Type classes rock. Alas, their encoding in Scala requires a lot of boilerplate, which doesn't rock. There is inconsistency between projects, where type classes are encoded differently. There is inconsistency within projects, where object-oriented forwarders (aka. ops, syntax) accidentally differ in exact parameter lists or forwarders are missing where they are expected to be. Even in disciplined teams, the bike-shedding opportunities alone are a source of lost productivity.
This project addresses these concerns by introducing first class support for type classes in Scala 2.11. For example:
```scala
import simulacrum._
@typeclass trait Semigroup[A] {
@op("|+|") def append(x: A, y: A): A
}
```
Given this definition, something similar to the following is generated at compile time:
This isn't exactly what's generated -- for instance, the `Adapter` class is really generated as a trait to support various subtyping cases. Subtyping of type classes is supported (e.g., you can define a `Monoid` type class that extends `Semigroup` and the generated code adapts accordingly). Higher kinds are also supported -- specifically, type classes that are polymorphic over type constructors, like `Functor`. The current implementation only supports unary type constructors, but support for binary type constructors is planned.
Feedback is much appreciated. The generated code is a result of working with project leads of a variety of open source projects that use type classes. However, there's certainly room for improvement, so please open issues or PRs containing feedback. Also, see the [TODO.md](TODO.md) file for near term improvements.
- When defining a type class as a subtype of another type class, and defining an abstract member of the super type concretely in the sub type, the `override` keyword must be used. For example, defining `map` in terms of `flatMap` requires `override def map[A, B](...)`.