1
1
mirror of https://github.com/github/semantic.git synced 2024-12-18 12:21:57 +03:00
semantic/weekly/2016-08-15.md
2016-08-15 11:27:23 -04:00

28 lines
1.8 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains invisible Unicode characters

This file contains invisible Unicode characters that are indistinguishable to humans but may be processed differently by a computer. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

# August 15th, 2016 weekly
## What went well?
@rewinfrey: Test generation branch got merged in. Completion of the syntax for JS! Progress on diff summaries <3
@joshvera: Deploying `semantic-diff` went pretty well. Added a bunch of issues for the remaining tasks. Its a manageable chunk of work for this week.
@robrix: The _p_,_q_-gram precomputation branch got merged. Also resolved RWS bias, and got a chance to bounce that off @jbarnette
## What went …less well?
@rewinfrey: We arent producing replacement patches, which is a bit of a question mark.
@joshvera: Some `nil`s in Ruby causing some exceptions (tho they were easy to resolve). Almost botched a deploy, that couldve gone better.
@robrix: Running into #683 at the last mile of the precomputing _p_,_q_-grams branch was frankly a bit of a shock.
## What did we learn?
@rewinfrey: Learned a lot about ambiguity & contradiction in Haskells typechecking & type inference. Very cool seeing how unification is able to resolve types at the very last. Did some pairing coercing a monadic value into a monadic wrapper.
@joshvera: Composing effects in `freer`. Also that we rotate into platform support on Sunday, as I did, so Ill be doing that this week.
@robrix: Discovered #683! Also learned that the RWS-Diff papers implementation suffers this problem, but they didnt notice (or at least didnt note it), probably due to some ameliorating factors (they match up equalities in an earlier pass which we lack, meaning that the most obvious effects of this wouldnt be felt). This was also a good reminder that some of our correct behaviour is only incidentally captured in our tests (if at all), partly because its often difficult extracting a precise property to test given an intuitive grasp of what a correct diff should look like. **Edit:** Bonus round: `.jbarnette me` exists!