15 KiB
layout | title | category | tags | order | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
developer-doc | Release Policy | distribution |
|
3 |
Release Policy
As an open-source project and programming language, it is incredibly important that we have a well-defined release policy. This document defines said policy.
Once a release has been made it is immutable. The release should only ever be edited to mark it as broken. Nothing else should ever be changed.
No two release workflows can be running at once, to avoid race conditions since releases must update files in S3. Make sure that tags which trigger release builds are pushed sequentially, only pushing the next one after the previous build has finished.
- Versioning
- Release Branches
- Release Workflow
- Version Support
- Working on the Current Release
- Backporting Fixes
Versioning
Releases of Enso are versioned using semantic versioning.
Where a.b.c-tag
is the version string, a
is the major version, b
, is the
minor version, c
is the patch version, and tag
is additional metadata, the
following hold:
- Breaking changes to language behaviour or the public API will result in a major version increase.
- Addition of functionality in a backwards-compatible manner will result in a minor version increase.
- Backwards-compatible bug fixes will result in a patch version increase.
- The tag will indicate pre-release or beta versions, and will increase when any pre-release change is made. These are not intended to be stable.
Launcher Versioning
The launcher is released alongside Enso releases, so the launcher version is tied to the Enso version that it is released with.
Release Branches
A release branch in the Enso repository is a branch prefixed with release/
.
Release branches obey the following rules:
- One release branch exists per major version, and is named
release/n.x
, wheren
is the major version, and the rest is literal. - A release branch must contain tags corresponding to released versions of Enso. Once a release has been made, no further changes may be made to that release.
- A tagged release must contain a
RELEASES.md
file that describes the changes contained in that release.
It should be noted that general development still takes place on the main
branch of the repository.
Release Workflow
Cutting a release for Enso proceeds as follows:
- If no release branch exists for the current major version, one should be created.
- Release notes should be made up to date in
RELEASES.md
and committed to the release branch. - Ensure that the project version is set to the version that you want to release.
- A commit representing the release should be tagged on the release branch,
and the tag pushed to GitHub. The tag should have a description that
consists of the release notes for that tag, replacing hashes with
=
. - CI will create a draft release for this tag, as well as build and upload the appropriate artefacts. Do not create a release for your tag manually.
- The release notes for the version being released should be copied into the release body on GitHub.
- The release must be verified by two members of the engine team, and the QA team.
- Once approval has been gained from these members, the release may be made official.
- Push a commit to
main
bumping the version number and ensuring that it remains aSNAPSHOT
version.
Tag Naming
Tags for releases are named as follows enso-version
, where version
is the
semver string (see versioning) representing the version being
released.
Manifest Files
Manifest files are used to describe metadata about various releases for use by the Enso tooling.
Engine Manifest
Each GitHub release contains an asset named manifest.yaml
which is a YAML file
containing metadata regarding the release. The manifest is also included in the
root of an Enso version package. It has at least the following fields:
minimum-launcher-version
- specifies the minimum version of the launcher that should be used with this release of Enso,minimum-project-manager-version
- specifies the minimum version of the project manager that should be used with this release of Enso; currently it is the same as the launcher version but this may change in the future,graal-vm-version
- specifies the exact version of GraalVM that should be used with this release of Enso,graal-java-version
- as GraalVM versions may have different variants for different Java versions, this specifies which variant to use.
The minimum launcher and project manager versions are kept as separate fields, because at some point the same runtime version management logic may be associated with different versions of these components.
It can also contain the following additional fields:
jvm-options
- specifies a list of options that should be passed to the JVM running the engine. These options can be used to fine-tune version specific optimization settings etc. Each option must have a key calledvalue
which specifies what option should be passed. That value can include a variable$enginePackagePath
which is substituted with the absolute path to the root of the engine package that is being launched. Optionally, the option may defineos
which will restrict this option only to the provided operating system. Possibleos
values arelinux
,macos
andwindows
.broken
- can be set totrue
to mark this release as broken. This field is never set in a release. Instead, when the launcher is installing a release marked as broken using thebroken
file, it adds this property to the manifest to preserve that information.
For example:
minimum-launcher-version: 0.0.1
minimum-project-manager-version: 0.0.1
jvm-options:
- value: "-Dpolyglot.engine.IterativePartialEscape=true"
- value: "-Dtruffle.class.path.append=$enginePackagePath\\component\\runtime.jar"
os: "windows"
- value: "-Dtruffle.class.path.append=$enginePackagePath/component/runtime.jar"
os: "linux"
- value: "-Dtruffle.class.path.append=$enginePackagePath/component/runtime.jar"
os: "macos"
graal-vm-version: 20.2.0
graal-java-version: 11
The minimum-launcher-version
should be updated whenever a new version of Enso
introduces changes that require a more recent launcher version. This value is
stored in
distribution/manifest.template.yaml
and other values are added to this template at build time.
Launcher Manifest
Additionally, each release should contain an asset named
launcher-manifest.yaml
which contains launcher-specific release metadata.
It contains the following fields:
minimum-version-for-upgrade
- specifies the minimum version of the launcher that is allowed to upgrade to this launcher version. If a launcher is older than the version specified here it must perform the upgrade in steps, first upgrading to an older version newer thanminimum-version-for-upgrade
and only then, using that version, to the target version. This logic ensures that if a newer launcher version required custom upgrade logic not present in older versions, the upgrade can still be performed by first upgrading to a newer version that does not require the new logic but knows about it and continuing the upgrade with that knowledge.files-to-copy
- a list of files that should be copied into the distribution's data root. This may include theREADME
and similar files, so that after the upgrade these additional files are also up-to-date. These files are treated as non-essential, i.e. an error when copying them will not cancel the upgrade (but it should be reported).directories-to-copy
- a list of directories that should be copied into the distribution's data root. Acts similarly tofiles-to-copy
.
A template manifest file, located in
distribution/launcher-manifest.yaml
,
is automatically copied to the release. If any new files or directories are
added or a breaking change to the upgrade mechanism is being made, this manifest
template must be updated accordingly.
Breaking Changes to Launcher Upgrade
If at any point the launcher's upgrade mechanism needs an update, i.e. additional logic must be added that was not present before, special action is required.
First, the additional logic has to be implemented and a new launcher version
should be released which includes this additional logic, but does not require it
yet. Then, another version can be released that can depend on this new logic and
its minimum-version-for-upgrade
has to be bumped to that previous version
which already includes new logic but does not depend on it.
This way, old launcher versions can first upgrade to a version that contains the new logic (as it does not depend on it yet, the upgrade is possible) and using that new version, upgrade to the target version that depends on that logic.
GitHub Releases
A release is considered official once it has been made into a release on GitHub. Once official, a release may not be changed in any way, except to mark it as broken.
Release Assets Structure
Each release contains a build of the Enso engine and native launcher binaries for each supported platform. Moreover, for convenience, it should include bundles containing native launcher binaries and the latest engine build for each platform. So each release should contain the following assets:
enso-bundle-<version>-linux-amd64.tar.gz
enso-bundle-<version>-macos-amd64.tar.gz
enso-bundle-<version>-windows-amd64.zip
enso-engine-<version>-linux-amd64.tar.gz
enso-engine-<version>-macos-amd64.tar.gz
enso-engine-<version>-windows-amd64.zip
enso-launcher-<version>-linux-amd64.tar.gz
enso-launcher-<version>-macos-amd64.tar.gz
enso-launcher-<version>-windows-amd64.zip
manifest.yaml
Marking a Release as Broken
We intend to never delete a release from GitHub, as users may have projects that depend on specific versions of Enso. Instead, we provide a mechanism for marking releases as broken that works as follows:
- An empty file named
broken
is uploaded to the release. - The release description is edited to visibly mark the release as broken.
A broken release is one that must not be downloaded by the launcher unless a project specifies an exact version match, and it must not be used in new projects by the launcher unless explicitly specified by the user as an exact version match.
When the release is marked as broken at GitHub, a GitHub Actions
Workflow
is triggered that also updates the release in the fallback mechanism. Given its
current implementation is prone to race conditions when updating releases, the
broken
file should be added to releases one by one, making sure that only one
update workflow is running at the same time and that no release workflows are
running in parallel with it.
In an unusual situation in which you want to upload a release that is marked as broken from the start, you should first publish it in a non-broken state and only mark it as broken after publishing. That is because the GitHub Workflow that will persist the broken mark to S3 is not triggered for release drafts.
When marking the release as broken, you should make sure that the workflow persisting the broken mark to Se has succeeded and re-run it if necessary.
Release Notes
Release notes should contain a summary of the changes made between the last
release and the current release. They should follow the template given below,
and are contained in the RELEASES.md
file in the repository root.
# Enso x.y.z (YYYY-MM-DD)
## Language
- A list of language-level changes.
## Interpreter/Runtime
- A list of changes to the Enso interpreter.
## Type System
- A list of type-system changes.
## Tooling
- A list of changes to the Enso language tooling.
## Libraries
- A list of changes to the Enso core libraries.
## Stabilised Features
- A list of stabilised APIs and/or features.
## Misc
- A list of miscellaneous changes.
## Internal Only
- A list of changes that do not have user-facing impact, but represent
significant improvements to the internals of Enso and related tools.
If there are no changes for a section, the section may be removed.
The releases file is an ongoing record of changes, and may diverge between
main
and the various release branches.
Version Support
We aim to support a given major version for some period of time after the release of the next major version. For a detailed breakdown of the major versions that are currently supported, please see the security document.
Working on the Current Release
When working on the current release, development should take place against the
main
branch. When it is time to cut a release, the new commits on the main
branch are cherry-picked onto the current release branch. From there, the
release proceeds as described in release workflow above.
Backporting Fixes
Supporting a major version for some time after the release of the next major
version will sometimes require backporting a fix to the previous major version
from the current version or from main
.
Backporting should only be used for applying fixes, not the addition of new features.
The process for performing such a backport is as follows:
- Create a new branch called
backport/version/fix-name
, whereversion
matches the version string of the corresponding release branch. This branch should branch off the corresponding release branch. - Back-port the fix to the newly created
backport
branch. This can be done by:- Cherry-picking the commit and performing fixups (preferred).
- Re-implementing the fix manually (if cherry-picking will not work due to progression of the codebase).
- Submit your
backport/version/fix-name
branch for review as a pull-request into therelease/version
branch. - Once the PR has passed CI and been approved by the appropriate reviewers, it can be merged into the release branch.