@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ So for any ML-family language designed before Scala, it is safe to assume that i
42 2. Based on experience reports from Scala users, it seemed like the convenience was not worth the hidden cost. Yes, you can convert `n` in `(n + 1.5)` and everything is nice, but when you are in larger programs that are sparsely annotated, it can be quite difficult to figure out what is going on.
42 2. Based on experience reports from Scala users, it seemed like the convenience was not worth the hidden cost. Yes, you can convert `n` in `(n + 1.5)` and everything is nice, but when you are in larger programs that are sparsely annotated, it can be quite difficult to figure out what is going on.
44−This user data may be confounded by the fact that Scala allows quite extensive conversions, not just from `Int` to `Float`, but I think it is worth taking seriously nonetheless. So it is _possible_, but it is has tradeoffs.
44+This user data may be confounded by the fact that Scala allows quite extensive conversions, not just from `Int` to `Float`, but I think it is worth taking seriously nonetheless. So it is _possible_, but it has tradeoffs.
47## Conclusion
47## Conclusion