Updates the GPT-4 documentation and the `GPT4Brain` class to include
detailed information about the tools available for GPT4Brain and their
use cases.
- **Documentation (`docs/brains/gpt4.mdx`):**
- Adds a new section titled "Tools Available for GPT4Brain" that
describes specific tools: WebSearchTool, ImageGeneratorTool,
URLReaderTool, and EmailSenderTool.
- Provides use cases for each tool, demonstrating how they can be
utilized within GPT4Brain for various scenarios, such as generating
images, reading content from URLs, and sending emails.
- **Code (`backend/modules/brain/integrations/GPT4/Brain.py`):**
- Updates the class documentation to include information about the tools
available for GPT4Brain and outlines use cases for WebSearchTool,
ImageGeneratorTool, URLReaderTool, and EmailSenderTool.
- Maintains the existing functionality of the `GPT4Brain` class,
ensuring compatibility with the newly documented tools and use cases.
---
For more details, open the [Copilot Workspace
session](https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/QuivrHQ/quivr?shareId=2c2c1666-e5fb-4a06-bb08-ca967f4fe276).
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
Updates the `docs/brains/gpt4.mdx` documentation to include detailed
instructions on adding a GPT-4 Brain to Quivr and configuring it within
the Supabase integration table.
- Adds a new section titled "Adding GPT-4 Brain to Quivr" that outlines
the steps required to integrate a GPT-4 Brain into Quivr, including
accessing the Supabase dashboard and navigating to the integration
table.
- Provides step-by-step instructions for adding a custom brain named
gpt4 in the Supabase integration table and configuring the necessary
settings for the GPT-4 Brain, such as API keys and preferences.
---
For more details, open the [Copilot Workspace
session](https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/QuivrHQ/quivr?shareId=81c5fd43-eb46-407c-a40f-c0b0b3a41925).
This pull request introduces comprehensive documentation for configuring
Supabase in Quivr, including details on CLI usage, running migrations,
resetting the database, and deploying to a hosted version of Supabase.
- **Documentation Addition**: Adds a new document
`docs/configuring/supabase-setup.mdx` that provides a step-by-step guide
on setting up Supabase for Quivr. This includes initializing Supabase,
configuring environment variables, using the Supabase CLI for migrations
and database resets, and deploying to a hosted Supabase environment.
- **Documentation Navigation Update**: Updates `docs/mint.json` to
include a reference to the newly added `supabase-setup.mdx` in the
configuring section, ensuring users can easily find this resource.
---
For more details, open the [Copilot Workspace
session](https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/QuivrHQ/quivr?shareId=cadcc1b3-ff9d-4650-b92a-28cadcc3ebdf).
This pull request fixes the value of NEXT_PUBLIC_AUTH_MODES in the
docker-compose.yml file. The previous value was incorrect and has been
updated to the correct value.
This pull request adds the `NEXT_PUBLIC_AUTH_MODES` variable to the
`.env.example` file. This variable allows the application to specify the
authentication modes that are supported.
This pull request adds a new feature to generate images using the OpenAI
DALL-E model. The `ImageGeneratorTool` class is implemented to handle
the image generation functionality.
This pull request adds a GitHub Actions workflow for building and
pushing Docker images to Amazon ECR. The workflow is triggered on every
push to the main branch and includes steps for configuring AWS
credentials, logging in to Amazon ECR, GitHub Container Registry, and
Docker Hub, setting up Docker Buildx, creating a Docker cache storage
backend, and building, tagging, and pushing the Docker image to Amazon
ECR.
This pull request adds the Playwright library for web crawling. It
includes the necessary dependencies and updates the code to use
Playwright for crawling websites.
# Description
Delete the replacement of non ASCII characters into spaces
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [x] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [x] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [x] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
This pull request updates the PR title linting workflow to use the
action-semantic-pull-request@v5 action instead of the
conventional-pr-title-action. This change improves the accuracy of the
PR title validation process.
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
This pull request adds a new config parameter to the
`conversational_qa_chain` function. The config parameter allows for
passing metadata, specifically the conversation ID, to the function.
This change ensures that the conversation ID is included in the metadata
when invoking the `conversational_qa_chain` function.
Hello 👋 from Porter! Please merge this PR to finish setting up your
application.
Co-authored-by: porter-deployment-app[bot] <87230664+porter-deployment-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
Hello 👋 from Porter! Please merge this PR to finish setting up your
application.
Co-authored-by: porter-deployment-app[bot] <87230664+porter-deployment-app[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
This pull request adds the ProxyBrain integration to the project. The
ProxyBrain class is responsible for handling conversational QA and
generating answers based on the provided chat history and question.
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
---------
Co-authored-by: Stan Girard <girard.stanislas@gmail.com>
This pull request fixes the parsing instruction in the common.py file.
The result_type has been corrected to "markdown" and the
parsing_instruction has been updated to handle checkboxes, tables, and
other elements that are hard to parse in a meaningful way.
# Description
Please include a summary of the changes and the related issue. Please
also include relevant motivation and context.
## Checklist before requesting a review
Please delete options that are not relevant.
- [ ] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
- [ ] I have performed a self-review of my code
- [ ] I have commented hard-to-understand areas
- [ ] I have ideally added tests that prove my fix is effective or that
my feature works
- [ ] New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
- [ ] Any dependent changes have been merged
## Screenshots (if appropriate):
