This pull request fixes the issue of duplicate sources in the model
response and adds metadata to the response. It removes duplicate sources
with the same name and creates a list of unique sources. Additionally,
it includes the generated URLs and sources in the metadata of the model
response.
This pull request refactors the GPT4Brain and KnowledgeBrainQA classes
to add the functionality of saving non-streaming answers. It includes
changes to the `generate_answer` method and the addition of the
`save_non_streaming_answer` method. This enhancement improves the
overall functionality and performance of the code.
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| 🚀 This description was created by
[Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit
997576d577 |
|--------|
### Summary:
This PR involves a significant refactoring of the codebase, with file
and class relocations and renames, and updated import paths, without
introducing new functionality.
**Key points**:
- Significant refactoring of the codebase for improved organization and
clarity.
- File and class relocations and renames.
- Updated import paths to reflect new locations and names.
- No new functionality introduced.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
This pull request updates the CPU and memory settings in the task
definition files for the AWS service. The CPU has been increased from
1024 to 2048, and the memory has been increased from 2048 to 4096. This
change ensures that the service has enough resources to handle the
workload efficiently.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| 🚀 This description was created by
[Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit
1bc415aa66 |
|--------|
### Summary:
This PR enhances the AWS service's resource allocation by doubling the
CPU and memory settings in the task definition files.
**Key points**:
- Updated CPU and memory settings in `/.aws/task_definition.json` and
`/.aws/task_definition_preview.json`.
- CPU value increased from 1024 to 2048.
- Memory value increased from 2048 to 4096.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| 🚀 This description was created by
[Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit
3e95f1a5aa |
|--------|
### Summary:
This PR introduces the 'Quivr Assistants' feature with new frontend
components and pages, backend routes and DTOs changes, and a minor
update in the `processAssistant` function.
**Key points**:
- Introduced the 'Quivr Assistants' feature with new frontend components
and pages, backend routes and DTOs changes.
- Added new `AssistantModal` component in
`/frontend/app/assistants/AssistantModal/AssistantModal.tsx`.
- Added new `InputsStep` and `OutputsStep` components for handling
assistant inputs and outputs.
- Added new `AssistantModal` page in
`/frontend/app/assistants/page.tsx`.
- Added new API endpoints and types for assistants in
`/frontend/lib/api/assistants/assistants.ts` and
`/frontend/lib/api/assistants/types.ts`.
- Updated backend assistant routes and DTOs in
`backend/modules/assistant/controller/assistant_routes.py`,
`backend/modules/assistant/dto/inputs.py`,
`backend/modules/assistant/ito/difference.py`, and
`backend/modules/assistant/ito/summary.py`.
- Made a minor update in the `processAssistant` function in the
`/frontend/lib/api/assistants/assistants.ts` file.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request updates the CPU and memory configurations for the task
definitions in the AWS service. The CPU has been changed from 2048 to
1024, and the memory has been changed from 8192 to 2048. These changes
optimize the resource allocation for the task definitions.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| 🚀 This description was created by
[Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit
c095179818 |
|--------|
### Summary:
This PR optimizes resource allocation by reducing CPU and memory
configurations for task definitions in five AWS service JSON files.
**Key points**:
- Reduced CPU and memory configurations in `task_definition.json`,
`task_definition_preview.json`, `task_definition_preview_beat.json`,
`task_definition_preview_worker.json`, and
`task_definition_prod_worker.json`.
- Optimized resource allocation for task definitions.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request includes a commit that improves the prompt used to get
more insights from the document. The commit modifies the map and reduce
templates to provide clearer instructions for analyzing each section of
the document and generating a consolidated summary. The changes also
include adjustments to the text splitter to improve the chunk overlap.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| 🚀 This description was created by
[Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit
adf5541dab |
|--------|
### Summary:
This PR enhances the document analysis and summary generation
instructions in the `SummaryAssistant` class and improves text splitting
by adjusting the `chunk_overlap` parameter.
**Key points**:
- Updated `map_template` and `reduce_template` in `process_assistant`
method of `SummaryAssistant` class in
`/backend/modules/assistant/ito/summary.py`.
- Adjusted `chunk_overlap` parameter of `CharacterTextSplitter` instance
from 0 to 100.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request fixes an issue where the brain activation and value
handling were not working correctly. The `BrainInput` model now allows
for optional activation and value fields, and an empty string is
converted to `None` using a root validator. This ensures that brain
activation and value can be properly handled in the application.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| 🚀 This description was created by
[Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for commit
d63ed6e651 |
|--------|
### Summary:
This PR modifies the `BrainInput` class in
`/backend/modules/assistant/dto/inputs.py` to make `activated` and
`value` fields optional and adds a root validator to convert empty
strings to `None`.
**Key points**:
- Modified `BrainInput` class in
`/backend/modules/assistant/dto/inputs.py`
- Made `activated` and `value` fields optional with default values
- Added root validator `empty_string_to_none` to convert empty strings
to `None`
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
Hello 👋 from Porter! Please merge this PR to finish setting up your
application.
Co-authored-by: porter-deployment-app[bot] <87230664+porter-deployment-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Hello 👋 from Porter! Please merge this PR to finish setting up your
application.
Co-authored-by: porter-deployment-app[bot] <87230664+porter-deployment-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request refactors the DEFAULT_DOCUMENT_PROMPT in quivr_rag.py
to improve code readability and maintainability. The unnecessary file
name information has been removed from the prompt template as it is now
included in the vector embedding
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit 81939457e6. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR refactors the `DEFAULT_DOCUMENT_PROMPT` in `quivr_rag.py` by
removing the file name information from the prompt template, enhancing
code readability and maintainability.
**Key points**:
- Refactored `DEFAULT_DOCUMENT_PROMPT` in `quivr_rag.py`.
- Removed file name information from the prompt template.
- File name information is now included in the vector embedding.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request fixes the file key validation in the `check_input`
method. Previously, the method only checked if a file was uploaded and
if the key of the file was "doc_to_summarize". However, it did not check
if the key of the file was the same as the name of the file. This PR
adds a check to ensure that the key of the file is the same as the name
of the file. This improves the accuracy of the file validation process.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit 8f04d832ac. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR enhances the file validation process in the `SummaryAssistant`
class by ensuring the key of the uploaded file matches its filename.
**Key points**:
- Added a new file key validation in `check_input` method of
`SummaryAssistant` class.
- The validation checks if the key of the uploaded file matches the
filename.
- This is an additional check to the existing file upload and key
validations.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request increases the token limit for the summary output to
2000 in order to accommodate larger documents.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit 4412ecde83. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR increases the token limit for the summary output to 2000 in the
`SummaryAssistant` class to accommodate larger documents.
**Key points**:
- Increased `max_tokens` parameter in `ChatLiteLLM` instance to 2000 in
`process_assistant` function of `SummaryAssistant` class in
`/backend/modules/assistant/ito/summary.py` file.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request refactors the get_brains_usages method in the
Analytics class. The changes include improving code readability,
optimizing database queries, and fixing potential bugs.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit f0ad664673. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR optimizes the `get_brains_usages` method in the `Analytics`
class by reducing database calls and improving code readability.
**Key points**:
- Refactored `get_brains_usages` method in `Analytics` class.
- Optimized database query to fetch chat history in one go.
- Improved code readability and formatting.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request adds PDF generation functionality and improves the
formatting of emails. It includes a new module for generating PDFs using
the fpdf2 library and updates the email templates to use markdown
formatting for better readability.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit ccecff77a5. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR introduces PDF generation functionality, improves email
formatting, sanitizes filenames, updates various files and dependencies,
and updates `docker-compose.dev.yml`.
**Key points**:
- Added PDF generation functionality using the `fpdf2` library
- Improved email formatting
- Sanitized filenames using the `unidecode` library
- Updated `backend/modules/assistant/ito/ito.py` to generate PDFs and
sanitize filenames
- Added `pdf_generator.py` in `backend/modules/assistant/ito/utils/` for
PDF generation
- Updated `Pipfile` and `Pipfile.lock` in
`backend/modules/assistant/ito/utils/` to include `unidecode`
- Updated `requirements.txt` with new dependencies
- Updated `docker-compose.dev.yml`
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request improves the prompt summary in the assistant code. It
updates the map_template and reduce_template to provide clearer
instructions for identifying main themes, key points, and important
information in each section of a document. The reduce_template also
specifies that the final summary should include the main themes, key
points, and important information of the entire document.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit 456736a41d. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR enhances the document summarization process in the
`SummaryAssistant` class by providing clearer instructions for
identifying main themes, key points, and important information in each
section of a document.
**Key points**:
- Updated `map_template` and `reduce_template` in `process_assistant`
function of `SummaryAssistant` class.
- Changes provide clearer instructions for summarizing documents.
- Final summary should include main themes, key points, and important
information of the entire document.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request adds functionality to update user usage and calculate
pricing in the ITO assistant. It includes a new method
`increase_usage_user()` that raises an error if the user has consumed
all of their credits, and a new method `calculate_pricing()` that
returns a fixed pricing value of 20.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit ee5fdf70f6. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR adds functionality to update user usage and calculate pricing in
the ITO assistant, with new methods in the `ITO` class and an update to
where the `increase_usage_user()` method is called.
**Key points**:
- Added `increase_usage_user()` and `calculate_pricing()` methods to
`ITO` class in `/backend/modules/assistant/ito/ito.py`
- `increase_usage_user()` updates user usage and raises an error if all
credits are consumed
- `calculate_pricing()` returns a fixed pricing value of 20
- `increase_usage_user()` is now called in the `ITO` class constructor
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
This pull request adds new input models for boolean, number, select
text, and select number. These models will allow for more flexible and
dynamic input options in the software. The changes include the addition
of the `InputBoolean`, `InputNumber`, `InputSelectText`, and
`InputSelectNumber` classes to the `Inputs` model. These classes provide
properties for key, required, description, and additional options
specific to each input type. This enhancement will improve the overall
functionality and user experience of the software.
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit 6fa583b6a8. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR enhances the `Inputs` model by adding new input models for
boolean, number, select text, and select number, improving the
software's functionality and user experience.
**Key points**:
- Added `InputBoolean`, `InputNumber`, `InputSelectText`, and
`InputSelectNumber` classes to `Inputs` model in `inputs.py` and
`outputs.py`.
- Each new class provides properties for key, required, description, and
additional options specific to each input type.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
----
| <a href="https://ellipsis.dev" target="_blank"><img
src="https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/80834858?s=400&u=31e596315b0d8f7465b3ee670f25cea677299c96&v=4"
alt="Ellipsis" width="30px" height="30px"/></a> | 🚀 This PR
description was created by [Ellipsis](https://www.ellipsis.dev) for
commit 5350e0a071. |
|--------|--------|
### Summary:
This PR adds a new script for evaluating the RAG model using the Ragas
library, with results saved as a JSON file and printed to the console.
**Key points**:
- New script `run_evaluation.py` added to
`backend/tests/ragas_evaluation/`.
- The script processes documents, generates replies using a QuivrRAG
chain, and evaluates the replies using specified metrics.
- Results are saved as a JSON file and printed to the console.
- The script can be run from the command line with various options.
----
Generated with ❤️ by [ellipsis.dev](https://www.ellipsis.dev)
<!--
ELLIPSIS_HIDDEN
-->
---------
Co-authored-by: Damien Mourot <damien.mourot@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: ellipsis-dev[bot] <65095814+ellipsis-dev[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request adds an icon and description to the assistant. The
icon is displayed in the user interface and the description provides
additional information about the assistant.
This pull request adds a new optional field "tags" to the
AssistantOutput classes. The "tags" field allows for categorizing the
outputs and can be used for filtering or organizing purposes.
…dio_transcript and crawler assistants
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
---------
Co-authored-by: Stan Girard <girard.stanislas@gmail.com>
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
