Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
From PR: #6626Resolves#6763Resolves#6055Resolves#6782
## GTK
I retain the 'Invite by link' feature to prevent any breaking changes.
We could make the invitation by link optional through an admin setting,
allowing users to rely solely on personal invitations.
## Todo
- [x] Add an expiration date to an invitation
- [x] Allow to renew an invitation to postpone the expiration date
- [x] Refresh the UI
- [x] Add the new personal token in the link sent to new user
- [x] Display an error if a user tries to use an expired invitation
- [x] Display an error if a user uses another mail than the one in the
invitation
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Our tests on FE are red, which is a threat to code quality. I'm adding a
few unit tests to improve the coverage and lowering a bit the lines
coverage threshold
# This PR
- Moves dev and ci scripts to the `project.json` file in the
twenty-front package
- Adds a project.json file in the root of the project with the main
start command that start both twenty-server and twenty-front
applications concurrently
- Updates the script command of the root project with the start:prod
command (replacing the start command which will be used in dev with the
help of nx)
- Add a start:prod command in the twenty-front app, replacing the start
command (now used for dev purpose)
Issue ref #4645
@charlesBochet @FelixMalfait please let me know how can I improve it
---------
Co-authored-by: Thaïs Guigon <guigon.thais@gmail.com>
Split from https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/4518
- Setup `@ui/*` as an internal alias to reference `twenty-ui/src`.
- Configures twenty-front to understand the `@ui/*` alias on development
mode, so twenty-ui can be hot reloaded.
- When building on production mode, twenty-front needs twenty-ui to be
built beforehand (which is automatic with the `dependsOn` option).
- Configures twenty-front to understand the `@ui/*` alias when launching
tests, so there is no need to re-build twenty-ui for tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
When writing to the normalized cache (record), it's crucial to use _refs
for relationships to avoid many problems. Essentially, we only deal with
level 0 and generate all fields to be comfortable with their defaults.
When writing in queries (which should be very rare, the only cases are
prefetch and the case of activities due to the nested query; I've
reduced this to a single file for activities
usePrepareFindManyActivitiesQuery 🙂), it's important to use queryFields
to avoid bugs. I've implemented them on the side of query generation and
record generation.
When doing an updateOne / createOne, etc., it's necessary to distinguish
between optimistic writing (which we actually want to do with _refs) and
the server response without refs. This allows for a clean write in the
optimistic cache without worrying about nesting (as the first point).
To simplify the whole activities part, write to the normalized cache
first. Then, base queries on it in an idempotent manner. This way,
there's no need to worry about the current page or action. The
normalized cache is up-to-date, so I update the queries. Same idea as
for optimisticEffects, actually.
Finally, I've triggered optimisticEffects rather than the manual update
of many queries.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
* feat: create a separate package for twenty-ui, extract the pill component with hard-coded theme values into it, and use the component inside twenty-front to complete the setup
* feat: extract the light and the dark theme into twenty-ui and update the AppThemeProvider component inside twenty-front to consume themes from twenty-ui
* fix: create a decorator inside preview.tsx to provide a default theme to storybook development server
* fix: remove redundant type declarations and revert back the naming convention for theme declarations
* fix: introduce a default value for pill label within the story for development server
* fix: introduce the nx script into package.json for twenty-ui and resolve imports for theme type within the package
* fix: remove the pill component from the twenty-front package along with the story for it
* fix: revert the package versions to those before running the nx cli command for storybook init
* feat: update readme to include details for building the ui library and starting the storybook development server
* fix: include details about twenty-ui inside jest.config for twenty-front to complete front-jest job
* - Added preview head for font
- Added theme addon for light/dark switch
- Added ComponentDecorator
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
