eb3264c0ad
I found that there may be some minor problems here, in editor.edit may be more dependent on the order of operations, if the same set of operations, different execution orders may lead to some different results, so maybe we need to use BTreeSet instead of HashSet, because HashSet may not be able to ensure that the same set of data order is consistent, but maybe my worries are too much Release notes: - N/A |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
src | ||
test_data | ||
Cargo.toml | ||
LICENSE-GPL | ||
README.md |
This contains the code for Zed's Vim emulation mode.
Vim mode in Zed is supposed to primarily "do what you expect": it mostly tries to copy vim exactly, but will use Zed-specific functionality when available to make things smoother. This means Zed will never be 100% vim compatible, but should be 100% vim familiar!
The backlog is maintained in the #vim
channel notes.
Testing against Neovim
If you are making a change to make Zed's behaviour more closely match vim/nvim, you can create a test using the NeovimBackedTestContext
.
For example, the following test checks that Zed and Neovim have the same behaviour when running *
in visual mode:
#[gpui::test]
async fn test_visual_star_hash(cx: &mut gpui::TestAppContext) {
let mut cx = NeovimBackedTestContext::new(cx).await;
cx.set_shared_state("ˇa.c. abcd a.c. abcd").await;
cx.simulate_shared_keystrokes(["v", "3", "l", "*"]).await;
cx.assert_shared_state("a.c. abcd ˇa.c. abcd").await;
}
To keep CI runs fast, by default the neovim tests use a cached JSON file that records what neovim did (see crates/vim/test_data), but while developing this test you'll need to run it with the neovim flag enabled:
cargo test -p vim --features neovim test_visual_star_hash
This will run your keystrokes against a headless neovim and cache the results in the test_data directory.
Testing zed-only behaviour
Zed does more than vim/neovim in their default modes. The VimTestContext
can be used instead. This lets you test integration with the language server and other parts of zed's UI that don't have a NeoVim equivalent.