<!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ -->
## Description ✍️
<!-- Please fill this se-->
<!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective -->
update changelog
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4099
Co-authored-by: Tirumarai Selvan <8663570+tirumaraiselvan@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 5ac6a6bd36f2d0ebf7bd6873a0ea1d297fb92fe1
### Motivation
#2338 introduced a way to validate REST queries against the metadata after a change, to properly report any inconsistency that would emerge from a change in the underlying structure of our schema. However, the way this was done was quite complex and error-prone. Namely: we would use the generated schema parsers to statically execute an introspection query, similar to the one we use for remote schemas, then parse the resulting bytestring as it were coming from a remote schema.
This led to several issues: the code was using remote schema primitives, and was associated with remote schema code, despite being unrelated, which led to absurd situations like creating fake `Variable`s whose type was also their name. A lot of the code had to deal with the fact that we might fail to re-parse our own schema. Additionally, some of it was dead code, that for some reason GHC did not warn about? But more fundamentally, this architecture decision creates a dependency between unrelated pieces of the engine: modifying the internal processing of root fields or the introspection of remote schemas now risks impacting the unrelated `OpenAPI` feature.
### Description
This PR decouples that process from the remote schema introspection logic and from the execution engine by making `Analyse` and `OpenAPI` work on the generic `G.SchemaIntrospection` instead. To accomplish this, it:
- adds `GraphQL.Parser.Schema.Convert`, to convert from our "live" schema back to a flat `SchemaIntrospection`
- persists in the schema cache the `admin` introspection generated when building the schema, and uses it both for validation and for generating the `OpenAPI`.
### Known issues and limitations
This adds a bit of memory pressure to the engine, as we persist the entire schema in the schema cache. This might be acceptable in the short-term, but we have several potential ideas going forward should this be a problem:
- cache the result of `Analyze`: when it becomes possible to build the `OpenAPI` purely with the result of `Analyze` without any additional schema information, then we could cache that instead, reducing the footprint
- caching the `OpenAPI`: if it doesn't need to change every time the endpoint is queried, then it should be possible to cache the entire `OpenAPI` object instead of the schema
- cache a copy of the `FieldParsers` used to generate the schema: as those are persisted through the GraphQL `Context`, and are the only input required to generate the `Schema`, making them accessible in the schema cache would allow us to have the exact same feature with no additional memory cost, at the price of a slightly slower and more complicated process (need to rebuild the `Schema` every time we query the OpenAPI endpoint)
- cache nothing at all, and rebuild the admin schema from scratch every time.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3962
Co-authored-by: paritosh-08 <85472423+paritosh-08@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: a8b9808170b231fdf6787983b4a9ed286cde27e0
### Description
This is it! This PR enables the Metadata API for remote relationships from remote schemas, adds tests, ~~adds documentation~~, adds an entry to the Changelog. This is the release PR that enables the feature.
### Checklist
- [ ] Tests:
- [x] RS-to-Postgres (high level)
- [x] RS-to-RS (high level)
- [x] From RS specifically (testing for edge cases)
- [x] Metadata API tests
- [ ] Unit testing the actual engine?
- [x] Changelog entry
- [ ] Documentation?
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3974
Co-authored-by: Vamshi Surabhi <6562944+0x777@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Bharathi <4211715+scriptnull@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: c9aebf12e6eebef8d264ea831a327b968d4be9d2
In hasura/graphql-engine#5144, we noticed that having remote relationships in the schema is problematic for Relay. In particular, we don't support remote schemas in Relay at all, and because of this, remote relationships were also broken.
The fix was easy: when we're building the schema for Relay, whenever we encounter a remote relationship in our configuration, we simply skip building that field. The implementation was easy: (see hasura/graphql-engine#5145)
```diff
- SFRemoteRelationship info -> pure $ mkRemoteRelationshipFld info
+ SFRemoteRelationship info ->
+ -- https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/5144
+ if isRelay then [] else pure $ mkRemoteRelationshipFld info
```
A test case was added in that PR to prevent us from accidentally re-including remote relationships in the Relay schema. (However, it now looks like that test case does not function correctly.)
The above code was later refactored in #3037, making use of the `MaybeT` effect. However, this effect was not used correctly, so that the result of the check was ignored.
This fixes the code to use the `MaybeT` effect correctly.
CC @0x777 @rakeshkky
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3868
GitOrigin-RevId: e528303e01eacf60173cba1eec1898986cf12359
Numbers from CI for the new (currently noisy) `replace_metadata` adhoc benchmark:
chinook: 0.19s -> 0.16
huge_schema: 36.98s -> 29.89
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3685
GitOrigin-RevId: be79b666858b03e8407c0d89765e9aac0af8d40a
