graphql-engine/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/Schema/Cache/Dependencies.hs

Ignoring revisions in .git-blame-ignore-revs. Click here to bypass and see the normal blame view.

291 lines
14 KiB
Haskell
Raw Normal View History

module Hasura.RQL.DDL.Schema.Cache.Dependencies
( resolveDependencies,
)
where
import Control.Arrow.Extended
import Control.Lens hiding ((.=))
import Data.Aeson
import Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended qualified as M
import Data.HashMap.Strict.InsOrd qualified as OMap
import Data.HashSet qualified as HS
import Data.List (nub)
import Data.Monoid (First)
import Data.Text.Extended
import Hasura.Base.Error
import Hasura.Prelude
import Hasura.RQL.DDL.Permission.Internal (permissionIsDefined)
import Hasura.RQL.DDL.Schema.Cache.Common
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Action
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Backend
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Column
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Common
import Hasura.RQL.Types.ComputedField
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Endpoint
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Function
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Metadata.Object
import Hasura.RQL.Types.OpenTelemetry
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Permission
import Hasura.RQL.Types.QueryCollection
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Relationships.Local
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SchemaCache
import Hasura.RQL.Types.SchemaCacheTypes
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Source
import Hasura.RQL.Types.Table
scaffolding for remote-schemas module The main aim of the PR is: 1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package. 2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it. ## Notes to the reviewer Why a PR with large-ish diff? 1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section. 1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process. ## Changes in the PR ### Module structure Sets up the module structure as follows: ``` Hasura/ RemoteSchema/ Metadata/ Types.hs SchemaCache/ Types.hs Permission.hs RemoteRelationship.hs Build.hs MetadataAPI/ Types.hs Execute.hs ``` ### 1. Types representing metadata are moved Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`. - This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as `Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass. - The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship definition. ### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`. Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at. Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components. This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in. While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal. This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase. ### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively. ## Open questions: 1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/blob/ceba6d62264603ee5d279814677b29bcc43ecaea/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs#L55) and [2](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/blob/ceba6d62264603ee5d279814677b29bcc43ecaea/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs#L91), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s. Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further. 1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type: ```haskell buildRemoteSchemas :: ( ArrowChoice arr, Inc.ArrowDistribute arr, ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr, Inc.ArrowCache m arr, MonadIO m, HasHttpManagerM m, Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition, ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition, MonadError QErr m ) => Env.Environment -> ( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles), [RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition] ) `arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject) ``` Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as ```haskell data CollectedInfo = CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata | CIDependency MetadataObject -- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies SchemaObjId SchemaDependency deriving (Eq) ``` this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, .... How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine? 1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature: ```haskell buildSchemaCacheFor :: (QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) => MetadataObjId -> MetadataModifier -> ``` This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint): ```haskell runAddRemoteSchema :: ( QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MonadIO m, HasHttpManagerM m, MetadataM m, Tracing.MonadTrace m ) => Env.Environment -> AddRemoteSchemaQuery -> m EncJSON ``` This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed. ```haskell runAddRemoteSchema :: ( QErrM m, MonadIO m, HasHttpManagerM m, MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m, MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m, Tracing.MonadTrace m ) => Env.Environment -> AddRemoteSchemaQuery -> m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId ``` The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call `buildSchemaCacheFor`. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291 GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
2022-10-21 06:13:07 +03:00
import Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache (rscPermissions, rscRemoteRelationships)
import Hasura.SQL.AnyBackend qualified as AB
import Hasura.SQL.Backend
import Hasura.SQL.BackendMap qualified as BackendMap
import Language.GraphQL.Draft.Syntax qualified as G
-- | Processes collected 'CIDependency' values into a 'DepMap', performing integrity checking to
-- ensure the dependencies actually exist. If a dependency is missing, its transitive dependents are
-- removed from the cache, and 'InconsistentMetadata's are returned.
resolveDependencies ::
(ArrowKleisli m arr, QErrM m) =>
( BuildOutputs,
[(MetadataObject, SchemaObjId, SchemaDependency)]
)
`arr` (BuildOutputs, [InconsistentMetadata], DepMap)
resolveDependencies = arrM \(cache, dependencies) -> do
let dependencyMap =
dependencies
& M.groupOn (view _2)
& fmap (map \(metadataObject, _, schemaDependency) -> (metadataObject, schemaDependency))
performIteration 0 cache [] dependencyMap
-- Processes dependencies using an iterative process that alternates between two steps:
--
-- 1. First, pruneDanglingDependents searches for any dependencies that do not exist in the
-- current cache and removes their dependents from the dependency map, returning an
-- InconsistentMetadata for each dependent that was removed. This step does not change
-- the schema cache in any way.
--
-- 2. Second, deleteMetadataObject drops the pruned dependent objects from the cache. It does
-- not alter (or consult) the dependency map, so transitive dependents are /not/ removed.
--
-- By iterating the above process until pruneDanglingDependents does not discover any new
-- inconsistencies, all missing dependencies will eventually be removed, and since dependency
-- graphs between schema objects are unlikely to be very deep, it will usually terminate in just
-- a few iterations.
performIteration ::
(QErrM m) =>
Int ->
BuildOutputs ->
[InconsistentMetadata] ->
HashMap SchemaObjId [(MetadataObject, SchemaDependency)] ->
m (BuildOutputs, [InconsistentMetadata], DepMap)
performIteration iterationNumber cache inconsistencies dependencies = do
let (newInconsistencies, prunedDependencies) = pruneDanglingDependents cache dependencies
case newInconsistencies of
[] -> pure (cache, inconsistencies, HS.fromList . map snd <$> prunedDependencies)
_
| iterationNumber < 100 -> do
let inconsistentIds = nub $ concatMap imObjectIds newInconsistencies
prunedCache = foldl' (flip deleteMetadataObject) cache inconsistentIds
allInconsistencies = inconsistencies <> newInconsistencies
performIteration (iterationNumber + 1) prunedCache allInconsistencies prunedDependencies
| otherwise ->
-- Running for 100 iterations without terminating is (hopefully) enormously unlikely
-- unless we did something very wrong, so halt the process and abort with some
-- debugging information.
throwError
(err500 Unexpected "schema dependency resolution failed to terminate")
{ qeInternal =
Just $
ExtraInternal $
object
[ "inconsistent_objects"
.= object
[ "old" .= inconsistencies,
"new" .= newInconsistencies
],
"pruned_dependencies" .= (map snd <$> prunedDependencies)
]
}
pruneDanglingDependents ::
BuildOutputs ->
HashMap SchemaObjId [(MetadataObject, SchemaDependency)] ->
([InconsistentMetadata], HashMap SchemaObjId [(MetadataObject, SchemaDependency)])
pruneDanglingDependents cache =
fmap (M.filter (not . null)) . traverse do
partitionEithers . map \(metadataObject, dependency) -> case resolveDependency dependency of
Right () -> Right (metadataObject, dependency)
Left errorMessage -> Left (InconsistentObject errorMessage Nothing metadataObject)
where
resolveDependency :: SchemaDependency -> Either Text ()
resolveDependency (SchemaDependency objectId _) = case objectId of
SOSource source ->
void $
M.lookup source (_boSources cache)
`onNothing` Left ("no such source exists: " <>> source)
SORemoteSchema remoteSchemaName ->
unless (remoteSchemaName `M.member` _boRemoteSchemas cache) $
Left $
"remote schema " <> remoteSchemaName <<> " is not found"
SORemoteSchemaPermission remoteSchemaName roleName -> do
remoteSchema <-
onNothing (M.lookup remoteSchemaName $ _boRemoteSchemas cache) $
Left $
"remote schema " <> remoteSchemaName <<> " is not found"
unless (roleName `M.member` _rscPermissions (fst remoteSchema)) $
Left $
"no permission defined on remote schema "
<> remoteSchemaName
<<> " for role "
<>> roleName
SORemoteSchemaRemoteRelationship remoteSchemaName typeName relationshipName -> do
remoteSchema <-
fmap fst $
onNothing (M.lookup remoteSchemaName $ _boRemoteSchemas cache) $
Left $
"remote schema " <> remoteSchemaName <<> " is not found"
void
$ onNothing
(OMap.lookup typeName (_rscRemoteRelationships remoteSchema) >>= OMap.lookup relationshipName)
$ Left
$ "remote relationship "
<> relationshipName
<<> " on type "
<> G.unName typeName
<> " on "
<> remoteSchemaName
<<> " is not found"
SOSourceObj source exists -> do
server/mssql: add cascade to mssql_run_sql <!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ --> ## Description <!-- Please fill thier. --> <!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective --> We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata. This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by -> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown -> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any -> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check ### Related Issues <!-- Please make surt title --> <!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) --> Close #1853 ### Solution and Design <!-- How is this iss --> <!-- It's better if we elaborate --> The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend. ### Steps to test and verify <!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? --> - Create author - article tables and track them - Defined object and array relationships - Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false` - The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception ## Changelog - ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label. ## Affected components <!-- Remove non-affected components from the list --> - ✅ Server - ❎ Console - ❎ CLI - ❎ Docs - ❎ Community Content - ❎ Build System - ✅ Tests - ❎ Other (list it) PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636 GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
2021-10-22 17:49:15 +03:00
AB.dispatchAnyBackend @Backend exists $ \sourceObjId -> do
sourceInfo <- castSourceInfo source sourceObjId
case sourceObjId of
SOITable tableName -> do
void $ resolveTable sourceInfo tableName
SOIFunction functionName ->
void $
M.lookup functionName (_siFunctions sourceInfo)
`onNothing` Left ("function " <> functionName <<> " is not tracked")
SOITableObj tableName tableObjectId -> do
tableInfo <- resolveTable sourceInfo tableName
case tableObjectId of
TOCol columnName ->
void $ resolveField tableInfo (columnToFieldName tableInfo columnName) _FIColumn "column"
TORel relName ->
void $ resolveField tableInfo (fromRel relName) _FIRelationship "relationship"
TOComputedField fieldName ->
void $ resolveField tableInfo (fromComputedField fieldName) _FIComputedField "computed field"
TORemoteRel fieldName ->
void $ resolveField tableInfo (fromRemoteRelationship fieldName) _FIRemoteRelationship "remote relationship"
TOForeignKey constraintName -> do
let foreignKeys = _tciForeignKeys $ _tiCoreInfo tableInfo
unless (isJust $ find ((== constraintName) . _cName . _fkConstraint) foreignKeys) $
Left $
"no foreign key constraint named "
<> constraintName <<> " is "
<> "defined for table " <>> tableName
TOPerm roleName permType -> do
unless (any (permissionIsDefined permType) (tableInfo ^? (tiRolePermInfoMap . ix roleName))) $
Left $
"no "
<> permTypeToCode permType
<> " permission defined on table "
<> tableName <<> " for role " <>> roleName
TOTrigger triggerName ->
unless (M.member triggerName (_tiEventTriggerInfoMap tableInfo)) $
Left $
"no event trigger named " <> triggerName <<> " is defined for table " <>> tableName
SORole roleName ->
void $
(M.lookup roleName (_boRoles cache))
`onNothing` Left ("parent role " <> roleName <<> " does not exist")
castSourceInfo ::
(Backend b) => SourceName -> SourceObjId b -> Either Text (SourceInfo b)
castSourceInfo sourceName _ =
-- TODO: if the cast returns Nothing, we should be throwing an internal error
-- the type of the dependency in sources is not as recorded
(M.lookup sourceName (_boSources cache) >>= unsafeSourceInfo)
`onNothing` Left ("no such source found " <>> sourceName)
resolveTable sourceInfo tableName =
M.lookup tableName (_siTables sourceInfo)
`onNothing` Left ("table " <> tableName <<> " is not tracked")
columnToFieldName :: forall b. (Backend b) => TableInfo b -> Column b -> FieldName
columnToFieldName _ = fromCol @b
resolveField ::
Backend b =>
TableInfo b ->
FieldName ->
Getting (First a) (FieldInfo b) a ->
Text ->
Either Text a
resolveField tableInfo fieldName fieldType fieldTypeName = do
let coreInfo = _tiCoreInfo tableInfo
tableName = tableInfoName tableInfo
fieldInfo <-
M.lookup fieldName (_tciFieldInfoMap coreInfo)
`onNothing` Left
("table " <> tableName <<> " has no field named " <>> fieldName)
(fieldInfo ^? fieldType)
`onNothing` Left
("field " <> fieldName <<> "of table " <> tableName <<> " is not a " <> fieldTypeName)
deleteMetadataObject ::
MetadataObjId -> BuildOutputs -> BuildOutputs
deleteMetadataObject = \case
MOSource name -> boSources %~ M.delete name
MOSourceObjId source exists -> AB.dispatchAnyBackend @Backend exists (\sourceObjId -> boSources %~ M.adjust (deleteObjId sourceObjId) source)
MORemoteSchema name -> boRemoteSchemas %~ M.delete name
MORemoteSchemaPermissions name role -> boRemoteSchemas . ix name . _1 . rscPermissions %~ M.delete role
MORemoteSchemaRemoteRelationship remoteSchema typeName relationshipName ->
boRemoteSchemas . ix remoteSchema . _1 . rscRemoteRelationships . ix typeName %~ OMap.delete relationshipName
MOCronTrigger name -> boCronTriggers %~ M.delete name
MOCustomTypes -> boCustomTypes %~ const mempty
MOAction name -> boActions %~ M.delete name
MOEndpoint name -> boEndpoints %~ M.delete name
MOActionPermission name role -> boActions . ix name . aiPermissions %~ M.delete role
MOInheritedRole name -> boRoles %~ M.delete name
server: Simplify `BuildOutputs` A bunch of configurations are retrieved from the Metadata, then stored in the `BuildOutputs` structure, only to then be forwarded to the `SchemaCache`, with extremely little processing in between. So this simplifies the build pipeline for some parts of the metadata: just construct those things from `Metadata` directly, and store them in the `SchemaCache` without any intermediate container. Why did we have the detour via `BuildOutputs` in the first place? Parts of the Metadata (codified by `MetadataObjId`) can generate _metadata inconsistencies_ and/or _schema dependencies_, which are related. - Metadata inconsistencies are warnings that we show to the user, indicating that there's something wrong with their configuration, and they have to fix it. - Schema dependencies are an internal mechanism that allow us to build a consistent view of the world. For instance, if we have a relationship from DB tables `books` to `authors`, but the `authors` table is inconsistent (e.g. it doesn't exist in the DB), then we have schema dependencies indicating that. The job of `resolveDependencies` is to then drop the relationship, so that we can at least generate a legal GraphQL schema for `books`. If we never generate a schema dependency for a certain fragment of Metadata, then there is no reason to call `resolveDependencies` on it, and so there is no reason to store it in `BuildOutputs`. --- The starting point that allows this refactor is to apply Metadata defaults before it reaches `buildAndCollectInfo`, so that metadata-with-defaults can be used elsewhere. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6609 GitOrigin-RevId: df0c4a7ff9451e10e02a40bf26304b26584ba483
2022-11-15 15:02:55 +03:00
MOQueryCollectionsQuery _ lq -> \bo@BuildOutputs {..} ->
bo
server: Simplify `BuildOutputs` A bunch of configurations are retrieved from the Metadata, then stored in the `BuildOutputs` structure, only to then be forwarded to the `SchemaCache`, with extremely little processing in between. So this simplifies the build pipeline for some parts of the metadata: just construct those things from `Metadata` directly, and store them in the `SchemaCache` without any intermediate container. Why did we have the detour via `BuildOutputs` in the first place? Parts of the Metadata (codified by `MetadataObjId`) can generate _metadata inconsistencies_ and/or _schema dependencies_, which are related. - Metadata inconsistencies are warnings that we show to the user, indicating that there's something wrong with their configuration, and they have to fix it. - Schema dependencies are an internal mechanism that allow us to build a consistent view of the world. For instance, if we have a relationship from DB tables `books` to `authors`, but the `authors` table is inconsistent (e.g. it doesn't exist in the DB), then we have schema dependencies indicating that. The job of `resolveDependencies` is to then drop the relationship, so that we can at least generate a legal GraphQL schema for `books`. If we never generate a schema dependency for a certain fragment of Metadata, then there is no reason to call `resolveDependencies` on it, and so there is no reason to store it in `BuildOutputs`. --- The starting point that allows this refactor is to apply Metadata defaults before it reaches `buildAndCollectInfo`, so that metadata-with-defaults can be used elsewhere. PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6609 GitOrigin-RevId: df0c4a7ff9451e10e02a40bf26304b26584ba483
2022-11-15 15:02:55 +03:00
{ _boEndpoints = removeEndpointsUsingQueryCollection lq _boEndpoints
}
MODataConnectorAgent agentName ->
boBackendCache
%~ (BackendMap.modify @'DataConnector $ BackendInfoWrapper . M.delete agentName . unBackendInfoWrapper)
MOOpenTelemetry subobject ->
case subobject of
OtelSubobjectExporterOtlp -> boOpenTelemetryInfo . otiExporterOtlp .~ Nothing
OtelSubobjectBatchSpanProcessor -> boOpenTelemetryInfo . otiBatchSpanProcessor .~ Nothing
where
deleteObjId :: forall b. (Backend b) => SourceMetadataObjId b -> BackendSourceInfo -> BackendSourceInfo
deleteObjId sourceObjId sourceInfo =
maybe
sourceInfo
(AB.mkAnyBackend . deleteObjFn sourceObjId)
$ unsafeSourceInfo sourceInfo
deleteObjFn :: (Backend b) => SourceMetadataObjId b -> SourceInfo b -> SourceInfo b
deleteObjFn = \case
SMOTable name -> siTables %~ M.delete name
SMOFunction name -> siFunctions %~ M.delete name
SMOFunctionPermission functionName role ->
siFunctions . ix functionName . fiPermissions %~ M.delete role
SMOTableObj tableName tableObjectId ->
siTables . ix tableName %~ case tableObjectId of
MTORel name _ -> tiCoreInfo . tciFieldInfoMap %~ M.delete (fromRel name)
MTOComputedField name -> tiCoreInfo . tciFieldInfoMap %~ M.delete (fromComputedField name)
MTORemoteRelationship name -> tiCoreInfo . tciFieldInfoMap %~ M.delete (fromRemoteRelationship name)
MTOTrigger name -> tiEventTriggerInfoMap %~ M.delete name
MTOPerm roleName PTSelect -> tiRolePermInfoMap . ix roleName . permSel .~ Nothing
MTOPerm roleName PTInsert -> tiRolePermInfoMap . ix roleName . permIns .~ Nothing
MTOPerm roleName PTUpdate -> tiRolePermInfoMap . ix roleName . permUpd .~ Nothing
MTOPerm roleName PTDelete -> tiRolePermInfoMap . ix roleName . permDel .~ Nothing
removeEndpointsUsingQueryCollection :: ListedQuery -> HashMap EndpointName (EndpointMetadata GQLQueryWithText) -> HashMap EndpointName (EndpointMetadata GQLQueryWithText)
removeEndpointsUsingQueryCollection lq endpointMap =
case maybeEndpoint of
Just (n, _) -> M.delete n endpointMap
Nothing -> endpointMap
where
q = _lqQuery lq
maybeEndpoint = find (\(_, def) -> (_edQuery . _ceDefinition) def == q) (M.toList endpointMap)