We build the GraphQL schema by combining building blocks such as `tableSelectionSet` and `columnParser`. These building blocks individually build `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects. Those object specify the valid GraphQL schema.
Since the GraphQL schema is role-dependent, at some point we need to know what fragment of the GraphQL schema a specific role is allowed to access, and this is stored in `{Sel,Upd,Ins,Del}PermInfo` objects.
We have passed around these permission objects as function arguments to the schema building blocks since we first started dealing with permissions during the PDV refactor - see hasura/graphql-engine@5168b99e46 in hasura/graphql-engine#4111. This means that, for instance, `tableSelectionSet` has as its type:
```haskell
tableSelectionSet ::
forall b r m n.
MonadBuildSchema b r m n =>
SourceName ->
TableInfo b ->
SelPermInfo b ->
m (Parser 'Output n (AnnotatedFields b))
```
There are three reasons to change this.
1. We often pass a `Maybe (xPermInfo b)` instead of a proper `xPermInfo b`, and it's not clear what the intended semantics of this is. Some potential improvements on the data types involved are discussed in issue hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3125.
2. In most cases we also already pass a `TableInfo b`, and together with the `MonadRole` that is usually also in scope, this means that we could look up the required permissions regardless: so passing the permissions explicitly undermines the "single source of truth" principle. Breaking this principle also makes the code more difficult to read.
3. We are working towards role-based parsers (see hasura/graphql-engine-mono#2711), where the `{InputFields,Field,}Parser` objects are constructed in a role-invariant way, so that we have a single object that can be used for all roles. In particular, this means that the schema building blocks _need_ to be constructed in a role-invariant way. While this PR doesn't accomplish that, it does reduce the amount of role-specific arguments being passed, thus fixing hasura/graphql-engine-mono#3068.
Concretely, this PR simply drops the `xPermInfo b` argument from almost all schema building blocks. Instead these objects are looked up from the `TableInfo b` as-needed. The resulting code is considerably simpler and shorter.
One way to interpret this change is as follows. Before this PR, we figured out permissions at the top-level in `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, passing down the obtained `xPermInfo` objects as required. After this PR, we have a bottom-up approach where the schema building blocks themselves decide whether they want to be included for a particular role.
So this moves some permission logic out of `Hasura.GraphQL.Schema`, which is very complex.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/3608
GitOrigin-RevId: 51a744f34ec7d57bc8077667ae7f9cb9c4f6c962
We'll see if this improves compile times at all, but I think it's worth
doing as at least the most minimal form of module documentation.
This was accomplished by first compiling everything with
-ddump-minimal-imports, and then a bunch of scripting (with help from
ormolu)
**EDIT** it doesn't seem to improve CI compile times but the noise floor is high as it looks like we're not caching library dependencies anymore
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2730
GitOrigin-RevId: 667eb8de1e0f1af70420cbec90402922b8b84cb4
<!-- Thank you for ss in the Title above ^ -->
## Description
<!-- Please fill thier. -->
<!-- Describe the changes from a user's perspective -->
We don't have dependency reporting mechanism for `mssql_run_sql` API i.e when a database object (table, column etc.) is dropped through the API we should raise an exception if any dependencies (relationships, permissions etc.) with the database object exists in the metadata.
This PR addresses the above mentioned problem by
-> Integrating transaction to the API to rollback the SQL query execution if dependencies exists and exception is thrown
-> Accepting `cascade` optional field in the API payload to drop the dependencies, if any
-> Accepting `check_metadata_consistency` optional field to bypass (if value set to `false`) the dependency check
### Related Issues
<!-- Please make surt title -->
<!-- Add the issue number below (e.g. #234) -->
Close#1853
### Solution and Design
<!-- How is this iss -->
<!-- It's better if we elaborate -->
The design/solution follows the `run_sql` API implementation for Postgres backend.
### Steps to test and verify
<!-- If this is a fehis is a bug-fix, how do we verify the fix? -->
- Create author - article tables and track them
- Defined object and array relationships
- Try to drop the article table without cascade or cascade set to `false`
- The server should raise the relationship dependency exists exception
## Changelog
- ✅ `CHANGELOG.md` is updated with user-facing content relevant to this PR.
If no changelog is required, then add the `no-changelog-required` label.
## Affected components
<!-- Remove non-affected components from the list -->
- ✅ Server
- ❎ Console
- ❎ CLI
- ❎ Docs
- ❎ Community Content
- ❎ Build System
- ✅ Tests
- ❎ Other (list it)
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2636
GitOrigin-RevId: 0ab152295394056c4ca6f02923142a1658ad25dc
Prior to this change, the SQL expression that resulted from translating permissions on functions would refer to the table of the function's return type, rather than the set of rows selected from the function being called.
Now the SQL that results from translating permissions correctly refer to the selected rows.
This PR also contains the suggested additions of https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2563#discussion_r726116863, which simplifies the Boolean Expression IR, but in turn makes the Schema Dependency Discovery algorithm work a bit harder.
We are changing the definition of `data OpExpG`, but the format accepted by its JSON parser remains unchanged. While there does exist a generically derived `instance ToJSON OpExpG` this is only used in the (unpublished) `/v1/metadata/dump_internal_state` API.
PR-URL: https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2609
Co-authored-by: Gil Mizrahi <8547573+soupi@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: bb9a0b4addbc239499dd2268909220196984df72
This commit applies ormolu to the whole Haskell code base by running `make format`.
For in-flight branches, simply merging changes from `main` will result in merge conflicts.
To avoid this, update your branch using the following instructions. Replace `<format-commit>`
by the hash of *this* commit.
$ git checkout my-feature-branch
$ git merge <format-commit>^ # and resolve conflicts normally
$ make format
$ git commit -a -m "reformat with ormolu"
$ git merge -s ours post-ormolu
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2404
GitOrigin-RevId: 75049f5c12f430c615eafb4c6b8e83e371e01c8e
This is a follow-up to #1959.
Today, I spent a while in review figuring out that a harmless PR change didn't do anything,
because it was moving from a `runLazy...` to something without the `Lazy`. So let's get
that source of confusion removed.
This should be a bit easier to review commit by commit, since some of the functions had
confusing names. (E.g. there was a misnamed `Migrate.Internal.runTx` before.)
The change should be a no-op.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/2335
GitOrigin-RevId: 0f284c4c0f814482d7827e7732a6d49e7735b302
## Description
This PR fixes an oversight in the implementation of the resolvers of different backends. To implement resolution from environment variables, both MSSQL and BigQuery were directly fetching the process' environment variables, instead of using the careful curated set we thread from main. It was working just fine on OSS, but is failing on Cloud.
This PR fixes this by adding an additional argument to `resolveSourceConfig`, to ensure that backends always use the correct set of variables.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1891
GitOrigin-RevId: 58644cab7d041a8bf4235e2acfe9cf71533a92a1
### Description
This PR is the first of several PRs meant to introduce Generalized Joins. In this first PR, we add non-breaking changes to the Metadata types for DB-to-DB remote joins. Note that we are currently rejecting the new remote join format in order to keep folks from breaking their metadata (in case of a downgrade). These issues will be tackled (and JSON changes reverted) in subsequent PRs.
This PR also changes the way we construct the schema cache, and breaks the way we process sources in two steps: we first resolve each source and construct a cache of their tables' raw info, then in a second step we build the source output. This is so that we have access to the target source's tables when building db-to-db relationships.
### Notes
- this PR contains a few minor cleanups of the schema
- it also fixes a bug in how we do renames in remote schema relationships
- it introduces cross-source schema dependencies
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1727
Co-authored-by: Evie Ciobanu <1017953+eviefp@users.noreply.github.com>
GitOrigin-RevId: f625473077bc5fff5d941b70e9a116192bc1eb22
* fix resetting the catalog version to 43 on migration from 1.0 to 2.0
* ci: remove applying patch in test_oss_server_upgrade job
* make the 43 to 46th migrations idempotent
* Set missing HASURA_GRAPHQL_EVENTS_HTTP_POOL_SIZE=8 in upgrade_test
It's not clear why this wasn't caught in CI.
* ci: disable one component of event backpressure test
Co-authored-by: Vishnu Bharathi P <vishnubharathi04@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Karthikeyan Chinnakonda <karthikeyan@hasura.io>
Co-authored-by: Brandon Simmons <brandon@hasura.io>
GitOrigin-RevId: c74c6425266a99165c6beecc3e4f7c34e6884d4d
Remote relationships are now supported on SQL Server and BigQuery. The major change though is the re-architecture of remote join execution logic. Prior to this PR, each backend is responsible for processing the remote relationships that are part of their AST.
This is not ideal as there is nothing specific about a remote join's execution that ties it to a backend. The only backend specific part is whether or not the specification of the remote relationship is valid (i.e, we'll need to validate whether the scalars are compatible).
The approach now changes to this:
1. Before delegating the AST to the backend, we traverse the AST, collect all the remote joins while modifying the AST to add necessary join fields where needed.
1. Once the remote joins are collected from the AST, the database call is made to fetch the response. The necessary data for the remote join(s) is collected from the database's response and one or more remote schema calls are constructed as necessary.
1. The remote schema calls are then executed and the data from the database and from the remote schemas is joined to produce the final response.
### Known issues
1. Ideally the traversal of the IR to collect remote joins should return an AST which does not include remote join fields. This operation can be type safe but isn't taken up as part of the PR.
1. There is a lot of code duplication between `Transport/HTTP.hs` and `Transport/Websocket.hs` which needs to be fixed ASAP. This too hasn't been taken up by this PR.
1. The type which represents the execution plan is only modified to handle our current remote joins and as such it will have to be changed to accommodate general remote joins.
1. Use of lenses would have reduced the boilerplate code to collect remote joins from the base AST.
1. The current remote join logic assumes that the join columns of a remote relationship appear with their names in the database response. This however is incorrect as they could be aliased. This can be taken up by anyone, I've left a comment in the code.
### Notes to the reviewers
I think it is best reviewed commit by commit.
1. The first one is very straight forward.
1. The second one refactors the remote join execution logic but other than moving things around, it doesn't change the user facing functionality. This moves Postgres specific parts to `Backends/Postgres` module from `Execute`. Some IR related code to `Hasura.RQL.IR` module. Simplifies various type class function signatures as a backend doesn't have to handle remote joins anymore
1. The third one fixes partial case matches that for some weird reason weren't shown as warnings before this refactor
1. The fourth one generalizes the validation logic of remote relationships and implements `scalarTypeGraphQLName` function on SQL Server and BigQuery which is used by the validation logic. This enables remote relationships on BigQuery and SQL Server.
https://github.com/hasura/graphql-engine-mono/pull/1497
GitOrigin-RevId: 77dd8eed326602b16e9a8496f52f46d22b795598
This reverts the remote schema type customisation and namespacing feature temporarily as we test for certain conditions.
GitOrigin-RevId: f8ee97233da4597f703970c3998664c03582d8e7
