence if we want to know if this PairSet "has" these two with no
    // exclusivity, we have to ensure it was added as such.


    if (areMutuallyExclusive === false) {
      return result === false;
    }

    return true;
  }

  add(a, b, areMutuallyExclusive) {
    _pairSetAdd(this._data, a, b, areMutuallyExclusive);

    _pairSetAdd(this._data, b, a, areMutuallyExclusive);
  }

}

function _pairSetAdd(data, a, b, areMutuallyExclusive) {
  let map = data[a];

  if (!map) {
    map = Object.create(null);
    data[a] = map;
  }

  map[b] = areMutuallyExclusive;
}