@@ -72,12 +72,12 @@ polymorphism relies on genericity.
7272### Dry arms
7373
7474For a dry arm, we apply the Liskov substitution principle: we
75−ask, "can we use any `p` as if it was a `q.q`"? This is the same
75+ask, "can we use any `p` as if it was a `q.q`?" This is the same
7676test as in `:cast` or any type comparison (`nest`). Intuitively,
77−we ask: is the new payload compatible with the old payload?
77+we ask: "is the new payload compatible with the old payload?"
7878
7979For a core `a`, if `p.a` fits in `q.q.a`, we can use arms on the
80−core. The product of an dry arm whose twig is `b` is always
80+core. The product of a dry arm whose twig is `b` is always
8181defined as `{$hold a(p q.q.a, p.q %gold) b}`.
8282
8383In other words, the subject of the arm computation is the
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@ call in most languages.
8989
9090Dry polymorphism works by substituting cores. Typically, the
9191the programmer uses one core as an interface definition, then
92−replace it with another core which does something useful.
92+replaces it with another core which does something useful.
9393
9494For core `b` to nest within core `a`, the batteries of `a` and
9595`b` must have the same tree shape, and the product of each `b`
@@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ is gold; a gold core can be cast or converted to any metal, and
108108any metal can be cast or converted to lead.
109109
110110A gold core `a` has a read-write payload; another core `b` that
111−nests within it (ie, can be substituted for it) must be a gold
111+nests within it (i.e., can be substituted for it) must be a gold
112112core whose payload is mutually compatible (`+3.a` nests in `+3.b`,
113113`+3.b` nests in `+3.a`). Hence, *invariant*.
114114
@@ -128,8 +128,8 @@ nests within `+6.a`. Hence, *covariant*.
128128
129129### Wet arms
130130
131−For a wet arm, we ask: suppose this core was actually compiled
132−using `p` instead of `q.q`? Would the Nock formula we generated
131+For a wet arm, we ask: "suppose this core was actually compiled
132+using `p` instead of `q.q`?" Would the Nock formula we generated
133133for `q.q` actually work for a `p` payload?
134134
135135A wet arm with twig `b` in core `a` produces the span `{$hold a