mirror of
https://github.com/thma/LtuPatternFactory.git
synced 2025-01-07 11:57:50 +03:00
add circleci badge
This commit is contained in:
parent
a1c27c0a4d
commit
af55a63a76
@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
|
||||
# Lambda the Ultimate Pattern Factory
|
||||
|
||||
[![CircleCI](https://circleci.com/gh/thma/LtuPatternFactory.svg?style=svg)](https://circleci.com/gh/thma/LtuPatternFactory)
|
||||
|
||||
My first programming languages were Lisp, Scheme, and ML. When I later started to work in OO languages like C++ and Java I noticed that idioms that are standard vocabulary in functional programming (fp) were not so easy to achieve and required sophisticated structures. Books like [Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Design_Patterns) were a great starting point to reason about those structures. One of my earliest findings was that several of the GoF-Patterns had a stark resemblance of structures that are built into in functional languages: for instance the strategy pattern corresponds to higher order functions in fp (more details see [below](#strategy)).
|
||||
|
||||
Recently, while re-reading through the [Typeclassopedia](https://wiki.haskell.org/Typeclassopedia) I thought it would be a good exercise to map the structure of software [design-patterns](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Software_design_pattern#Classification_and_list) to the concepts found in the Haskell type class library and in functional programming in general.
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user