@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ Urbit would be that the Senate makes sweeping changes to the PKI and invites a
252schism like that outlined above.
252schism like that outlined above.
254For these reasons, there are strong disincentives for any one organization or
254For these reasons, there are strong disincentives for any one organization or
255−individual to acquire too many galaxies. If galaxy owenship becomes more centralized, individuals will be less incentivized to build on the network which will reduce the value of address space. Furthermore, such centralization might provoke a fork if such centralized powers are perceived as malicious by the users. This is in contrast to real-life republics, where there is little risk
255+individual to acquire too many galaxies. If galaxy ownership becomes more centralized, individuals will be less incentivized to build on the network which will reduce the value of address space. Furthermore, such centralization might provoke a fork if such centralized powers are perceived as malicious by the users. This is in contrast to real-life republics, where there is little risk
256for one party to accumulate as much power as they can manage since the cost to
256for one party to accumulate as much power as they can manage since the cost to
257the citizens to overthrow that power is enormous. Thus, only especially
257the citizens to overthrow that power is enormous. Thus, only especially
258egregious displays of power ever result in rebellion. Within the Urbit republic,
258egregious displays of power ever result in rebellion. Within the Urbit republic,