shrub/pkg/arvo/gen/hood/yawn.hoon

:-  %say
|=  [^ [=ship pax=$@(~ [=path ~])] ~]
=/  =path
  :: XX remove default path
  ?~  pax  /c/x/1/kids/sys/kelvin
  ?>  ?=([@ *] path.pax)
  =,  pax
  path
[%helm-pass %a %yawn ship path]
ames: add \|yawn, fix duct wrangling 2022-02-24 01:00:20 +03:00			`:- %say`
lull, ames: add %wham to cancel all scry requests (we might want to add permissioning to restrict who can send %whams) 2023-04-01 10:20:49 +03:00			`\|= [^ [=ship pax=$@(~ [=path ~])] ~]`
ames: add \|yawn, fix duct wrangling 2022-02-24 01:00:20 +03:00			`=/ =path`
ames: add all=? flag to fine %yawn task if all=& in \|yawn, it will delete all listeners ducts, without notifying them about it, which seems bad, so we migh adress that separatedly. Also, it might be cleaner to have a separate task instead of a flag, to have two paths for "remove me" and "remove all", this way there won't be an option for a listener to remove all others, and that will have to be handled explicitly. 2023-03-31 16:45:51 +03:00			`:: XX remove default path`
			`?~ pax /c/x/1/kids/sys/kelvin`
ames: add \|yawn, fix duct wrangling 2022-02-24 01:00:20 +03:00			`?> ?=([@ *] path.pax)`
			`=, pax`
ames: add all=? flag to fine %yawn task if all=& in \|yawn, it will delete all listeners ducts, without notifying them about it, which seems bad, so we migh adress that separatedly. Also, it might be cleaner to have a separate task instead of a flag, to have two paths for "remove me" and "remove all", this way there won't be an option for a listener to remove all others, and that will have to be handled explicitly. 2023-03-31 16:45:51 +03:00			`path`
lull, ames: add %wham to cancel all scry requests (we might want to add permissioning to restrict who can send %whams) 2023-04-01 10:20:49 +03:00			`[%helm-pass %a %yawn ship path]`