- Improve snackbar to enable displaying multi-line message (so far we
only displayed the first few words which was very frustrating)
- Followup on previous issue to enable tim@apple.dev on the demo
workspace (prefilled automatically)
- Fix sentry tracing which had been broken when migrating from v7 to v8
We have a few issues on demo seeding:
- redis metdata cache was not flushed
- server ram graphql schema cache was not cleared on metadata version
increment
Issue #6976
@FelixMalfait
I could not do
```
import { Banner } from 'twenty-ui';
const StyledBanner = styled(Banner)
display: flex;
align-items: center;
padding: ${({ theme }) => theme.spacing(8)};
position: absolute;
border-radius: 8px;
&:hover {
background-color: ${({ theme }) => theme.accent.primary};
}
;
```
The styles wont get overridden for Banner, so for now I styled a new
banner in `UnmatchColumnBanner` which is inconsistent.
I couldnt figure out why css properties are not being overridden, need
help!
@Bonapara
Question -
Should the click work on entire banner or just cheveron? For now it just
on cheveron click.
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0f409e78-a341-4f26-af74-117e4b2775a9
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
- add layer for lambda execution
- add layer for local execution
- add package resolve for the monaco editor
- add route to get installed package for serverless functions
- add layer versioning
Website CD has been broken by the recent addition of typeorm patch in
root package.json
Our current vision is to add npm package to each twenty-package
package.json directly
Continuation of #6644
Now chromium browser is used in workspaces tests instead of firefox and
screenshots after each test are properly saved in one folder when run
from IDE and from terminal using `yarn test:e2e` command
## Features
- Fetch a workflow and display it in a tree with the React Flow library
- The nodes are positioned by an algorithm
- The feature is put behind a feature flag. The `/workflow/:id` route is
disabled if the flag is off.
- I started implementing a right drawer. That's a big WIP and it will be
finished in another PR.
## How to test this feature
1. Create a workflow instance in the database through a GraphQL query.
See below for instructions.
2. After enabling the feature flag, you should be able to see the
workflow you created in the workflows list. To visualize the workflow,
go to the `/workflow/:id` page where the id is the id of the workflow.
See the video for a quick way to do so.
```gql
// First
mutation createWorkflow($data: WorkflowCreateInput!) {
createWorkflow(data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "test"
}
}
// Second
mutation createWorkflowVersion($data: WorkflowVersionCreateInput!) {
createWorkflowVersion (data: $data) {
id
}
}
// Result
{
"data": {
"name": "v1",
"trigger": {
"name": "trigger",
"displayName": "New or Updated Row",
"type": "DATABASE_EVENT",
"settings": {
"eventName": "company.created",
"triggerName": "Company Created"
},
"nextAction": {
"name": "step_1",
"displayName": "Code",
"type": "CODE",
"valid": true,
"settings": {
"serverlessFunctionId": "function_id",
"errorHandlingOptions": {
"retryOnFailure": {
"value": false
},
"continueOnFailure": {
"value": false
}
}
}
}
},
"workflowId": "workflow_id"
}
}
```
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/42bbd98c-5e13-447c-9307-461a18ac2195
Fixes (#6643)
- According to `aws-sdk` v3, each service is packaged as a separate
module, and the codebase uses all of the required AWS services
accordingly. Therefore, removing the direct dependency on `aws-sdk:v2`
to resolve the warning shown in (#6643)
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
This pull request introduces a new `FieldMetadataType` called `ACTOR`.
The primary objective of this new type is to add an extra column to the
following objects: `person`, `company`, `opportunity`, `note`, `task`,
and all custom objects.
This composite type contains three properties:
- `source`
```typescript
export enum FieldActorSource {
EMAIL = 'EMAIL',
CALENDAR = 'CALENDAR',
API = 'API',
IMPORT = 'IMPORT',
MANUAL = 'MANUAL',
}
```
- `workspaceMemberId`
- This property can be `undefined` in some cases and refers to the
member who created the record.
- `name`
- Serves as a fallback if the `workspaceMember` is deleted and is used
for other source types like `API`.
### Functionality
The pre-hook system has been updated to allow real-time argument
updates. When a record is created, a pre-hook can now compute and update
the arguments accordingly. This enhancement enables the `createdBy`
field to be populated with the correct values based on the
`authContext`.
The `authContext` now includes:
- An optional User entity
- An optional ApiKey entity
- The workspace entity
This provides access to the necessary data for the `createdBy` field.
In the GraphQL API, only the `source` can be specified in the
`createdBy` input. This allows the front-end to specify the source when
creating records from a CSV file.
### Front-End Handling
On the front-end, `orderBy` and `filter` are only applied to the name
property of the `ACTOR` composite type. Currently, we are unable to
apply these operations to the workspace member relation. This means that
if a workspace member changes their first name or last name, there may
be a mismatch because the name will differ from the new one. The name
displayed on the screen is based on the workspace member entity when
available.
### Missing Components
Currently, this PR does not include a `createdBy` value for the `MAIL`
and `CALENDAR` sources. These records are created in a job, and at
present, we only have access to the workspaceId within the job. To
address this, we should use a function similar to
`loadServiceWithContext`, which was recently removed from `TwentyORM`.
This function would allow us to pass the `authContext` to the jobs
without disrupting existing jobs.
Another PR will be created to handle these cases.
### Related Issues
Fixes issue #5155.
### Additional Notes
This PR doesn't include the migrations of the current records and views.
Everything works properly when the database is reset but this part is
still missing for now. We'll add that in another PR.
- There is a minor issue: front-end tests are broken since this commit:
[80c0fc7ff1).
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
NEXT_PUBLIC environnement variable values are set at build time and not
run time.
Build is currently performed in Github actions so setting those vars at
runtime has no effect.
We can use a package to automatically pass those variables at runtime
Added:
- An "Ask AI" command to the command menu.
- A simple GraphQL resolver that converts the user's question into a
relevant SQL query using an LLM, runs the query, and returns the result.
<img width="428" alt="Screenshot 2024-06-09 at 20 53 09"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/171685816/57127f37-d4a6-498d-b253-733ffa0d209f">
No security concerns have been addressed, this is only a
proof-of-concept and not intended to be enabled in production.
All changes are behind a feature flag called `IS_ASK_AI_ENABLED`.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
### Overview
This PR introduces significant enhancements to the MessageQueue module
by integrating `@Processor`, `@Process`, and `@InjectMessageQueue`
decorators. These changes streamline the process of defining and
managing queue processors and job handlers, and also allow for
request-scoped handlers, improving compatibility with services that rely
on scoped providers like TwentyORM repositories.
### Key Features
1. **Decorator-based Job Handling**: Use `@Processor` and `@Process`
decorators to define job handlers declaratively.
2. **Request Scope Support**: Job handlers can be scoped per request,
enhancing integration with request-scoped services.
### Usage
#### Defining Processors and Job Handlers
The `@Processor` decorator is used to define a class that processes jobs
for a specific queue. The `@Process` decorator is applied to methods
within this class to define specific job handlers.
##### Example 1: Specific Job Handlers
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('taskQueue')
export class TaskProcessor {
@Process('taskA')
async handleTaskA(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task A with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task A
}
@Process('taskB')
async handleTaskB(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling task B with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for task B
}
}
```
In the example above, `TaskProcessor` is responsible for processing jobs
in the `taskQueue`. The `handleTaskA` method will only be called for
jobs with the name `taskA`, while `handleTaskB` will be called for
`taskB` jobs.
##### Example 2: General Job Handler
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor('generalQueue')
export class GeneralProcessor {
@Process()
async handleAnyJob(job: { id: string, name: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling job ${job.name} with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for any job
}
}
```
In this example, `GeneralProcessor` handles all jobs in the
`generalQueue`, regardless of the job name. The `handleAnyJob` method
will be invoked for every job added to the `generalQueue`.
#### Adding Jobs to a Queue
You can use the `@InjectMessageQueue` decorator to inject a queue into a
service and add jobs to it.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Injectable } from '@nestjs/common';
import { InjectMessageQueue, MessageQueue } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Injectable()
export class TaskService {
constructor(
@InjectMessageQueue('taskQueue') private readonly taskQueue: MessageQueue,
) {}
async addTaskA(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskA', data);
}
async addTaskB(data: any) {
await this.taskQueue.add('taskB', data);
}
}
```
In this example, `TaskService` adds jobs to the `taskQueue`. The
`addTaskA` and `addTaskB` methods add jobs named `taskA` and `taskB`,
respectively, to the queue.
#### Using Scoped Job Handlers
To utilize request-scoped job handlers, specify the scope in the
`@Processor` decorator. This is particularly useful for services that
use scoped repositories like those in TwentyORM.
##### Example:
```typescript
import { Processor, Process, InjectMessageQueue, Scope } from 'src/engine/integrations/message-queue';
@Processor({ name: 'scopedQueue', scope: Scope.REQUEST })
export class ScopedTaskProcessor {
@Process('scopedTask')
async handleScopedTask(job: { id: string, data: any }) {
console.log(`Handling scoped task with data:`, job.data);
// Logic for scoped task, which might use request-scoped services
}
}
```
Here, the `ScopedTaskProcessor` is associated with `scopedQueue` and
operates with request scope. This setup is essential when the job
handler relies on services that need to be instantiated per request,
such as scoped repositories.
### Migration Notes
- **Decorators**: Refactor job handlers to use `@Processor` and
`@Process` decorators.
- **Request Scope**: Utilize the scope option in `@Processor` if your
job handlers depend on request-scoped services.
Fix#5628
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
- Added Linaria to have compiled CSS on our optimized field displays
- Refactored mocks for performance stories on fields
- Refactored generateRecordChipData into a global context, computed only
when we fetch object metadata items.
- Refactored ChipFieldDisplay
- Refactored PhoneFieldDisplay
Current state:
<img width="704" alt="Bildschirmfoto 2024-05-11 um 17 57 33"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/48770548/c979f6fd-083e-40d3-8dbb-c572229e0da3">
I have some things im not really happy with right now:
* If I have different connections it would be weird to display a one_one
or many_one connection differently
* The edges overlay always at one hand at the source/target (also being
a problem with the 3 dots vs 1 dot)
* I would have to do 4 versions of the 3 dot marker variant as an svg
with exactly the same width as the edges wich is not as easy as it seems
:)
* The initial layout is not really great - I know dagre or elkjs could
solve this but maybe there is a better solution ...
If someone has a good idea for one or more of the problems im happy to
integrate them ;)
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
In this PR I'm optimizing a whole RecordTableCell in real conditions
with a complex RelationFieldDisplay component :
- Broke down getObjectRecordIdentifier into multiple utils
- Precompute memoized function for getting chip data per field with
useRecordChipDataGenerator()
- Refactored RelationFieldDisplay
- Use CSS modules where performance is needed instead of styled
components
- Create a CSS theme with global CSS variables to be used by CSS modules
This PR introduces many improvements over the new profiling story
feature, with new tests and some refactor with main :
- Added use-context-selector for getting value faster in display fields
and created useRecordFieldValue() hook and RecordValueSetterEffect to
synchronize states
- Added performance test command in CI
- Refactored ExpandableList drill-downs with FieldFocusContext
- Refactored field button icon logic into getFieldButtonIcon util
- Added RelationFieldDisplay perf story
- Added RecordTableCell perf story
- First split test of useField.. hook with useRelationFieldDisplay()
- Fixed problem with set cell soft focus
- Isolated logic between display / soft focus and edit mode in the
related components to optimize performances for display mode.
- Added warmupRound config for performance story decorator
- Added variance in test reporting
For remotes, we will only create the foreign key, without the relation
metadata. Expected behavior will be:
- possible to create an activity. But the remote object will not be
displayed in the relations of the activity
- the remote objects should not be available in the search for relations
Also switched the number settings to an enum, since we now have to
handle `BigInt` case.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
In this PR:
- Follow up on #5170 as we did not take into account not logged in users
- only apply throttler on root fields to avoid performance overhead
In this PR I'm introducing a new patch on @graphql-yoga/nestjs package.
This patch overrides a previous patch that was made to compute the
conditionnal schema on each request,
Here we use a cache map to compute only once per schema workspace cache
version.
This allows us to have sub 100ms query time.
Previously we had to create a separate API key to give access to chrome
extension so we can make calls to the DB. This PR includes logic to
initiate a oauth flow with PKCE method which redirects to the
`Authorise` screen to give access to server tokens.
Implemented in this PR-
1. make `redirectUrl` a non-nullable parameter
2. Add `NODE_ENV` to environment variable service
3. new env variable `CHROME_EXTENSION_REDIRECT_URL` on server side
4. strict checks for redirectUrl
5. try catch blocks on utils db query methods
6. refactor Apollo Client to handle `unauthorized` condition
7. input field to enter server url (for self-hosting)
8. state to show user if its already connected
9. show error if oauth flow is cancelled by user
Follow up PR -
Renew token logic
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix@twenty.com>
I extracted the init database logic into its own file.
You can now run it with yarn database:init.
Added database entry for GitHub stars.
Do you want me to remove the init route or is it used for something else
?
---------
Co-authored-by: Ady Beraud <a.beraud96@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
