pma: cleanup

comment cleanup and removal of dead code
This commit is contained in:
barter-simsum 2024-03-13 11:48:42 -04:00
parent 46ffb737ac
commit c859a5f577

View File

@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ struct BT_state {
int data_fd;
char *path;
void *fixaddr;
/* ;;: TODO: refactor ->map to be a (BT_page *) */
/* TODO: refactor ->map to be a (BT_page *) */
BYTE *map;
BT_meta *meta_pages[2]; /* double buffered */
pgno_t file_size_p; /* the size of the pma file in pages */
@ -379,62 +379,9 @@ struct BT_findpath {
static BT_page *
_node_get(BT_state *state, pgno_t pgno)
{
/* TODO: eventually, once we can store more than 2M of nodes, this will need
to reference the meta page's blk_base array to determine where a node is
mapped. i.e:
- receive pgno
- find first pgno in blk_base that exceeds pgno : i
- sector that contains node is i-1
- appropriately offset into i-1th fixed size partition: 2M, 8M, 16M, ...
*/
/* for now, this works because the 2M sector is at the beginning of both the
memory arena and pma file
*/
/* TODO: wrap in DEBUG macro a looping assert to confirm the given pgno is
contained within a node partition */
assert(pgno >= BT_NUMMETAS);
#if 0
BT_meta *meta = state->meta_pages[state->which];
/* find the partition that contains pgno */
size_t partition_idx = 0;
for (;; partition_idx++) {
assert(partition_idx < BT_NUMPARTS);
pgno_t partition_beg = meta->blk_base[partition_idx];
pgno_t partition_end = partition_beg + B2PAGES(BLK_BASE_LENS_b[partition_idx]);
if (partition_end > pgno) {
assert(partition_beg <= pgno);
break;
}
}
/* ;;: hmm. is there something wrong here? No, I don't think so.
On resume (reading a persistent file):
1) mmap the node partitions.
- (read the offset stored in meta->blk_base)
- mmap the offset + corresponding length of the pma file next to the end
of the last partition in the memory arena. (in memory, nodes are all
stored at the lowest addresses)
calls to _node_get are given a pgno in the persistent file:
1) find the partition that contains this pgno
2) Do math on the pgno + found partition to find the memory address it's
mapped to and return that as a BT_page *
*** We do, however, need to be sure we aren't cheating anywhere and using a
*** page offset into the memory arena and calling _node_get on it. That
*** would technically work for the first partition. It will NOT work for any
*** other partition. Not sure if we are doing that anywhere currently.
*/
#endif
return FO2PA(state->map, pgno);
}
@ -442,7 +389,6 @@ _node_get(BT_state *state, pgno_t pgno)
static pgno_t
_fo_get(BT_state *state, BT_page *node)
{
/* ;;: This may need to be fixed to accommodate partition striping */
uintptr_t vaddr = (uintptr_t)node;
uintptr_t start = (uintptr_t)state->map;
return BY2FO(vaddr - start);
@ -535,8 +481,6 @@ _nlist_grow(BT_state *state)
}
pgno_t memoff_p = B2PAGES(targ - BT_MAPADDR);
/* ;;: tmp assert. debugging. */
assert(&((BT_page *)state->map)[memoff_p] == (BT_page *)targ);
/* add the partition to the nlist */
_nlist_insertn(state,
@ -659,7 +603,7 @@ _bt_nalloc(BT_state *state)
/* make node writable */
if (mprotect(ret, sizeof(BT_page), BT_PROT_DIRTY) != 0) {
DPRINTF("mprotect of node: %p failed with %s", ret, strerror(errno));
abort(); /* ;;: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/6862825/getting-cannot-allocate-memory-error */
abort();
}
return ret;
@ -1078,7 +1022,6 @@ _mlist_insert(BT_state *state, void *lo, void *hi)
continue;
}
/* ;;: i think this chunk can replace the below "found end of list" chunk */
/* otherwise, insert discontinuous node */
BT_mlistnode *new = calloc(1, sizeof *new);
new->lo = lob;
@ -1088,6 +1031,8 @@ _mlist_insert(BT_state *state, void *lo, void *hi)
return;
}
/* TODO: confirm whether this is redundant given discontinuous node insertion
above */
/* found end of list */
BT_mlistnode *new = calloc(1, sizeof *new);
new->lo = lob;
@ -1101,7 +1046,7 @@ _nlist_insert2(BT_state *state, BT_nlistnode **dst, BT_page *lo, BT_page *hi)
{
BT_nlistnode **prev_dst = 0;
while(*dst) { /* ;;: this is a problem */
while(*dst) {
if (hi == (*dst)->lo) {
(*dst)->lo = lo;
/* check if we can coalesce with left neighbor */
@ -1137,7 +1082,6 @@ _nlist_insert2(BT_state *state, BT_nlistnode **dst, BT_page *lo, BT_page *hi)
dst = &(*dst)->next;
continue;
}
}
/* otherwise, insert discontinuous node */
BT_nlistnode *new = calloc(1, sizeof *new);
@ -1145,6 +1089,17 @@ _nlist_insert2(BT_state *state, BT_nlistnode **dst, BT_page *lo, BT_page *hi)
new->hi = hi;
new->next = *dst;
*dst = new;
return;
}
/* TODO: confirm whether this is redundant given discontinuous node insertion
above */
/* found end of list */
BT_nlistnode *new = calloc(1, sizeof *new);
new->lo = lo;
new->hi = hi;
new->next = *dst;
*dst = new;
}
static void
@ -2546,7 +2501,7 @@ _bt_state_load(BT_state *state)
}
/* map the node segment */
_bt_state_map_node_segment(state); /* ;;: this should follow a call to _bt_state_meta_new. hmm... but that leads to a bad dependency graph. We may need to separately initialize the first partition and only call map_node_segment on restore. */
_bt_state_map_node_segment(state);
/* new db, so populate metadata */
if (new) {
@ -3326,37 +3281,3 @@ _bt_printnode(BT_page *node)
fprintf(stderr, "[%5zu] %10x %10x\n", i, node->datk[i].va, node->datk[i].fo);
}
}
/*
re: partition striping, I find the following somewhat confusing.
A pgno for a node could be either:
1) Its actual pgno in the persistent file
2) merely a page offset into the memory arena
The pgno that a parent node stores for a child need not be (1) if the memory
maps are properly restored from the blk_base array in the metapage. Right?
So, on startup:
before traversing nodes, restore the memory map by mapping each partition
successively after the other. Do this for all non-zero page offsets in
blk_base.
If this is done, then _node_get and _fo_get can remain largely unchanged
Is there any reason this won't work?
---------------------------
If we have to do (2) for some reason. Then _node_get and _fo_get /will/ have
to read the blk_base array and appropriately translate using the offsets and
partition sizes.
is _bt_data_cow a problem?
*/