mirror of
https://github.com/Orasund/elm-ui-widgets.git
synced 2024-11-22 22:33:33 +03:00
Updated Readme
This commit is contained in:
parent
3b6f8998c3
commit
ec8005aed8
21
README.md
21
README.md
@ -15,12 +15,21 @@ These include:
|
||||
* Validated Input
|
||||
* Scrolling Nav
|
||||
|
||||
Check out the [examples](https://orasund.github.io/elm-ui-widgets/)
|
||||
Examples of all widgets can be found [here](https://orasund.github.io/elm-ui-widgets/). For styling, I used my own [Orasund/elm-ui-framework](https://package.elm-lang.org/packages/Orasund/elm-ui-framework/latest/).
|
||||
|
||||
## Why was this package created
|
||||
## Why create such a package?
|
||||
|
||||
There are two reasons I created this package.
|
||||
After looking at the current packages that implement various reusable views (and components) I noticed two things:
|
||||
|
||||
1. There are no reusable views written from Elm-Ui
|
||||
2. There are a lot of reusable views out there, all trying to reinvent the wheel,
|
||||
and all do it differently. This packages tries to keep the complexity at a minimum and all the widgets consistent with eachother.
|
||||
* There are (nearly) no widgets for Elm-Ui, and that's a problem because while going from `Element` to `Html` is easy, the opposite is not always possible (as a lot of styling in Elm-Ui would not be adapted to the `Html` element.)
|
||||
* There is collection of widgets, all in one place. A lot of components get reimplemented over and over again. It's hard to keep track of what package is currently the best.
|
||||
|
||||
This package tries to solve both of these problems.
|
||||
|
||||
## Why does this package also include components?
|
||||
|
||||
I wrote a component whenever the boilerplate of a similar reusable view is less than just include the wiring in the package.
|
||||
|
||||
## Where will it go from here
|
||||
|
||||
I really would like to write a native material-design implementation in Elm. But after doing this package as a first step, (Which I already wrote while having the material.io docs as reference) I am not quite sure how I can avoid a lot of boilerplating. It seems like a [Master View Type](https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/scaling-elm-views-with-master-view-types/) would be the solution, but I'm not quite sure how I can ensure the customizability when my entire page can be described as a single type. (I don't want to know how many parameters such a type would need).
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user