Fix ambiguity in hoon-syntax.md
Change "have another irregular form" -> "contain another irregular form". "have another irregular form" can too easily be read as "admit another irregular form", which is incorrect.
commit7cc1d7d29b3a65e275e3462e2df615c6397411e0
authorDaniel Povey <dpovey@gmail.com>
dateMon 1 Nov 2021, 13:03 (5 years ago)
parent376e970
content/docs/hoon/hoon-school/hoon-syntax.md+1−1
@@ -254,7 +254,7 @@ The irregular form of the `.=` rune is just `=( )`:
254254%.y
255255```
256256
257−The examples above have another irregular form: `(add 11 11)`. This is the irregular form of `%+`, which calls a [gate](/docs/glossary/gate/) (i.e., a Hoon function) with two arguments for the sample.
257+The examples above contain another irregular form: `(add 11 11)`. This is the irregular form of `%+`, which calls a [gate](/docs/glossary/gate/) (i.e., a Hoon function) with two arguments for the sample.
258258
259259```
260260> %+ add 11 11