Fix wuthep pseudocode
It had the type pattern, but not the noun under test.
commite989d7ab83d455717e3c7e6ceb1a5a469ebd6ab1
authorAaron Sikes <aaron@sikes.io>
dateWed 30 Jan 2019, 07:48 (8 years ago)
parent96cdc5e
reference/hoon-expressions/rune/wut.udon+3−3
@@ -224,9 +224,9 @@ As is usual with inverted forms, use `?.` when the yes-case expression is much t
224224*Pseudocode*: `a`, `b`, `c`, ... as elements of `q`:
225225
226226```
227−?: ?=(p.a) q.a
228−?: ?=(p.b) q.b
229−?: ?=(p.c) q.c
227+?: ?=(p.a p) q.a
228+?: ?=(p.b p) q.b
229+?: ?=(p.c p) q.c
230230...
231231~|(%mint-lost !!)
232232```