Signing in is a two steps process:
- Checking if the user email is already used
- Checking if the email + password is correct
Those two steps need a captchaToken to be valid. Unfortunately, from
Cloudflare Turnstile doc:
`A token can only be validated once and cannot be consumed twice. Once a
token has been issued, it can be validated within the next 300 seconds.
After 300 seconds, the token is no longer valid and another challenge
needs to be solved`
So we need to generate a new token at each step instead of re-using the
same
* Modified HTML for Algolia Crawler
* Added anchor tags within user-guide headers
To implement Algolia correctly, my changes would need to be deployed
first, as it cannot run on localhost. In the meantime, I simulated
Algolia crawling locally using Cheerio, and it worked successfully on my
end.
## Context
Fixes#5403
Transliteration is now integrated to form validation through the schema.
While it does not impede inputting an invalid value, it impedes
submitting a form that will fail as the transliteration is not possible.
Until then we were only performing the transliteration at save time in
the front-end, but it's best to provide the information as soon as
possible. Later we will add helpers to guide the user (eg "This name is
not valid": https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/issues/5428).
---------
Co-authored-by: Charles Bochet <charles@twenty.com>
We do not update the comment on the local table when a foreign table key
is deleted.
This was not breaking, which is why we did not see it. But comments
should be kept up to date.
---------
Co-authored-by: Thomas Trompette <thomast@twenty.com>
This PR is updating all object metadata entities with the new
decorators, and deleting the old ones.
This way we can use the new TwentyORM with all the standard objects.
---------
Co-authored-by: Weiko <corentin@twenty.com>
## Description
This PR fixes a display issue when editing the company name or the name
of a person where the edit input would be offset to the left instead of
being in the middle.
Fixes#5416
### Type of change
<!-- Please delete options that are not relevant. -->
- [x] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
## Checklist
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
- [x] I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
- [x] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
- [x] My changes generate no new warnings
- [x] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my
feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream
modules
This PR introduces a Profiling feature for our story book tests.
It also implements a new CI job : front-sb-test-performance, that only
runs stories suffixed with `.perf.stories.tsx`
## How it works
It allows to wrap any component into an array of React Profiler
components that will run tests many times to have the most replicable
average render time possible.
It is simply used by calling the new `getProfilingStory` util.
Internally it creates a defined number of tests, separated by an
arbitrary waiting time to allow the CPU to give more stable results.
It will do 3 warm-up and 3 finishing runs of tests because the first and
last renders are always a bit erratic, so we want to measure only the
runs in-between.
On the UI side it gives a table of results :
<img width="515" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/assets/26528466/273d2d91-26da-437a-890e-778cb6c1f993">
On the programmatic side, it stores the result in a div that can then be
parsed by the play fonction of storybook, to expect a defined threshold.
```tsx
play: async ({ canvasElement }) => {
await findByTestId(
canvasElement,
'profiling-session-finished',
{},
{ timeout: 60000 },
);
const profilingReport = getProfilingReportFromDocument(canvasElement);
if (!isDefined(profilingReport)) {
return;
}
const p95result = profilingReport?.total.p95;
expect(
p95result,
`Component render time is more than p95 threshold (${p95ThresholdInMs}ms)`,
).toBeLessThan(p95ThresholdInMs);
},
```
Hi twenty team,
Thanks for making such a great product, it's a pleasure to use and see
the rapid development.
@charlesBochet helped me find this error in my setup
In this PR
1. Enable deletion of relation fields in the product and via the api
(migration part was missing in the api)
3. Change wording, only use "deactivate" and "delete" everywhere (and
not a mix of the two + "disable", "erase")
When user is deleting its account on a specific workspace, we remove it
as if it was a workspaceMember, and if no workspaceMember remains, we
delete the workspace and the associated stripe subscription
- Added github:init to allow full import, as opposed to gitHub:sync
which allows partial sync and therefore respecting Github API Limit
quota.
---------
Co-authored-by: Ady Beraud <a.beraud96@gmail.com>
- Adds an util `toSpliced`. We cannot used the native Javascript
`Array.prototype.toSpliced` method as Chromatic servers don't support
it.
- Makes sure Select field options have sequential positions after
removing an option (form validation schema checks that positions are
sequential and considers options invalid otherwise).
In this PR, we are refactoring two things:
- leverage field.defaultValue for Select and MultiSelect settings form
(instead of option.isDefault)
- use quoted string (ex: "'USD'") for string default values to embrace
backend format
---------
Co-authored-by: Thaïs Guigon <guigon.thais@gmail.com>
After discussing with @charlesBochet, several fixes are needed on
fields:
- [x] Disable Boolean field `defaultValue` edition for now (On
`defaultValue` update, newly created records are not taking the updated
`defaultValue` into account. Setting the `defaultValue` on creation is
fine.)
- [x] Disable Phone field creation for now
- [x] For the Person object, display the "Phone" field as a field of
type Phone (right now its type is Text; later we'll migrate it to a
proper Phone field).
- [x] Fix RawJson field display (displaying `[object Object]` in Record
Table cells).
- [x] In Settings/Data Model, on Relation field creation/edition,
"Object destination" select is not working properly if an object was not
manually selected (displays Companies by default but creates a relation
to another random object than Companies).
Related to #4295
Following #5326, field types other than:
- `FieldMetadataType.Boolean`
- `FieldMetadataType.Currency`
- `FieldMetadataType.Relation`
- `FieldMetadataType.Select`
- `FieldMetadataType.MultiSelect`
Cannot be saved as they are not included in the form validation schema.
This PR makes sure they are included and can therefore be
created/edited.
Closes#4295
Note: for the sake of an easier code review, I did not rename/move some
files and added "todo" comments instead so Github is able to match those
files with their previous version.
