graphql-engine/server/src-lib/Hasura/Backends/MSSQL/Instances/Execute.hs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

464 lines
16 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

{-# OPTIONS_GHC -fno-warn-orphans #-}
-- | MSSQL Instances Execute
--
-- Defines a 'BackendExecute' type class instance for MSSQL.
--
-- This module implements the needed functionality for implementing a 'BackendExecute'
-- instance for MSSQL, which defines an interface for translating a root field into an execution plan
-- and interacting with a database.
--
-- This module includes the MSSQL implementation of queries, mutations, and more.
module Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Instances.Execute
( MultiplexedQuery' (..),
multiplexRootReselect,
)
where
server/mssql: add cascade to mssql_run_sql <!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ --> ## Description <!-- Please fill thier. --> <!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective --> We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata. This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by -> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown -> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any -> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check ### Related Issues <!-- Please make surt title --> <!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) --> Close #1853 ### Solution and Design <!-- How is this iss --> <!-- It's better if we elaborate --> The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend. ### Steps to test and verify <!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? --> - Create author - article tables and track them - Defined object and array relationships - Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false` - The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception ## Changelog - ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label. ## Affected components <!-- Remove non-affected components from the list --> - ✅ Server - ❎ Console - ❎ CLI - ❎ Docs - ❎ Community Content - ❎ Build System - ✅ Tests - ❎ Other (list it) PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636 GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
2021-10-22 17:49:15 +03:00
import Control.Monad.Trans.Control (MonadBaseControl)
import Data.Aeson.Extended qualified as J
import Data.Environment qualified as Env
import Data.HashMap.Strict qualified as Map
import Data.HashMap.Strict.InsOrd qualified as OMap
import Data.HashSet qualified as Set
import Data.List.NonEmpty qualified as NE
import Data.Text.Extended qualified as T
import Database.MSSQL.Transaction qualified as Tx
import Database.ODBC.SQLServer qualified as ODBC
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Connection
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Execute.Delete
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Execute.Insert
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Execute.QueryTags
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Execute.Update
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.FromIr.Constants (jsonFieldName)
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Plan
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.SQL.Error
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.SQL.Value (txtEncodedColVal)
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.ToQuery as TQ
import Hasura.Backends.MSSQL.Types.Internal as TSQL
import Hasura.Base.Error
import Hasura.EncJSON
import Hasura.GraphQL.Execute.Backend
import Hasura.GraphQL.Execute.Subscription.Plan
import Hasura.GraphQL.Namespace (RootFieldAlias (..), RootFieldMap)
import Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Options qualified as Options
import Hasura.Prelude
import Hasura.QueryTags (QueryTagsComment)
server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497) Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST. This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible). The approach now changes to this: 1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed. 1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary. 1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response. ### Known issues 1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR. 1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR. 1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins. 1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST. 1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code. ### Notes to the reviewers I think it is best reviewed commit by commit. 1. The first one is very straight forward. 1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore 1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor 1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497 GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 06:26:50 +03:00
import Hasura.RQL.IR
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Backend as RQLTypes
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Column qualified as RQLColumn
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Common as RQLTypes
import Hasura.SQL.AnyBackend qualified as AB
import Hasura.SQL.Backend
import Hasura.Session
import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax qualified as G
import Network.HTTP.Types qualified as HTTP
instance BackendExecute 'MSSQL where
type PreparedQuery 'MSSQL = Text
type MultiplexedQuery 'MSSQL = MultiplexedQuery'
type ExecutionMonad 'MSSQL = ExceptT QErr IO
mkDBQueryPlan = msDBQueryPlan
mkDBMutationPlan = msDBMutationPlan
mkLiveQuerySubscriptionPlan = msDBLiveQuerySubscriptionPlan
mkDBStreamingSubscriptionPlan _ _ _ _ _ _ = throw500 "Streaming subscriptions are not supported for MS-SQL sources yet"
mkDBQueryExplain = msDBQueryExplain
mkSubscriptionExplain = msDBSubscriptionExplain
mkDBRemoteRelationshipPlan =
msDBRemoteRelationshipPlan
-- * Multiplexed query
data MultiplexedQuery' = MultiplexedQuery'
{ reselect :: Reselect,
subscriptionQueryTagsComment :: QueryTagsComment
}
instance T.ToTxt MultiplexedQuery' where
toTxt (MultiplexedQuery' reselect queryTags) =
T.toTxt $ toQueryPretty (fromReselect reselect) `withQueryTags` queryTags
-- * Query
msDBQueryPlan ::
forall m.
( MonadError QErr m,
MonadReader QueryTagsComment m
) =>
server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497) Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST. This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible). The approach now changes to this: 1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed. 1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary. 1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response. ### Known issues 1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR. 1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR. 1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins. 1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST. 1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code. ### Notes to the reviewers I think it is best reviewed commit by commit. 1. The first one is very straight forward. 1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore 1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor 1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497 GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 06:26:50 +03:00
UserInfo ->
Env.Environment ->
SourceName ->
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
QueryDB 'MSSQL Void (UnpreparedValue 'MSSQL) ->
[HTTP.Header] ->
Maybe G.Name ->
server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497) Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST. This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible). The approach now changes to this: 1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed. 1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary. 1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response. ### Known issues 1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR. 1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR. 1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins. 1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST. 1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code. ### Notes to the reviewers I think it is best reviewed commit by commit. 1. The first one is very straight forward. 1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore 1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor 1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497 GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 06:26:50 +03:00
m (DBStepInfo 'MSSQL)
msDBQueryPlan userInfo _env sourceName sourceConfig qrf _ _ = do
let sessionVariables = _uiSession userInfo
statement <- planQuery sessionVariables qrf
queryTags <- ask
-- Append Query tags comment to the select statement
let printer = fromSelect statement `withQueryTagsPrinter` queryTags
queryString = ODBC.renderQuery (toQueryPretty printer)
pure $ DBStepInfo @'MSSQL sourceName sourceConfig (Just queryString) (runSelectQuery printer) ()
where
runSelectQuery :: Printer -> ExceptT QErr IO EncJSON
runSelectQuery queryPrinter = do
let queryTx = encJFromText <$> Tx.singleRowQueryE defaultMSSQLTxErrorHandler (toQueryFlat queryPrinter)
mssqlRunReadOnly (_mscExecCtx sourceConfig) queryTx
runShowplan ::
MonadIO m =>
ODBC.Query ->
Tx.TxET QErr m [Text]
runShowplan query = Tx.withTxET defaultMSSQLTxErrorHandler do
Tx.unitQuery "SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT ON"
texts <- Tx.multiRowQuery query
Tx.unitQuery "SET SHOWPLAN_TEXT OFF"
-- we don't need to use 'finally' here - if an exception occurs,
-- the connection is removed from the resource pool in 'withResource'.
pure texts
msDBQueryExplain ::
MonadError QErr m =>
RootFieldAlias ->
UserInfo ->
SourceName ->
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
QueryDB 'MSSQL Void (UnpreparedValue 'MSSQL) ->
[HTTP.Header] ->
Maybe G.Name ->
m (AB.AnyBackend DBStepInfo)
msDBQueryExplain fieldName userInfo sourceName sourceConfig qrf _ _ = do
let sessionVariables = _uiSession userInfo
statement <- planQuery sessionVariables qrf
let query = toQueryPretty (fromSelect statement)
queryString = ODBC.renderQuery query
odbcQuery =
mssqlRunReadOnly
(_mscExecCtx sourceConfig)
do
showplan <- runShowplan query
pure
( encJFromJValue $
ExplainPlan
fieldName
(Just queryString)
(Just showplan)
)
pure $
AB.mkAnyBackend $
DBStepInfo @'MSSQL sourceName sourceConfig Nothing odbcQuery ()
msDBSubscriptionExplain ::
server/mssql: add cascade to mssql_run_sql <!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ --> ## Description <!-- Please fill thier. --> <!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective --> We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata. This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by -> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown -> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any -> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check ### Related Issues <!-- Please make surt title --> <!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) --> Close #1853 ### Solution and Design <!-- How is this iss --> <!-- It's better if we elaborate --> The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend. ### Steps to test and verify <!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? --> - Create author - article tables and track them - Defined object and array relationships - Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false` - The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception ## Changelog - ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label. ## Affected components <!-- Remove non-affected components from the list --> - ✅ Server - ❎ Console - ❎ CLI - ❎ Docs - ❎ Community Content - ❎ Build System - ✅ Tests - ❎ Other (list it) PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636 GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
2021-10-22 17:49:15 +03:00
(MonadIO m, MonadBaseControl IO m, MonadError QErr m) =>
SubscriptionQueryPlan 'MSSQL (MultiplexedQuery 'MSSQL) ->
m SubscriptionQueryPlanExplanation
msDBSubscriptionExplain (SubscriptionQueryPlan plan sourceConfig cohortId _dynamicConnection variables _) = do
let (MultiplexedQuery' reselect _queryTags) = _plqpQuery plan
query = toQueryPretty $ fromSelect $ multiplexRootReselect [(cohortId, variables)] reselect
mssqlExecCtx = (_mscExecCtx sourceConfig)
explainInfo <- liftEitherM $ runExceptT $ (mssqlRunReadOnly mssqlExecCtx) (runShowplan query)
pure $ SubscriptionQueryPlanExplanation (T.toTxt query) explainInfo variables
-- | Producing the correct SQL-level list comprehension to multiplex a query
-- Problem description:
--
-- Generate a query that repeats the same query N times but with
-- certain slots replaced:
--
-- [ Select x y | (x,y) <- [..] ]
--
-- Caution: Be aware that this query has a @FOR JSON@ clause at the top-level
-- and hence its results may be split up across multiple rows. Use
-- 'Database.MSSQL.Transaction.forJsonQueryE' to handle this.
multiplexRootReselect ::
[(CohortId, CohortVariables)] ->
TSQL.Reselect ->
TSQL.Select
multiplexRootReselect variables rootReselect =
emptySelect
{ selectTop = NoTop,
selectProjections =
[ FieldNameProjection
Aliased
{ aliasedThing =
TSQL.FieldName
{ fieldNameEntity = rowAlias,
fieldName = resultIdAlias
},
aliasedAlias = resultIdAlias
},
ExpressionProjection
Aliased
{ aliasedThing =
ColumnExpression
( TSQL.FieldName
{ fieldNameEntity = resultAlias,
fieldName = jsonFieldName
}
),
aliasedAlias = resultAlias
}
],
selectFrom =
Just $
FromOpenJson
Aliased
{ aliasedThing =
OpenJson
{ openJsonExpression =
ValueExpression (ODBC.TextValue $ lbsToTxt $ J.encode variables),
openJsonWith =
Just $
NE.fromList
[ ScalarField GuidType DataLengthUnspecified resultIdAlias (Just $ IndexPath RootPath 0),
JsonField resultVarsAlias (Just $ IndexPath RootPath 1)
]
},
aliasedAlias = rowAlias
},
selectJoins =
[ Join
{ joinSource = JoinReselect rootReselect,
joinJoinAlias =
JoinAlias
{ joinAliasEntity = resultAlias,
joinAliasField = Just jsonFieldName
}
}
],
selectWhere = Where mempty,
selectFor =
JsonFor ForJson {jsonCardinality = JsonArray, jsonRoot = NoRoot},
selectOrderBy = Nothing,
selectOffset = Nothing
}
-- * Mutation
msDBMutationPlan ::
forall m.
( MonadError QErr m,
MonadReader QueryTagsComment m
) =>
server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497) Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST. This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible). The approach now changes to this: 1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed. 1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary. 1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response. ### Known issues 1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR. 1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR. 1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins. 1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST. 1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code. ### Notes to the reviewers I think it is best reviewed commit by commit. 1. The first one is very straight forward. 1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore 1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor 1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497 GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 06:26:50 +03:00
UserInfo ->
Env.Environment ->
Options.StringifyNumbers ->
SourceName ->
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
MutationDB 'MSSQL Void (UnpreparedValue 'MSSQL) ->
[HTTP.Header] ->
Maybe G.Name ->
server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497) Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST. This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible). The approach now changes to this: 1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed. 1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary. 1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response. ### Known issues 1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR. 1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR. 1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins. 1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST. 1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code. ### Notes to the reviewers I think it is best reviewed commit by commit. 1. The first one is very straight forward. 1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore 1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor 1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497 GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 06:26:50 +03:00
m (DBStepInfo 'MSSQL)
msDBMutationPlan userInfo _environment stringifyNum sourceName sourceConfig mrf _headers _gName = do
go <$> case mrf of
MDBInsert annInsert -> executeInsert userInfo stringifyNum sourceConfig annInsert
MDBDelete annDelete -> executeDelete userInfo stringifyNum sourceConfig annDelete
MDBUpdate annUpdate -> executeUpdate userInfo stringifyNum sourceConfig annUpdate
MDBFunction {} -> throw400 NotSupported "function mutations are not supported in MSSQL"
where
go v = DBStepInfo @'MSSQL sourceName sourceConfig Nothing v ()
-- * Subscription
msDBLiveQuerySubscriptionPlan ::
forall m.
( MonadError QErr m,
server/mssql: add cascade to mssql_run_sql <!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ --> ## Description <!-- Please fill thier. --> <!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective --> We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata. This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by -> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown -> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any -> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check ### Related Issues <!-- Please make surt title --> <!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) --> Close #1853 ### Solution and Design <!-- How is this iss --> <!-- It's better if we elaborate --> The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend. ### Steps to test and verify <!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? --> - Create author - article tables and track them - Defined object and array relationships - Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false` - The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception ## Changelog - ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label. ## Affected components <!-- Remove non-affected components from the list --> - ✅ Server - ❎ Console - ❎ CLI - ❎ Docs - ❎ Community Content - ❎ Build System - ✅ Tests - ❎ Other (list it) PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636 GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
2021-10-22 17:49:15 +03:00
MonadIO m,
MonadBaseControl IO m,
MonadReader QueryTagsComment m
) =>
UserInfo ->
SourceName ->
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
Maybe G.Name ->
RootFieldMap (QueryDB 'MSSQL Void (UnpreparedValue 'MSSQL)) ->
[HTTP.Header] ->
Maybe G.Name ->
m (SubscriptionQueryPlan 'MSSQL (MultiplexedQuery 'MSSQL))
msDBLiveQuerySubscriptionPlan UserInfo {_uiSession, _uiRole} _sourceName sourceConfig namespace rootFields _ _ = do
(reselect, prepareState) <- planSubscription (OMap.mapKeys _rfaAlias rootFields) _uiSession
cohortVariables <- prepareStateCohortVariables sourceConfig _uiSession prepareState
queryTags <- ask
let parameterizedPlan = ParameterizedSubscriptionQueryPlan _uiRole $ (MultiplexedQuery' reselect queryTags)
pure $
SubscriptionQueryPlan parameterizedPlan sourceConfig dummyCohortId () cohortVariables namespace
prepareStateCohortVariables ::
(MonadError QErr m, MonadIO m, MonadBaseControl IO m) =>
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
SessionVariables ->
PrepareState ->
m CohortVariables
prepareStateCohortVariables sourceConfig session prepState = do
(namedVars, posVars) <- validateVariables sourceConfig session prepState
let PrepareState {sessionVariables} = prepState
pure $
mkCohortVariables
sessionVariables
session
namedVars
posVars
mempty -- streaming cursor variables are kept empty because streaming subscriptions aren't yet supported for MS-SQL
-- | Ensure that the set of variables (with value instantiations) that occur in
-- a (RQL) query produce a well-formed and executable (SQL) query when
-- considered in isolation.
--
-- This helps avoiding cascading failures in multiplexed queries.
--
-- c.f. https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/issues/1210.
validateVariables ::
server/mssql: add cascade to mssql_run_sql <!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ --> ## Description <!-- Please fill thier. --> <!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective --> We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata. This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by -> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown -> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any -> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check ### Related Issues <!-- Please make surt title --> <!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) --> Close #1853 ### Solution and Design <!-- How is this iss --> <!-- It's better if we elaborate --> The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend. ### Steps to test and verify <!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? --> - Create author - article tables and track them - Defined object and array relationships - Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false` - The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception ## Changelog - ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label. ## Affected components <!-- Remove non-affected components from the list --> - ✅ Server - ❎ Console - ❎ CLI - ❎ Docs - ❎ Community Content - ❎ Build System - ✅ Tests - ❎ Other (list it) PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636 GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
2021-10-22 17:49:15 +03:00
(MonadError QErr m, MonadIO m, MonadBaseControl IO m) =>
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
SessionVariables ->
PrepareState ->
m (ValidatedQueryVariables, ValidatedSyntheticVariables)
validateVariables sourceConfig sessionVariableValues prepState = do
let PrepareState {sessionVariables, namedArguments, positionalArguments} = prepState
-- We generate a single 'canary' query in the form:
--
-- SELECT ... [session].[x-hasura-foo] as [x-hasura-foo], ... as a, ... as b, ...
-- FROM OPENJSON('...')
-- WITH ([x-hasura-foo] NVARCHAR(MAX)) as [session]
--
-- where 'a', 'b', etc. are aliases given to positional arguments.
-- Named arguments and session variables are aliased to themselves.
--
-- The idea being that if the canary query succeeds we can be
-- reasonably confident that adding these variables to a query being
-- polled will not crash the poller.
occSessionVars =
filterSessionVariables
(\k _ -> Set.member k sessionVariables)
sessionVariableValues
expSes, expNamed, expPos :: [Aliased Expression]
expSes = sessionReference <$> getSessionVariables occSessionVars
expNamed =
map
( \(n, v) -> Aliased (ValueExpression (RQLColumn.cvValue v)) (G.unName n)
)
$ Map.toList
$ namedArguments
-- For positional args we need to be a bit careful not to capture names
-- from expNamed and expSes (however unlikely)
expPos =
zipWith
(\n v -> Aliased (ValueExpression (RQLColumn.cvValue v)) n)
(freshVars (expNamed <> expSes))
positionalArguments
projAll :: [Projection]
projAll = map ExpressionProjection (expSes <> expNamed <> expPos)
canaryQuery =
if null projAll
then Nothing
else
Just $
renderQuery
emptySelect
{ selectProjections = projAll,
selectFrom = sessionOpenJson occSessionVars
}
for_
canaryQuery
( \q -> do
_ :: [[ODBC.Value]] <- liftEitherM $ runExceptT $ mssqlRunReadOnly (_mscExecCtx sourceConfig) (Tx.multiRowQueryE defaultMSSQLTxErrorHandler q)
pure ()
)
pure
( ValidatedVariables $ txtEncodedColVal <$> namedArguments,
ValidatedVariables $ txtEncodedColVal <$> positionalArguments
)
where
renderQuery :: Select -> ODBC.Query
renderQuery = toQueryFlat . fromSelect
freshVars :: [Aliased a] -> [Text]
freshVars boundNames = filter (not . (`elem` map aliasedAlias boundNames)) chars
-- Infinite list of expression aliases.
chars :: [Text]
chars = [y T.<>> x | y <- [""] <|> chars, x <- ['a' .. 'z']]
sessionOpenJson :: SessionVariables -> Maybe From
sessionOpenJson occSessionVars =
nonEmpty (getSessionVariables occSessionVars)
<&> \fields ->
FromOpenJson $
Aliased
( OpenJson
(ValueExpression $ ODBC.TextValue $ lbsToTxt $ J.encode occSessionVars)
(pure (sessField <$> fields))
)
"session"
sessField :: Text -> JsonFieldSpec
sessField var = StringField var Nothing
sessionReference :: Text -> Aliased Expression
sessionReference var = Aliased (ColumnExpression (TSQL.FieldName var "session")) var
-- * Remote Relationships (e.g. DB-to-DB Joins, remote schema joins, etc.)
-- | Construct an action (i.e. 'DBStepInfo') which can marshal some remote
-- relationship information into a form that SQL Server can query against.
--
-- XXX: Currently unimplemented; the Postgres implementation uses
-- @jsonb_to_recordset@ to query the remote relationship, however this
-- functionality doesn't exist in SQL Server.
--
-- NOTE: The following typeclass constraints will be necessary when implementing
-- this function for real:
--
-- @
-- MonadQueryTags m
-- Backend 'MSSQL
-- @
msDBRemoteRelationshipPlan ::
forall m.
( MonadError QErr m
) =>
UserInfo ->
SourceName ->
SourceConfig 'MSSQL ->
-- | List of json objects, each of which becomes a row of the table.
NonEmpty J.Object ->
-- | The above objects have this schema
--
-- XXX: What is this for/what does this mean?
HashMap RQLTypes.FieldName (RQLTypes.Column 'MSSQL, RQLTypes.ScalarType 'MSSQL) ->
-- | This is a field name from the lhs that *has* to be selected in the
-- response along with the relationship.
RQLTypes.FieldName ->
(RQLTypes.FieldName, SourceRelationshipSelection 'MSSQL Void UnpreparedValue) ->
[HTTP.Header] ->
Maybe G.Name ->
Options.StringifyNumbers ->
m (DBStepInfo 'MSSQL)
msDBRemoteRelationshipPlan userInfo sourceName sourceConfig lhs lhsSchema argumentId relationship _headers _gName _stringifyNumbers = do
-- `stringifyNumbers` is not currently handled in any SQL Server operation
statement <- planSourceRelationship (_uiSession userInfo) lhs lhsSchema argumentId relationship
let printer = fromSelect statement
queryString = ODBC.renderQuery $ toQueryPretty printer
odbcQuery = runSelectQuery printer
pure $ DBStepInfo @'MSSQL sourceName sourceConfig (Just queryString) odbcQuery ()
where
runSelectQuery :: Printer -> ExceptT QErr IO EncJSON
runSelectQuery queryPrinter = do
let queryTx = encJFromText <$> Tx.singleRowQueryE defaultMSSQLTxErrorHandler (toQueryFlat queryPrinter)
mssqlRunReadOnly (_mscExecCtx sourceConfig) queryTx