pma: clean comments

This commit is contained in:
barter-simsum 2024-04-04 15:13:45 -04:00
parent a6b12d89bd
commit e437c287a9

View File

@ -1516,7 +1516,7 @@ _bt_insert2(BT_state *state, vaof_t lo, vaof_t hi, pgno_t fo,
/* nullcond: node is a leaf */
if (meta->depth == depth) {
/* dirty the data range */
_bt_dirtydata(node, childidx); /* ;;: I believe this is incorrect. We should just directly modify the dirty bitset in _bt_insertdat */
_bt_dirtydata(node, childidx);
/* guaranteed non-full and dirty by n-1 recursive call, so just insert */
return _bt_insertdat(lo, hi, fo, node, childidx);
}
@ -2212,7 +2212,7 @@ _bt_state_restore_maps(BT_state *state)
static int
_bt_state_meta_which(BT_state *state)
{ /* ;;: TODO you need to mprotect writable the current metapage */
{
BT_meta *m1 = state->meta_pages[0];
BT_meta *m2 = state->meta_pages[1];
int which = -1;
@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ _bt_state_load(BT_state *state)
}
/* map the node segment */
_bt_state_map_node_segment(state); /* ;;: this should follow a call to _bt_state_meta_new. hmm... but that leads to a bad dependency graph. We may need to separately initialize the first partition and only call map_node_segment on restore. */
_bt_state_map_node_segment(state);
/* new db, so populate metadata */
if (new) {
@ -2736,7 +2736,7 @@ _bt_sync(BT_state *state, BT_page *node, uint8_t depth, uint8_t maxdepth)
/* do dfs */
for (size_t i = 0; i < N-1; i++) {
if (!_bt_ischilddirty(node, i)) /* ;;: consider removing case until dirty logic is foolproof */
if (!_bt_ischilddirty(node, i))
continue; /* not dirty. nothing to do */
BT_page *child = _node_get(state, node->datk[i].fo);