Make an effort to explain what failed to load and where it came from,
and funnel users to the documentation on font configuration.
The message presented is slightly different depending on whether
we think that the font was their primary font, an explicitly
specified font_rule or an implicitly synthesized font_rule.
refs: #340
Use the scaling factor between the font metrics for the base font
and those of the fallback font selected for a given glyph.
The scenario is this: the base font is typically the first one selected
from the font configuration. There may be multiple fallback fonts that
are different sizes; for instance, the Font Awesome font has glyphs that
are square in aspect and are thus about twice the width of a typical
textual monospace font. Similarly, Noto Color Emoji is another square
font but that has a single set of bitmap strikes at a fixed 128 px
square.
The shaper returns advance metrics in the scale of the containing font,
and the rasterizer will target the supplied size and dpi.
We need to scale these to match the base metrics.
Previously we used a crude heuristic to decide whether to scale,
and that happened to work for Noto Color Emoji but not for Font Awesome,
whose metrics were just inside the bounds of the heuristic.
This commit allows retrieving the metrics for a given font_idx so
that we can compute the correct scale factor without any heuristics,
and applies that to the rasterized glyph.
refs: https://github.com/wez/wezterm/issues/342
This commit moves a bunch of stuff around such that `wezterm` is now a
lighter-weight executable that knows how to spawn the gui, talk to
the mux or emit some escape sequences for imgcat.
The gui portion has been moved into `wezterm-gui`, a separate executable
that doesn't know about the CLI or imgcat functionality.
Importantly, `wezterm.exe` is no longer a window subsystem executable
on windows, which makes interactions such as `wezterm -h` feel more
natural when spawned from `cmd`, and should allow
`type foo.png | wezterm imgcat` to work as expected.
That said, I've only tested this on linux so far, and there's a good
chance that something mac or windows specific is broken by this
change and will need fixing up.
refs: #301
