Add a -B option to remove a bookmark. All revisions are unreachable
from a different head or a different bookmark will be removed too.
This helps with topic branch workflow. You can create a topic branch
and remove it if not needed anymore with hg strip -B topic/xyz.
Destroying history via strip used to invalidate the branchheads cache,
causing it to be regenerated the next time it is read. This is
expensive in large repos. This change converts strip to pass info to
localrepo.destroyed() to enable to it to incrementally update the
cache, improving the performance of strip and other operations that
depend on it (e.g., rebase).
This change also strengthens a bit the integrity checking of the
branchheads cache when it is read, by rejecting the cache if it has
nodes in it that no longer exist.
Bookmarks will behave more like named branches when merge tries to pick
a revision to merge.
Bookmarks now to respect the current bookmarks. Bookmarks will not
accidentally merged with unnamed heads or other bookmarks. However merge
can pick heads with diverging bookmarks and pick those automatically.
We end up with two cases for picking a revision to merge:
(1) In case of an current bookmark, merge can pick a branch head that has a
diverged bookmark
(2) In case of no current bookmark, merge can pick a branch head that does not
have a bookmark.
Similar to branch heads we introduce the notion of bookmarkheads.
Bookmarkheads are changests that are bookmarked with the given bookmark
or a diverged version
Previously, when updating, cachelfiles was called blindly on all largefiles
in the repository at the revision being updated to, despite the fact that
a list of which largefiles needs to be updated has already been collected. This
optimization constrains the cachelfiles call to only the largefiles that need
to be updated.
On a repository with about 80 largefiles, updating between two revisions that
only change one largefile goes from approximately 6.7 seconds to 3.3 seconds.
brendan mentioned on IRC that b64decode raises a TypeError too, but while the
previous exception type may be better in general, it is much easier to make it
behave like the related C code and changes nothing for mercurial itself.
When we encounter a corrupt index, we "fail" the init but our
destructor still gets called. On some systems, this was causing us to
attempt to decref a dangling to self->data.
Note that aborting in subrepo.state() prevents "repairing" commands like revert
to be issued. The user will have to edit the .hgsubstate manually (but he
probably had already otherwise this would not be failing). The same behaviour
already happens with invalid .hgsub entries.
Let R be a repo served by an hg daemon on a machine with an empty largefiles
cache. Pushing a largefiles repo to R will result in a no-such-file-or-directory
OSError because putlfile will attempt to create a temporary file in
R/.hg/largefiles, which does not yet exist.
This patch also adds a regression test for this scenario.
We allow rebase plus collapse, but not collapse only? I imagine people would
rebase first then collapse once they are sure the rebase is correct and it is
the right time to finish it.
I was reluctant to submit this patch for reasons detailed below, but it
improves rebase --collapse usefulness so much it is worth the ugliness.
The fix is ugly because we should be fixing the collapse code path rather than
the merge. Collapsing by merging changesets repeatedly is inefficient compared
to what commit --amend does: commitctx(), update, strip. The problem with the
latter is, to generate the synthetic changeset, copy records are gathered with
copies.pathcopies(). copies.pathcopies() is still implemented with merging in
mind and discards information like file replaced by the copy of another,
criss-cross copies and so forth. I believe this information should not be lost,
even if we decide not to interpret it fully later, at merge time.
The second issue with improving rebase --collapse is the option should not be
there to begin with. Rebasing and collapsing are orthogonal and a dedicated
command would probably enable a better, simpler ui. We should avoid advertizing
rebase --collapse, but with this fix it becomes the best shipped solution to
collapse changesets.
And for the record, available techniques are:
- revert + commit + strip: lose copies
- mq/qfold: repeated patching() (mostly correct, fragile)
- rebase: repeated merges (mostly correct, fragile)
- collapse: revert + tag rewriting wizardry, lose copies
- histedit: repeated patching() (mostly correct, fragile)
- amend: copies.pathcopies() + commitctx() + update + strip
Eliminates
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(143) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(144) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
when compiling for Windows x64 target using the Microsoft compiler.
Eliminates
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(81) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(82) : warning C4244: '=' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
when compiling for Windows x64 target using the Microsoft compiler.
Eliminates
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(23) : warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(26) : warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(27) : warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
mercurial/diffhelpers.c(30) : warning C4244: 'initializing' : conversion from
'Py_ssize_t' to 'int', possible loss of data
when compiling for Windows x64 target using the Microsoft compiler.
The radix tree already contains all the information we need to
determine whether a short string is an unambiguous node identifier.
We now make use of this information.
In a kernel tree, this improves the performance of
"hg log -q -r24bf01de75" from 0.27 seconds to 0.06.
