Commit Graph

26 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Gil Mizrahi
15b3ac0aee ghc 9.2.5
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6777
Co-authored-by: Samir Talwar <47582+SamirTalwar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 916abab76446cf7c4e1e63dc112ba4994ab4d23d
2022-11-15 11:26:42 +00:00
Samir Talwar
342391f39d Upgrade Ormolu to v0.5.
This upgrades the version of Ormolu required by the HGE repository to v0.5.0.1, and reformats all code accordingly.

Ormolu v0.5 reformats code that uses infix operators. This is mostly useful, adding newlines and indentation to make it clear which operators are applied first, but in some cases, it's unpleasant. To make this easier on the eyes, I had to do the following:

* Add a few fixity declarations (search for `infix`)
* Add parentheses to make precedence clear, allowing Ormolu to keep everything on one line
* Rename `relevantEq` to `(==~)` in #6651 and set it to `infix 4`
* Add a few _.ormolu_ files (thanks to @hallettj for helping me get started), mostly for Autodocodec operators that don't have explicit fixity declarations

In general, I think these changes are quite reasonable. They mostly affect indentation.

PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6675
GitOrigin-RevId: cd47d87f1d089fb0bc9dcbbe7798dbceedcd7d83
2022-11-02 20:55:13 +00:00
Vamshi Surabhi
a01d1188f2 scaffolding for remote-schemas module
The main aim of the PR is:

1. To set up a module structure for 'remote-schemas' package.
2. Move parts by the remote schema codebase into the new module structure to validate it.

## Notes to the reviewer

Why a PR with large-ish diff?

1. We've been making progress on the MM project but we don't yet know long it is going to take us to get to the first milestone. To understand this better, we need to figure out the unknowns as soon as possible. Hence I've taken a stab at the first two items in the [end-state](https://gist.github.com/0x777/ca2bdc4284d21c3eec153b51dea255c9) document to figure out the unknowns. Unsurprisingly, there are a bunch of issues that we haven't discussed earlier. These are documented in the 'open questions' section.

1. The diff is large but that is only code moved around and I've added a section that documents how things are moved. In addition, there are fair number of PR comments to help with the review process.

## Changes in the PR

### Module structure

Sets up the module structure as follows:

```
Hasura/
  RemoteSchema/
    Metadata/
      Types.hs
    SchemaCache/
      Types.hs
      Permission.hs
      RemoteRelationship.hs
      Build.hs
    MetadataAPI/
      Types.hs
      Execute.hs
```

### 1. Types representing metadata are moved

Types that capture metadata information (currently scattered across several RQL modules) are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types`.

- This new module only depends on very 'core' modules such as
  `Hasura.Session` for the notion of roles and `Hasura.Incremental` for `Cacheable` typeclass.

- The requirement on database modules is avoided by generalizing the remote schemas metadata to accept an arbitrary 'r' for a remote relationship
  definition.

### 2. SchemaCache related types and build logic have been moved

Types that represent remote schemas information in SchemaCache are moved into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Types`.

Similar to `H.RS.Metadata.Types`, this module depends on 'core' modules except for `Hasura.GraphQL.Parser.Variable`. It has something to do with remote relationships but I haven't spent time looking into it. The validation of 'remote relationships to remote schema' is also something that needs to be looked at.

Rips out the logic that builds remote schema's SchemaCache information from the monolithic `buildSchemaCacheRule` and moves it into `Hasura.RemoteSchema.SchemaCache.Build`. Further, the `.SchemaCache.Permission` and `.SchemaCache.RemoteRelationship` have been created from existing modules that capture schema cache building logic for those two components.

This was a fair amount of work. On main, currently remote schema's SchemaCache information is built in two phases - in the first phase, 'permissions' and 'remote relationships' are ignored and in the second phase they are filled in.

While remote relationships can only be resolved after partially resolving sources and other remote schemas, the same isn't true for permissions. Further, most of the work that is done to resolve remote relationships can be moved to the first phase so that the second phase can be a very simple traversal.

This is the approach that was taken - resolve permissions and as much as remote relationships information in the first phase.

### 3. Metadata APIs related types and build logic have been moved

The types that represent remote schema related metadata APIs and the execution logic have been moved to `Hasura.RemoteSchema.MetadataAPI.Types` and `.Execute` modules respectively.

## Open questions:

1. `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.Types` is so called because I was hoping that all of the metadata related APIs of remote schema can be brought in at `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.API`. However, as metadata APIs depended on functions from `SchemaCache` module (see [1](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L55)) and [2](ceba6d6226/server/src-lib/Hasura/RQL/DDL/RemoteSchema.hs (L91)), it made more sense to create a separate top-level module for `MetadataAPI`s.

   Maybe we can just have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata` and get rid of the extra nesting or have `Hasura.RemoteSchema.Metadata.{Core,Permission,RemoteRelationship}` if we want to break them down further.

1. `buildRemoteSchemas` in `H.RS.SchemaCache.Build` has the following type:

   ```haskell
   buildRemoteSchemas ::
     ( ArrowChoice arr,
       Inc.ArrowDistribute arr,
       ArrowWriter (Seq CollectedInfo) arr,
       Inc.ArrowCache m arr,
       MonadIO m,
       HasHttpManagerM m,
       Inc.Cacheable remoteRelationshipDefinition,
       ToJSON remoteRelationshipDefinition,
       MonadError QErr m
     ) =>
     Env.Environment ->
     ( (Inc.Dependency (HashMap RemoteSchemaName Inc.InvalidationKey), OrderedRoles),
       [RemoteSchemaMetadataG remoteRelationshipDefinition]
     )
       `arr` HashMap RemoteSchemaName (PartiallyResolvedRemoteSchemaCtxG remoteRelationshipDefinition, MetadataObject)
   ```

   Note the dependence on `CollectedInfo` which is defined as

   ```haskell
   data CollectedInfo
     = CIInconsistency InconsistentMetadata
     | CIDependency
         MetadataObject
         -- ^ for error reporting on missing dependencies
         SchemaObjId
         SchemaDependency
     deriving (Eq)
   ```

   this pretty much means that remote schemas is dependent on types from databases, actions, ....

   How do we fix this? Maybe introduce a typeclass such as `ArrowCollectRemoteSchemaDependencies` which is defined in `Hasura.RemoteSchema` and then implemented in graphql-engine?

1. The dependency on `buildSchemaCacheFor` in `.MetadataAPI.Execute` which has the following signature:

   ```haskell
   buildSchemaCacheFor ::
     (QErrM m, CacheRWM m, MetadataM m) =>
     MetadataObjId ->
     MetadataModifier ->
   ```

   This can be easily resolved if we restrict what the metadata APIs are allowed to do. Currently, they operate in an unfettered access to modify SchemaCache (the `CacheRWM` constraint):

   ```haskell
   runAddRemoteSchema ::
     ( QErrM m,
       CacheRWM m,
       MonadIO m,
       HasHttpManagerM m,
       MetadataM m,
       Tracing.MonadTrace m
     ) =>
     Env.Environment ->
     AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
     m EncJSON
   ```

   This should instead be changed to restrict remote schema APIs to only modify remote schema metadata (but has access to the remote schemas part of the schema cache), this dependency is completely removed.

   ```haskell
   runAddRemoteSchema ::
     ( QErrM m,
       MonadIO m,
       HasHttpManagerM m,
       MonadReader RemoteSchemasSchemaCache m,
       MonadState RemoteSchemaMetadata m,
       Tracing.MonadTrace m
     ) =>
     Env.Environment ->
     AddRemoteSchemaQuery ->
     m RemoteSchemeMetadataObjId
   ```

   The idea is that the core graphql-engine would call these functions and then call
   `buildSchemaCacheFor`.

PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/6291
GitOrigin-RevId: 51357148c6404afe70219afa71bd1d59bdf4ffc6
2022-10-21 03:15:04 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
3cbcbd9291 Remove RQL/Types.hs
## Description

This PR removes `RQL.Types`, which was now only re-exporting a bunch of unrelated modules.

PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/4363
GitOrigin-RevId: 894f29a19bff70b3dad8abc5d9858434d5065417
2022-04-27 13:58:47 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
6e1761f8f9 Enable remote joins from remote schemas in the execution engine.
### Description

This PR adds the ability to perform remote joins from remote schemas in the engine. To do so, we alter the definition of an `ExecutionStep` targeting a remote schema: the `ExecStepRemote` constructor now expects a `Maybe RemoteJoins`. This new argument is used when processing the execution step, in the transport layer (either `Transport.HTTP` or `Transport.WebSocket`).

For this `Maybe RemoteJoins` to be extracted from a parsed query, this PR also extends the `Execute.RemoteJoin.Collect` module, to implement "collection" from a selection set. Not only do those new functions extract the remote joins, but they also apply all necessary transformations to the selection sets (such as inserting the necessary "phantom" fields used as join keys).

Finally in `Execute.RemoteJoin.Join`, we make two changes. First, we now always look for nested remote joins, regardless of whether the join we just performed went to a source or a remote schema; and second we adapt our join tree logic according to the special cases that were added to deal with remote server edge cases.

Additionally, this PR refactors / cleans / documents `Execute.RemoteJoin.RemoteServer`. This is not required as part of this change and could be moved to a separate PR if needed (a similar cleanup of `Join` is done independently in #3894). It also introduces a draft of a new documentation page for this project, that will be refined in the release PR that ships the feature (either #3069 or a copy of it).

While this PR extends the engine, it doesn't plug such relationships in the schema, meaning that, as of this PR, the new code paths in `Join` are technically unreachable. Adding the corresponding schema code and, ultimately, enabling the metadata API will be done in subsequent PRs.

### Keeping track of concrete type names

The main change this PR makes to the existing `Join` code is to handle a new reserved field we sometimes use when targeting remote servers: the `__hasura_internal_typename` field. In short, a GraphQL selection set can sometimes "branch" based on the concrete "runtime type" of the object on which the selection happens:

```graphql
query {
  author(id: 53478) {
    ... on Writer {
      name
      articles {
        title
      }
    }
    ... on Artist {
      name
      articles {
        title
      }
    }
  }
}
```

If both of those `articles` are remote joins, we need to be able, when we get the answer, to differentiate between the two different cases. We do this by asking for `__typename`, to be able to decide if we're in the `Writer` or the `Artist` branch of the query.

To avoid further processing / customization of results, we only insert this `__hasura_internal_typename: __typename` field in the query in the case of unions of interfaces AND if we have the guarantee that we will processing the request as part of the remote joins "folding": that is, if there's any remote join in this branch in the tree. Otherwise, we don't insert the field, and we leave that part of the response untouched.

PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3810
GitOrigin-RevId: 89aaf16274d68e26ad3730b80c2d2fdc2896b96c
2022-03-09 03:18:22 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
a1886b3729 Generalize remote schemas IR
### Description

This PR is one further step towards remote joins from remote schemas. It introduces a custom partial AST to represent queries to remote schemas in the IR: we now need to augment what used to be a straightforward GraphQL AST with additional information for remote join fields.

This PR does the minimal amount of work to adjust the rest of the code accordingly, using `Void` in all places that expect a type representing remote relationships.

PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3794
GitOrigin-RevId: 33fc317731aace71f82ad158a1951ea93350d6cc
2022-02-25 20:38:46 +00:00
Naveen Naidu
2e823234f9 server/remote-schema: Include OperationName in the request sent to remote schemas
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3581
Co-authored-by: Puru Gupta <32328846+purugupta99@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 2db21d0df158a5a3229b883ee426b2f38f864f80
2022-02-16 07:55:19 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
a023a3259d Prevent uses of unsafeMkName whenever possible.
### Description

This PR is the result of a discussion in #3363. Namely, we would like to remove all uses of `unsafeMkName`, or at the very least document every single one of them, to avoid similar issues. To do so, this PR does the following:
- it adds a hlint suggestion not to use that function:
  - suggestions don't mark the PR as failed, but will be shown at review time
  - it is possible to disable that hint with `{- HLINT ignore myFunction "unsafe" -}`
- wherever possible, it removes uses of `unsafeMkName` in favour of `mkName`
- it adds a comment with a tracking issue for the two remaining uses:
  - #3478
  - #3479

### Remaining work

- discuss whether this hint should make the linter step fail, since the linter step isn't required to merge anyway, and there is a way to disable the hint wherever we think the use of that function is acceptable
- check that none of those uses were load-bearing and result in errors now

PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3480
GitOrigin-RevId: 0a7e3e9d1a48185764c04ab61e34b58273af347c
2022-01-27 15:13:37 +00:00
David Overton
5bfce057c6 Refactor remote schema customization
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2771
GitOrigin-RevId: 0c90136f956df3f4552140e6ca3d2f4766f8b3f5
2021-11-30 00:38:27 +00:00
David Overton
aac64f2c81 Source typename customization (close graphql-engine#6974)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1616
GitOrigin-RevId: f7eefd2367929209aa77895ea585e96a99a78d47
2021-10-29 14:43:14 +00:00
Robert
11a454c2d6 server, pro: actually reformat the code-base using ormolu
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`.

For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts.
To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>`
by the hash of *this* commit.

$ git checkout my-feature-branch
$ git merge <format-commit>^    # and resolve conflicts normally
$ make format
$ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu"
$ git merge -s ours post-ormolu

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404

GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
2021-09-23 22:57:37 +00:00
jkachmar
c322af93f8 server: Uses GraphQL type in remote variable cache key
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1801

GitOrigin-RevId: 98843e422b2431849b675acdb318ffae2f492f18
2021-08-04 21:24:36 +00:00
David Overton
1abb1dee69 Remote Schema Customization take 2 using parser tranformations
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1740

GitOrigin-RevId: e807952058243a97f67cd9969fa434933a08652f
2021-07-30 11:33:59 +00:00
Vamshi Surabhi
e8e4f30dd6 server: support remote relationships on SQL Server and BigQuery (#1497)
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.

This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).

The approach now changes to this:

1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.

1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.

1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.

### Known issues

1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.

1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.

1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.

1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.

1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.

### Notes to the reviewers

I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.

1. The first one is very straight forward.

1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality.  This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module.  Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore

1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor

1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.

https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497

GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
2021-06-11 03:27:39 +00:00
Vamshi Surabhi
96104ec1a8 Revert "remote schema typename customisation"
This reverts the remote schema type customisation and namespacing feature temporarily as we test for certain conditions.

GitOrigin-RevId: f8ee97233da4597f703970c3998664c03582d8e7
2021-06-10 09:57:16 +00:00
David Overton
4a69fdeb01 Dmoverton/5863 prefix namespacing
GitOrigin-RevId: 108e8b25e745cb4f74d143d316262049cef62b70
2021-06-09 22:42:05 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
6e95f761f5 server: rewrite remote input parsers to deal with partial variable expansion (fix hasura/graphql-engine#6656)
GitOrigin-RevId: e0b197a0fd1e259d43e6152b726b350c4d527a4b
2021-05-24 20:13:47 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
2152911e24 server: introduce Hasura.Base (take 2)
GitOrigin-RevId: 0dd10f1ccd338b1cf382ebff59b6ee7f209d39a1
2021-05-11 15:19:33 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
377425ff2d server: generalize subscriptions
GitOrigin-RevId: 464e80abf151032dc50eaf6cf8dafc5e7cfa51cd
2021-02-20 13:46:43 +00:00
Antoine Leblanc
1ca4034697 server: generalize execution of queries and mutations
GitOrigin-RevId: aff477a0849d4667f2f6dc6804d6ca2982e53f95
2021-02-12 03:05:05 +00:00
hasura-bot
98ccd81704 Server: Remote relationships permissions
GITHUB_PR_NUMBER: 6125
GITHUB_PR_URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/6125

Co-authored-by: Karthikeyan Chinnakonda <15602904+codingkarthik@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 53d0671e6335dad1af7cb00e3e05e7021a910673
2021-01-19 20:57:58 +00:00
Rakesh Emmadi
29f2ddc289 server: support separate metadata database and server code setup for multi sources (#197)
This is an incremental PR towards https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/5797

Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: a6cb8c239b2ff840a0095e78845f682af0e588a9
2020-12-28 12:56:55 +00:00
Karthikeyan Chinnakonda
39a4352569 Merge pull request #113 from hasura/karthikeyan/remote-schema-permissions
server: remote schema permissions
GitOrigin-RevId: 63b9717e30351676c9474bdfddd3ad1ee1409eea
2020-12-21 09:12:35 +00:00
Tirumarai Selvan
b544b87b9b Merge pull request #223 from hasura/jberryman/5863-prep-refactoring
GitOrigin-RevId: 71b1453edf4b93ffc16a15ea3c6057bb865b6606
2020-12-20 06:53:38 +00:00
Karthikeyan Chinnakonda
3ea611f9fd
Server: Validate remote schema queries (#5938)
* [skip ci] use the args while making the fieldParser

* modify the execution part of the remote queries

* parse union queries deeply

* add test for remote schema field validation

* add tests for validating remote query arguments


Co-authored-by: Auke Booij <auke@hasura.io>
Co-authored-by: kodiakhq[bot] <49736102+kodiakhq[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
2020-10-13 14:03:11 +05:30
Auke Booij
84a129c8e4
server: heterogeneous execution of GraphQL queries (#5869)
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/pull/5869
2020-10-07 10:23:17 +00:00