…rmance
It makes sense to try to utilize multiple threads for metadata
operations since we expect them to come one at a time (and likely at
lower load periods anyway).
As noted, although we build roles in parallel now, the admin role is
still a bottleneck. For replace_metadata on huge_schema, on my machine
I get:
BEFORE: 22.7 sec
AFTER: 13.5 sec
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3911
GitOrigin-RevId: 4d4ee6ac8b5506603e70e4fc666a3aacc054d493
### Description
Several libraries define `catMaybes` as `mapMaybe id`. We had it defined in `Data.HashMap.Strict.Extended` already. This small PR also defines it in `Extended` modules for other containers and replaces every occurrence of `mapMaybe id` accordingly.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3884
GitOrigin-RevId: d222a2ca2f4eb9b725b20450a62a626d3886dbf4
TL;DR
---
We go from this:
```haskell
(|
withRecordInconsistency
( (|
modifyErrA
( do
(info, dependencies) <- liftEitherA -< buildRelInfo relDef
recordDependencies -< (metadataObject, schemaObject, dependencies)
returnA -< info
)
|) (addTableContext @b table . addRelationshipContext)
)
|) metadataObject
```
to this:
```haskell
withRecordInconsistencyM metadataObject $ do
modifyErr (addTableContext @b table . addRelationshipContext) $ do
(info, dependencies) <- liftEither $ buildRelInfo relDef
recordDependenciesM metadataObject schemaObject dependencies
return info
```
Background
---
We use Haskell's `Arrows` language extension to gain some syntactic sugar when working with `Arrow`s. `Arrow`s are a programming abstraction comparable to `Monad`s.
Unfortunately the syntactic sugar provided by this language extension is not very sweet.
This PR shows how we can sometimes avoid using `Arrow`s altogether, without loss of functionality or correctness. It is a demo of a technique that can be used to cut down the amount of `Arrows`-based code in our codebase by about half.
Approach
---
Although _in general_ not every `Monad` is an `Arrow`, specific `Arrow` instantiations are exactly as powerful as their `Monad` equivalents. Otherwise they wouldn't be very equivalent, would they?
Just like `liftEither` interprets the `Either e` monad into an arbitrary monad implementing `MonadError e`, we add `interpA` which interprets certain concrete monads such as `Writer w` into specific arrows, e.g. ones satisfying `ArrowWriter w`. This means that the part of the code that only uses such interpretable effects can be written _monadically_, and then used in _arrow_ constructions down the line.
This approach cannot be used for arrow effects which do not have a monadic equivalent. In our codebase, the only instance of this is `ArrowCache m`, implemented by the `Rule m` arrow. So code written with `ArrowCache m` in the context cannot be rewritten monadically using this technique.
See also
---
- #1827
- #2210
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3543
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: eb79619c95f7a571bce99bc144ce42ee65d08505
There are three minor cleanups here:
- The first argument to the `setMetadataInCatalog` method is always `Just`. It is thus important to avoid `Maybe`, because this means that a crucial piece of code (saving metadata) is completely untested.
- Rather than spelling them out, we can derive the `Semigroup`/`Monoid` instances for `MetadataModifier` through the `Endo` type.
- I've renamed the name of the getter of the `MetadataModifier` newtype to **r**unMetadataModifier. Using record puns, this allows us to write:
```diff
- putMetadata $ unMetadataModifier metadataModifier metadata
+ putMetadata $ runMetadataModifier metadata
```
which is nicer to read.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3703
GitOrigin-RevId: fd36b3c5202017f5afc943c01dfdd7c82c099bdd
We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema.
Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects.
We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e46 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type:
```haskell
tableSelectionSet ::
forall b r m n.
MonadBuildSchema b r m n =>
SourceName ->
TableInfo b ->
SelPermInfo b ->
m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b))
```
There are three reasons to change this.
1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125.
2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read.
3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068.
Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter.
One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role.
So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608
GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
spec: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2278
Briefly:
- extend metadata so that allowlist entries get a new scope field
- update `add_collection_to_allowlist` to accept this new scope field,
and adds `update_scope_of_collection_in_allowlist` to change the scope
- scope can be global or role-based; a collection is available for every
role if it is global, and available to every listed role if it is role-based
- graphql-engine-oss is aware of role-based allowlist metadata; collections
with non-global scope are treated as if they weren't in the allowlist
To run the tests:
- `cabal run graphql-engine-tests -- unit --match Allowlist`
- py-tests against pro:
- launch `graphql-engine-pro` with `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ADMIN_SECRET` and `HASURA_GRAPHQL_ENABLE_ALLOWLIST`
- `pytest test_allowlist_queries.py --hge-urls=... --pg-urls=... --hge-key=... --test-allowlist-queries --pro-tests`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2477
Co-authored-by: Anon Ray <616387+ecthiender@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Robert <132113+robx@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 01f8026fbe59d8701e2de30986511a452fce1a99
## Description
This PR is a subset of #3069, that does roughly that #3031 was aiming to do: add the schema cache building phase for relationships from remote servers. This PR does not change any of the code that *uses* remote relationships, meaning we ignore the added schema cache information. It also contains dependency-tracking code, which was originally missing from #3031; in turn, this pulls some of the metadata API as well, since we identify remote relationships by how they were created.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3540
GitOrigin-RevId: ed962b6d07fd4adbf0a71e0d79736a4e8b422fea
This PR pretty much does the same thing to remote relationship types in schemacache as what #2979 did to remote relationship types in the IR. On main remote relationships are represented by types of form `T from to`. This PR changes it to `T from` which makes it a lot more reusable.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3037
GitOrigin-RevId: 90a5c9e2346c8dc2da6ec5b8c970d6c863d2afb8
## Description
This PR fixes two issues:
- in [#2903](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2903), we introduced a new metadata representation of remote relationships, which broke parsing a metadata blob containing an old-style db-to-rs remote relationship
- in [#1179](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1179), we silently and mistakenly deprecated `create_remote_relationship` in favour of `<backend>_create_remote_relationship`
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3124
Co-authored-by: jkachmar <8461423+jkachmar@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Antoine Leblanc <1618949+nicuveo@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: 45481db7a8d42c7612e938707cd2d652c4c81bf8
GraphQL types can refer to each other in a circular way. The PDV framework used to use values of type `Unique` to recognize two fragments of GraphQL schema as being the same instance. Internally, this is based on `Data.Unique` from the `base` package, which simply increases a counter on every creation of a `Unique` object.
**NB**: The `Unique` values are _not_ used for knot tying the schema combinators themselves (i.e. `Parser`s). The knot tying for `Parser`s is purely based on keys provided to `memoizeOn`. The `Unique` values are _only_ used to recognize two pieces of GraphQL _schema_ as being identical. Originally, the idea was that this would help us with a perfectly correct identification of GraphQL types. But this fully correct equality checking of GraphQL types was never implemented, and does not seem to be necessary to prevent bugs.
Specifically, these `Unique` values are stored as part of `data Definition a`, which specifies a part of our internal abstract syntax tree for the GraphQL types that we expose. The `Unique` values get initialized by the `SchemaT` effect.
In #2894 and #2895, we are experimenting with how (parts of) the GraphQL types can be hidden behind certain permission predicates. This would allow a single GraphQL schema in memory to serve all roles, implementing #2711. The permission predicates get evaluated at query parsing time when we know what role is doing a certain request, thus outputting the correct GraphQL types for that role.
If the approach of #2895 is followed, then the `Definition` objects, and thus the `Unique` values, would be hidden behind the permission predicates. Since the permission predicates are evaluated only after the schema is already supposed to be built, this means that the permission predicates would prevent us from initializing the `Unique` values, rendering them useless.
The simplest remedy to this is to remove our usage of `Unique` altogether from the GraphQL schema and schema combinators. It doesn't serve a functional purpose, doesn't prevent bugs, and requires extra bookkeeping.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2980
GitOrigin-RevId: 50d3f9e0b9fbf578ac49c8fc773ba64a94b1f43d
We'll see if this improves compile times at all, but I think it's worth
doing as at least the most minimal form of module documentation.
This was accomplished by first compiling everything with
-ddump-minimal-imports, and then a bunch of scripting (with help from
ormolu)
**EDIT** it doesn't seem to improve CI compile times but the noise floor is high as it looks like we're not caching library dependencies anymore
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2730
GitOrigin-RevId: 667eb8de1e0f1af70420cbec90402922b8b84cb4
<!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ -->
## Description
<!-- Please fill thier. -->
<!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective -->
We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata.
This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by
-> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown
-> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any
-> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check
### Related Issues
<!-- Please make surt title -->
<!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) -->
Close#1853
### Solution and Design
<!-- How is this iss -->
<!-- It's better if we elaborate -->
The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend.
### Steps to test and verify
<!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? -->
- Create author - article tables and track them
- Defined object and array relationships
- Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false`
- The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception
## Changelog
- ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR.
If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
## Affected components
<!-- Remove non-affected components from the list -->
- ✅ Server
- ❎ Console
- ❎ CLI
- ❎ Docs
- ❎ Community Content
- ❎ Build System
- ✅ Tests
- ❎ Other (list it)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636
GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
The only real use was for the dubious multitenant option
--consoleAssetsVersion, which actually overrode not just
the assets version. I.e., as far as I can tell, if you pass
--consoleAssetsVersion to multitenant, that version will
also make it into e.g. HTTP client user agent headers as
the proper graphql-engine version.
I'm dropping that option, since it seems unused in production
and I don't want to go to the effort of fixing it, but am happy
to look into that if folks feels strongly that it should be
kept.
(Reason for attacking this is that I was looking into http
client things around blacklisting, and the versioning thing
is a bit painful around http client headers.)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2458
GitOrigin-RevId: a02b05557124bdba9f65e96b3aa2746aeee03f4a
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`.
For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts.
To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>`
by the hash of *this* commit.
$ git checkout my-feature-branch
$ git merge <format-commit>^ # and resolve conflicts normally
$ make format
$ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu"
$ git merge -s ours post-ormolu
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404
GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
### Description
This PR improves error messages in our metadata API by displaying a message with the name of the failing command and a link to our documentation. Furthermore, it harmonizes our internal uses of `withObject`, to respect the convention of using the Haskell type name, now that the Aeson error message is displayed as an "internal error message".
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1905
GitOrigin-RevId: e4064ba3290306437aa7e45faa316c60e51bc6b6
>
### Description
>
While adding [insert mutation schema parser for MSSQL backend](https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2141) I also included [identity](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Identity_column) notion to table columns across all backends. In MSSQL we cannot insert any value (even `DEFAULT` expression) into Identity columns. This behavior of identity columns is not same in Postgres as we can insert values. This PR drops the notion of identity in the column info. The context of identity columns for MSSQL is carried in `ExtraTableMetadata` type.
### Changelog
- [x] `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR. If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
### Affected components
- [x] Server
- [ ] Console
- [ ] CLI
- [ ] Docs
- [ ] Community Content
- [ ] Build System
- [x] Tests
- [ ] Other (list it)
### Related Issues
->
Fix https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine/issues/7557https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2378
GitOrigin-RevId: c18b5708e2e6107423a0a95a7fc2e9721e8a21a1
This is a follow-up to #1959.
Today, I spent a while in review figuring out that a harmless PR change didn't do anything,
because it was moving from a `runLazy...` to something without the `Lazy`. So let's get
that source of confusion removed.
This should be a bit easier to review commit by commit, since some of the functions had
confusing names. (E.g. there was a misnamed `Migrate.Internal.runTx` before.)
The change should be a no-op.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2335
GitOrigin-RevId: 0f284c4c0f814482d7827e7732a6d49e7735b302
