Issue: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/7510
Problem:
- To mark the migration applied after creating the migration from the server with skip-execution flag
Solution:
After creating migration apply it with skip-execution true
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2333
Co-authored-by: Aravind K P <8335904+scriptonist@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 72eca352b76afe3a19d2198169b31284e38af07a
>
### Description
>
While adding [insert mutation schema parser for MSSQL backend](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2141) I also included [identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_column) notion to table columns across all backends. In MSSQL we cannot insert any value (even `DEFAULT` expression) into Identity columns. This behavior of identity columns is not same in Postgres as we can insert values. This PR drops the notion of identity in the column info. The context of identity columns for MSSQL is carried in `ExtraTableMetadata` type.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
- [ ] Console
- [ ] CLI
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Community Content
- [ ] Build System
- [x] Tests
- [ ] Other (list it)
### Related Issues
->
Fix https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/7557https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2378
GitOrigin-RevId: c18b5708e2e6107423a0a95a7fc2e9721e8a21a1
### Description
We always build a subscription root, even when there was no possible fields. This breaks some third party clients, as the spec does not allow empty types in the schema. This PR fixes this by changing the `buildSubscriptionParser` helper to return a `Maybe` value, and harmonizes / cleans places where we build the subscription root.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2357
GitOrigin-RevId: 1aeae25e321eee957e7645c436d17e69207309fd
### Description
During the PDV refactor that led to 2.0, we broke an undocumented and untested semantic of inserts: accepting _explicit_ null values in nested object inserts.
In short: in the schema, we often distinguish between _explicit_ null values `{id: 3, author: null}` and _implicit_ null values that correspond to the field being omitted `{id: 3}`. In this particular case, we forgot to accept explicit null values. Since the field is optional (meaning we accept implicit null values), it was nullable in the schema, like it was in pre-PDV times. But in practice we would reject explicit nulls.
This PR fixes this, and adds a test. Furthermore, it does a bit of a cleanup of the Mutation part of the schema, and more specifically of all insertion code.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2341
GitOrigin-RevId: 895cfeecef7e8e49903a3fb37987707150446eb0
### Description
- Tracking functions that return a single row were unsupported, this was fixed with -> [this](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/4299#issuecomment-911553730)
- This PR updates the console to list functions that return a single row as trackable
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Console
### Related Issues
#2281
### Solution and Design
>
### Steps to test and verify
- Create the following table
```sql
create table users (
"id" int primary key,
"name" text
);
```
- Create a function that returns one row, (don't tick track function)
```sql
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION public.me()
RETURNS users
LANGUAGE sql
STABLE
AS $function$
select *
from public.users
where id = 1;
$function$
```
- click on the schema and the function should appear in untracked functions
<img width="614" alt="Screenshot 2021-09-13 at 11 18 30" src="https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/28978422/133067170-24d5adc7-73d4-44ae-941f-ed790d2d861c.png">
---
### Kodiak commit message
Information used by [Kodiak bot](https://kodiakhq.com/) while merging this PR.
#### Commit title
Same as the title of this pull request
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2329
Co-authored-by: Ikechukwu Eze <22247592+iykekings@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 6365a1bf35205a51e995c2b17104eb2f79563756
The materialized views cannot be mutated, so this commit removes the option to run mutation on the materialized views via graphql endpoint. Before this, users could have tried running mutation for the materialized views using the graphql endpoint (or from HGE console), which would have resulted in the following error:
``` JSON
{
"errors": [
{
"extensions": {
"internal": {
"statement": "WITH \"articles_mat_view__mutation_result_alias\" AS (DELETE FROM \"public\".\"articles_mat_view\" WHERE (('true') AND (((((\"public\".\"articles_mat_view\".\"id\") = (('20155721-961c-4d8b-a5c4-873ed62c7a61')::uuid)) AND ('true')) AND ('true')) AND ('true'))) RETURNING * ), \"articles_mat_view__all_columns_alias\" AS (SELECT \"id\" , \"author_id\" , \"content\" , \"test_col\" , \"test_col2\" FROM \"articles_mat_view__mutation_result_alias\" ) SELECT json_build_object('affected_rows', (SELECT COUNT(*) FROM \"articles_mat_view__all_columns_alias\" ) ) ",
"prepared": false,
"error": {
"exec_status": "FatalError",
"hint": null,
"message": "cannot change materialized view \"articles_mat_view\"",
"status_code": "42809",
"description": null
},
"arguments": []
},
"path": "$",
"code": "unexpected"
},
"message": "database query error"
}
]
}
```
So, we don't want to generate the mutation fields for the materialized views altogether.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2226
GitOrigin-RevId: 4ef441764035a8039e1c780d454569ee1f2febc3
When adding object relationships, we set the nullability of the generated GraphQL field based on whether the database backend enforces that the referenced data always exists. For manual relationships (corresponding to `manual_configuration`), the database backend is unaware of any relationship between data, and hence such fields are always set to be nullable.
For relationships generated from foreign key constraints (corresponding to `foreign_key_constraint_on`), we distinguish between two cases:
1. The "forward" object relationship from a referencing table (i.e. which has the foreign key constraint) to a referenced table. This should be set to be non-nullable when all referencing columns are non-nullable. But in fact, it used to set it to be non-nullable if *any* referencing column is non-nullable, which is only correct in Postgres when `MATCH FULL` is set (a flag we don't consider). This fixes that by changing a boolean conjunction to a disjunction.
2. The "reverse" object relationship from a referenced table to a referencing table which has the foreign key constraint. This should always be set to be nullable. But in fact, it used to always be set to non-nullable, as was reported in hasura/graphql-engine#7201. This fixes that.
Moreover, we have moved the computation of the nullability from `Hasura.RQL.DDL.Relationship` to `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema.Select`: this nullability used to be passed through the `riIsNullable` field of `RelInfo`, but for array relationships this information is not actually used, and moreover the remaining fields of `RelInfo` are already enough to deduce the nullability.
This also adds regression tests for both (1) and (2) above.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2159
GitOrigin-RevId: 617f12765614f49746d18d3368f41dfae2f3e6ca
>
### Description
>
This PR supersedes https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1484. Apply `limit` to the table selection before joining relationship rows to improve query performance.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
### Related Issues
->
Fix https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/5745
### Solution and Design
>
Prior to this change, we apply `LIMIT` and `OFFSET` to the outer selection from sub-query which includes joins for relationships. Now, we move `LIMIT` and `OFFSET` (if present) to inner selection of base table. But, this isn't done always! If there are order by relationships' columns we apply at the outer selection. To know more, please refer to [source code note](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2078/files#diff-46d868ee45d3eaac667cebb34731f573c77d5c9c8097bb9ccf1115fc07f65bfdR652).
```graphql
query {
article(limit: 2){
id
title
content
author{
name
}
}
}
```
Before:
```sql
SELECT
coalesce(json_agg("root"), '[]') AS "root"
FROM
(
SELECT
row_to_json(
(
SELECT
"_4_e"
FROM
(
SELECT
"_0_root.base"."id" AS "id",
"_0_root.base"."title" AS "title",
"_0_root.base"."content" AS "content",
"_3_root.or.author"."author" AS "author"
) AS "_4_e"
)
) AS "root"
FROM
(
SELECT
*
FROM
"public"."article"
WHERE
('true')
) AS "_0_root.base"
LEFT OUTER JOIN LATERAL (
SELECT
row_to_json(
(
SELECT
"_2_e"
FROM
(
SELECT
"_1_root.or.author.base"."name" AS "name"
) AS "_2_e"
)
) AS "author"
FROM
(
SELECT
*
FROM
"public"."author"
WHERE
(("_0_root.base"."author_id") = ("id"))
) AS "_1_root.or.author.base"
) AS "_3_root.or.author" ON ('true')
LIMIT
2
) AS "_5_root"
```
cost
```
Aggregate (cost=0.73..0.74 rows=1 width=32)
-> Limit (cost=0.15..0.71 rows=2 width=32)
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.15..223.96 rows=810 width=32)
-> Seq Scan on article (cost=0.00..18.10 rows=810 width=72)
-> Index Scan using author_pkey on author (cost=0.15..0.24 rows=1 width=36)
Index Cond: (article.author_id = id)
SubPlan 1
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=32)
SubPlan 2
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=32)
```
After:
```sql
SELECT
coalesce(json_agg("root"), '[]') AS "root"
FROM
(
SELECT
row_to_json(
(
SELECT
"_4_e"
FROM
(
SELECT
"_0_root.base"."id" AS "id",
"_0_root.base"."title" AS "title",
"_0_root.base"."content" AS "content",
"_3_root.or.author"."author" AS "author"
) AS "_4_e"
)
) AS "root"
FROM
(
SELECT
*
FROM
"public"."article"
WHERE
('true')
LIMIT
2
) AS "_0_root.base"
LEFT OUTER JOIN LATERAL (
SELECT
row_to_json(
(
SELECT
"_2_e"
FROM
(
SELECT
"_1_root.or.author.base"."name" AS "name"
) AS "_2_e"
)
) AS "author"
FROM
(
SELECT
*
FROM
"public"."author"
WHERE
(("_0_root.base"."author_id") = ("id"))
) AS "_1_root.or.author.base"
) AS "_3_root.or.author" ON ('true')
) AS "_5_root"
```
cost:
```
Aggregate (cost=16.47..16.48 rows=1 width=32)
-> Nested Loop Left Join (cost=0.15..16.44 rows=2 width=100)
-> Limit (cost=0.00..0.04 rows=2 width=72)
-> Seq Scan on article (cost=0.00..18.10 rows=810 width=72)
-> Index Scan using author_pkey on author (cost=0.15..8.18 rows=1 width=36)
Index Cond: (article.author_id = id)
SubPlan 1
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=32)
SubPlan 2
-> Result (cost=0.00..0.01 rows=1 width=32)
```
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2078
Co-authored-by: Evie Ciobanu <1017953+eviefp@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 47eaccdbfb3499efd2c9f733f3312ad31c77916f
>
### Description
>
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Console
### Related Issues
closes [#7336](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/7336)
### Steps to test and verify
- Add a scalar computed field with only table row as argument, to the table you want to use for testing
- Then head to table's permission tab, and try to use permission builder to set permissions for any role
- confirm that computed fields are listed as options along table columns
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2056
GitOrigin-RevId: 2cd16ca4a0e6a6288d4b62549ebe1aaaf841952b
>
### Description
>
From HGE version 2.0 onwards, all remote relationship fields are generated as plain types without non-nullable and lists. This PR fixes the same.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
- [x] Tests
### Related Issues
->
fix https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/7284
### Steps to test and verify
>
- Create a remote relationship to a field in remote schema with non-nullable or list type
- The HGE introspection should give the remote relationship field type correctly as like in the remote schema
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2071
GitOrigin-RevId: e113f5d17b62bfa0a25028c20260ae1782ae224b
