Fix#4244 and #4356
This pull request introduces the new "view groups" capability, enabling
the reordering, hiding, and showing of columns in Kanban mode. The core
enhancement includes the addition of a new entity named `ViewGroup`,
which manages column behaviors and interactions.
#### Key Changes:
1. **ViewGroup Entity**:
The newly added `ViewGroup` entity is responsible for handling the
organization and state of columns.
This includes:
- The ability to reorder columns.
- The option to hide or show specific columns based on user preferences.
#### Conclusion:
This PR adds a significant new feature that enhances the flexibility of
Kanban views through the `ViewGroup` entity.
We'll later add the view group logic to table view too.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
This PR was created by [GitStart](https://gitstart.com/) to address the
requirements from this ticket:
[TWNTY-7539](https://clients.gitstart.com/twenty/5449/tickets/TWNTY-7539).
---
### Description
- Move the utilities/dimensions from twenty-front to twenty-ui and
update imports\
Fixestwentyhq/private-issues#79
---------
Co-authored-by: gitstart-twenty <gitstart-twenty@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Fix all the broken CIs :p
This includes an ongoing effort to simplify test maintenance by having 1
unique source of truth about metadata and data mocks (that will later be
generated from a unique source of seeds: dev = demo = test)
Regressions:
- Unit line coverage: 60 > 55
- Storybook Pages branch coverage: 40 > 35
We will need to write tests to increase those coverage
- RelationFieldDisplay perf: 0.2ms to 0.22ms > We might have a
regression here
- Removed perf story about RawJSON > We will need to re-add it
In this PR:
- revert de-optimization of icons bundle for storybook. This was forcing
the browser to load ~3k files while running stories
- adding lazy loading on Settings route to improve developer experience
(some files will be loaded later)
- fix FE tests: unit, modules stories, pages stories
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
Implement soft delete on standards and custom objects.
This is a temporary solution, when we drop `pg_graphql` we should rely
on the `softDelete` functions of TypeORM.
---------
Co-authored-by: Félix Malfait <felix.malfait@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
In this PR, I'm simplifying storybook setup:
1) Remove build --test configuration that prevent autodocs. We are not
using autodocs at all (the dev experience is not good enough), so I have
completely disabled it.
2) Clarify `serve` vs `test` vs `serve-and-test` configurations
After this PR:
- you can serve storybook in two modes: `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:serve:dev` and `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:serve:static`
- you can run tests agains an already served storybook (this is useful
in dev so you don't have to rebuild everytime to run tests): `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:test`
- you can conbine both: `npx nx run
twenty-front:storybook:serve-and-test:static`
In this PR I'm optimizing a whole RecordTableCell in real conditions
with a complex RelationFieldDisplay component :
- Broke down getObjectRecordIdentifier into multiple utils
- Precompute memoized function for getting chip data per field with
useRecordChipDataGenerator()
- Refactored RelationFieldDisplay
- Use CSS modules where performance is needed instead of styled
components
- Create a CSS theme with global CSS variables to be used by CSS modules
TL;DR:
- removed `--configuration={args.scope}` from `storybook:static:test`
for the `storybook:static` part, as it was making `front-sb-test` jobs
in CI not reuse the cache from the `front-sb-build` job and re-build
storybook every time.
- replaced it with a new `test` configuration which optimizes storybook
build for tests and builds storybook 2x faster.
## Fix storybook:build cache usage in CI
`storybook:static:test` executes two scripts in parallel:
1. `storybook:static`, which depends on `storybook:build`
1.a. it builds storybook first with `storybook:build`, the output
directory is `storybook-static`.
1.b. then it launches an `http-server`, using what has been built in
`storybook-static`
2. `storybook:test` to execute tests (needs the storybook http-server to
be running)
When passing `--configuration=pages` or `--configuration=modules` to
`storybook:static` from step 1, those configurations are passed to the
`storybook:build` script from step 1.a as well.
But for Nx `storybook:build` and `storybook:build --configuration=pages`
(or `modules`) are not the same command, therefore one does not reuse
the cache of the other because they could output completely different
things.
As `front-sb-test` jobs are passing `--configuration={args.scope}` to
`storybook:static`, the cache of the previously executed
`storybook:build` (from `front-sb-build`) is not reused and therefore
each job re-builds Storybook with its own scope, which increases CI
time.
### Solution
- Removed scope configurations from `storybook:static` and
`storybook:build` scripts to avoid confusion.
- `storybook:test` and `storybook:dev` can keep scope configurations as
they can be useful and this doesn't impact storybook build cache in CI.
### Improve Storybook build time for testing
Added the `test` configuration to `storybook:build` and
`storybook:static` which makes Storybook build time 2x faster. It
disables addons that slow down build time and are not used in tests.
This PR introduces a Profiling feature for our story book tests.
It also implements a new CI job : front-sb-test-performance, that only
runs stories suffixed with `.perf.stories.tsx`
## How it works
It allows to wrap any component into an array of React Profiler
components that will run tests many times to have the most replicable
average render time possible.
It is simply used by calling the new `getProfilingStory` util.
Internally it creates a defined number of tests, separated by an
arbitrary waiting time to allow the CPU to give more stable results.
It will do 3 warm-up and 3 finishing runs of tests because the first and
last renders are always a bit erratic, so we want to measure only the
runs in-between.
On the UI side it gives a table of results :
<img width="515" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/26528466/273d2d91-26da-437a-890e-778cb6c1f993">
On the programmatic side, it stores the result in a div that can then be
parsed by the play fonction of storybook, to expect a defined threshold.
```tsx
play: async ({ canvasElement }) => {
await findByTestId(
canvasElement,
'profiling-session-finished',
{},
{ timeout: 60000 },
);
const profilingReport = getProfilingReportFromDocument(canvasElement);
if (!isDefined(profilingReport)) {
return;
}
const p95result = profilingReport?.total.p95;
expect(
p95result,
`Component render time is more than p95 threshold (${p95ThresholdInMs}ms)`,
).toBeLessThan(p95ThresholdInMs);
},
```
Split from https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/pull/4518
- Setup `@ui/*` as an internal alias to reference `twenty-ui/src`.
- Configures twenty-front to understand the `@ui/*` alias on development
mode, so twenty-ui can be hot reloaded.
- When building on production mode, twenty-front needs twenty-ui to be
built beforehand (which is automatic with the `dependsOn` option).
- Configures twenty-front to understand the `@ui/*` alias when launching
tests, so there is no need to re-build twenty-ui for tests.
---------
Co-authored-by: Lucas Bordeau <bordeau.lucas@gmail.com>
