@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ So for any ML-family language designed before Scala, it is safe to assume that i
4141
4242 2. Based on experience reports from Scala users, it seemed like the convenience was not worth the hidden cost. Yes, you can convert `n` in `(n + 1.5)` and everything is nice, but when you are in larger programs that are sparsely annotated, it can be quite difficult to figure out what is going on.
4343
44−This user data may be confounded by the fact that Scala allows quite extensive conversions, not just from `Int` to `Float`, but I think it is worth taking seriously nonetheless. So it is _possible_, but it is has tradeoffs.
44+This user data may be confounded by the fact that Scala allows quite extensive conversions, not just from `Int` to `Float`, but I think it is worth taking seriously nonetheless. So it is _possible_, but it has tradeoffs.
4545
4646
4747## Conclusion